A secret bioweapons lab invaded by mercenaries becomes a house of horrors when they encounter MR. HELL, an ancient serial killer who takes souls by removing his victims eyes.A secret bioweapons lab invaded by mercenaries becomes a house of horrors when they encounter MR. HELL, an ancient serial killer who takes souls by removing his victims eyes.A secret bioweapons lab invaded by mercenaries becomes a house of horrors when they encounter MR. HELL, an ancient serial killer who takes souls by removing his victims eyes.
David Carren
- V.C. (Toxic Waste Worker)
- (as David B. Carren)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Mr. Hell is a roller coaster ride to hell. This film is a throw back to the days of old, and sometimes feels as if you are watching a 1970's horror flick. Set in a toxic chemical plant the movie delivers some great special effects and sets. Watching this film you feel yourself lost in the endless corridors of an old chemical plants tunnel system. One would be hard pressed to find sets this good even in Hollywood. This is a very dark film with some of the best low budget special effects this reporter has seen in sometime. Great FX Company ( ProFX Inc.) Very good B Movie. Gary Watson pulled off a very good piece of work with the filming of this low budget soon to be horror cult film. Great shots Gary! Hope to see more from this team in the future. Great FX company.
Movie Pro Sun Review
Movie Pro Sun Review
Did any of you, "who watched the movie", actually see any of the stunts performed?? If so, what did you think? I watched the movie, and I'm no motion picture stuntman, but I thought the action was awesome! If anyone out there has actually scene the movie, and didn't help make the movie, please give an honest reply about the stunts. I have not scene a B-movie with action such as stair-falls, fire-burns, and fight scenes to the caliber of Hollywood in ANY B-rated movie EVER! Please respond with your personal opinion. Whether you like the movie or not, let's hear what you think about the stunts in this film. From a novice's point of view, tell me, (the B-Rated movie fan), what people think.
WOW!!! Is this movie bad and I mean BAD!!! There's like no special effect violence or gore in this movie at all!! And to say this is a slasher movie that's not a good thing.
All these good reviews are clearly fake put up by the director and his friends no doubt!! No redeeming qualities in this movie whatsoever!!
With the exception of Tracy Scoggins (Who recently removed her name from the credits I might add, What's that tell you) all the women in this movie are ugly and the acting is as bad as I've EVER seen in a "B" movie (And I try to see them all) Do something better with your money like buying a 12 pack and looking out your window because I guarantee you'll get more entertainment doing that that watching one minute of this movie.
I really don't know what is worse the fact that I rented this movie or the fact that I actually watched the whole thing...I think I would've paid the rental fee to have not watched this movie as now I'm out both my money and my time. Two simple words STAY AWAY!!!!!
All these good reviews are clearly fake put up by the director and his friends no doubt!! No redeeming qualities in this movie whatsoever!!
With the exception of Tracy Scoggins (Who recently removed her name from the credits I might add, What's that tell you) all the women in this movie are ugly and the acting is as bad as I've EVER seen in a "B" movie (And I try to see them all) Do something better with your money like buying a 12 pack and looking out your window because I guarantee you'll get more entertainment doing that that watching one minute of this movie.
I really don't know what is worse the fact that I rented this movie or the fact that I actually watched the whole thing...I think I would've paid the rental fee to have not watched this movie as now I'm out both my money and my time. Two simple words STAY AWAY!!!!!
If you want to have a good laugh, this is the movie you need!! It has the feeling of an old school horror movie. Don't think you will see a masterpiece because it's not, what Mr.Hell is though is a good entertaining movie. The special effects are so bad that it makes the movie even more enjoyable. The talent effort is there, nothing really good but nothing really bad either. The storyline is simple, a doctor get killed 15 years ago by an ancient soul-taker, Mr.Hell... and now he has returned. MR.Hell is quite sadistic but it's nothing really gory. Like I said, it worth the price at the video store, because I laugh more in this movie than any other comedy with Ashton Kutcher, Seann William Scott, David Spade who try to be funny but aren't, and retarded actors like that!
Acting in this movie is amateur (makes one wonder what motivated the choice of genre), representing typical, nonetheless exasperating, mix of inadequate feelings (consequently, behavior) and involuntary pauses between lines being filled with either blank or bewildered facial expressions.
Arguably, the plot isn't much worse than that of the "exclusive horror" movie majority, meaning it's plain, predictable and thus, boring (when not silly).
Dialogues complete "Mr. Hell" as a cinematographic disaster, being fragmentary, extremely uninformative and unnatural. Moreover, sadly, the writers chose to uphold the flawed tradition of covering up the lack of scariness with would-be humor, would-be irony and would-be sarcasm, manifested in shabby, overly repetitive "cliché - change of context - touché" form.
The only thing that counts positive is solid B-class photography.
Arguably, the plot isn't much worse than that of the "exclusive horror" movie majority, meaning it's plain, predictable and thus, boring (when not silly).
Dialogues complete "Mr. Hell" as a cinematographic disaster, being fragmentary, extremely uninformative and unnatural. Moreover, sadly, the writers chose to uphold the flawed tradition of covering up the lack of scariness with would-be humor, would-be irony and would-be sarcasm, manifested in shabby, overly repetitive "cliché - change of context - touché" form.
The only thing that counts positive is solid B-class photography.
Did you know
- ConnectionsReferences Les aventures de Robin des Bois (1938)
Details
- Runtime
- 1h 42m(102 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content