A team of comedic improvisers (mostly "Whose Line" alums) headed by Drew Carey perform on a green screen set, and their antics are now fleshed out with amusing animation.A team of comedic improvisers (mostly "Whose Line" alums) headed by Drew Carey perform on a green screen set, and their antics are now fleshed out with amusing animation.A team of comedic improvisers (mostly "Whose Line" alums) headed by Drew Carey perform on a green screen set, and their antics are now fleshed out with amusing animation.
Browse episodes
Photos
Featured reviews
This show isn't funny at all. They completely ruined the whole improve theme. The cartoons aren't that great and they dim down the funniness from the show. It funnier when there's nothing there. Whos idea was it to cancel Whose Line is it Anyway for this? Another big glitch, how can you have an improv show without Ryan Stiles and Wayne Brady? What the heck is going on here? Poor Colin doesn't have his comedy partner anymore. This show just isn't good at all. Some of these people I never even heard of. They're not Whose Line is it Anyway patrons. There just some plain bland comedian that came out of nowhere. Sadly I bet this show is going to be a success.
The use of the technology on the Green Screen Show is very clever but looks like a lot of hard work. As others have written though, the concept of drawing in details later definitely clashes with the whole premise of improv. This is two halves that don't come together.
Firstly, the improv: the performers are doing their thing ad-hoc, and they're funny. They have a live audience that laughs at their jokes.
Secondly, you have brilliant animation. This would be great in its own right, but it has no live audience (which is fine for animation, ordinarily, but here it doesn't work).
The reason this combination feels so odd is that you can't shake the knowledge that the studio audience are only seeing the improv, and only laughing at the improv, whereas we (the home audience) get to see the added detail and jokes - which have no audience laughing at them. The result is the same uncomfortable feeling you get when you realise that a sitcom has a laughter track (canned laughter).
Great effort, but the format (Whose Line is it Anyway) wasn't broke, so why try to fix it?
Firstly, the improv: the performers are doing their thing ad-hoc, and they're funny. They have a live audience that laughs at their jokes.
Secondly, you have brilliant animation. This would be great in its own right, but it has no live audience (which is fine for animation, ordinarily, but here it doesn't work).
The reason this combination feels so odd is that you can't shake the knowledge that the studio audience are only seeing the improv, and only laughing at the improv, whereas we (the home audience) get to see the added detail and jokes - which have no audience laughing at them. The result is the same uncomfortable feeling you get when you realise that a sitcom has a laughter track (canned laughter).
Great effort, but the format (Whose Line is it Anyway) wasn't broke, so why try to fix it?
Being a huge fan of Whose Line is it Anyway (both the British and American versions), I kept counting down the days until Drew Carey's Green Screen show had its debut. When it finally was showed, I was a little disappointed with the comedy - there were many boring parts. However, the technical aspects were amazing! I absolutely loved the animation. It really looked good, especially the 3D graphics in "Zeppelin".
Something I didn't like was the way they laid out the commercial time. There would be one game, then a commercial, then a game, then a commercial and so on. The total time of the pilot episode turned out to be 20 minutes (as compared to other 30 minute shows which run around 23 minutes).
I was hoping that the second episode would show some other games that worked, but it only showed the same games, some working and some not working.
The third episode will air next Thursday, and I am going to try my best to enjoy it fully. I think that after the first season, if the show gets picked up again, they are going to have to work out the kinks. Hey - even "Whose Line" had it's bad points, and I am hoping that the Green Screen Show will fix its problems and get better.
As of now, the show is okay, but it has the potential to be so much better.
-Ken
Something I didn't like was the way they laid out the commercial time. There would be one game, then a commercial, then a game, then a commercial and so on. The total time of the pilot episode turned out to be 20 minutes (as compared to other 30 minute shows which run around 23 minutes).
I was hoping that the second episode would show some other games that worked, but it only showed the same games, some working and some not working.
The third episode will air next Thursday, and I am going to try my best to enjoy it fully. I think that after the first season, if the show gets picked up again, they are going to have to work out the kinks. Hey - even "Whose Line" had it's bad points, and I am hoping that the Green Screen Show will fix its problems and get better.
As of now, the show is okay, but it has the potential to be so much better.
-Ken
I really liked the Green Screen Show. It was kind of shaky at first but as the shows went on and the performers (and animators) got in the groove it became really enjoyable. The lack of Ryan Styles would have been a big black eye were it not for newcomer Jeff B. Davis. That guy is hilarious. No offense to her, but Kathy Kinney is the only performer I don't like. She seems to have been thrown in there as a favor from Drew to get some work. She doesn't seem to have any real improv skills. The show does take away the raw imagination of the Whose Line is it Anyway's style but the overt goofiness of the props drawn in make up for it. With a little more polish this could become a great show....if it ever makes it back to TV.
Whose Line Is It Anyway was excellent, but here the special effects just distract the viewer from what made it so good. This seems like nothing but a showcase for the technical possibilities. The animations and sounds don't add anything useful to the scenes at all. It makes you feel like you're reading a book with all the events already imagined in your head as acted out by cartoon characters.
Most of the actors are still doing a good job. Colin Mochrie stands out every now and then even without Ryan Stiles. Unfortunately most of the time even his talent is wasted when wrapped in cartoons. Drew Carey's best talent is not in improvising, but here he's taken a bigger role in the games as well.
It's nowhere near as funny as Whose Line Is It Anyway.
Most of the actors are still doing a good job. Colin Mochrie stands out every now and then even without Ryan Stiles. Unfortunately most of the time even his talent is wasted when wrapped in cartoons. Drew Carey's best talent is not in improvising, but here he's taken a bigger role in the games as well.
It's nowhere near as funny as Whose Line Is It Anyway.
Did you know
- TriviaA taping with Ryan Stiles was recorded but, as of November 2005, it remains unaired.
- Quotes
Jeff Bryan Davis: [playing one-syllable words "At the Racetrack"] Why would you put a sick horse in the race?
Colin Mochrie: I need... dough. If he was not in the race I would get no dough!
- ConnectionsSpin-off from Whose Line Is It Anyway? (1998)
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Also known as
- Drew Carey's Green Screen Show
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 30m
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content