A secret bioweapons lab invaded by mercenaries becomes a house of horrors when they encounter MR. HELL, an ancient serial killer who takes souls by removing his victims eyes.A secret bioweapons lab invaded by mercenaries becomes a house of horrors when they encounter MR. HELL, an ancient serial killer who takes souls by removing his victims eyes.A secret bioweapons lab invaded by mercenaries becomes a house of horrors when they encounter MR. HELL, an ancient serial killer who takes souls by removing his victims eyes.
David Carren
- V.C. (Toxic Waste Worker)
- (as David B. Carren)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
I Have to say i have seen some pretty bad movies in my time and i actually quite like bad horror movies. I'm a huge fan of B Movies and independent film unfortunately you occasionally get your fingers burned like i did with Mr Hell.
One thing i'm happy about is i never paid to see this movie if i had i would have demanded my money back directly from the film makers. there's just no excuse for a movie this bad.
It looks terrible, the acting is awful, the diolouge is some of the worst i have ever seen in a low budget film and thats saying something.
worst of all it wasn't scary at all the FX where terrible and its attempts at humour where utterly horrible.
I wish i could give this movie less than a rating of 1 but unfortunately i cant however if i can say anything positive the gore is plentifull avoid this movie, regardless of your taste in film i guarantee you wont like this its impossible to find anything at all good to say about it.
it gets a 0.5 rating in my book and the 0.5 is there purely for the gore.
Awful, Awful, Awful...
One thing i'm happy about is i never paid to see this movie if i had i would have demanded my money back directly from the film makers. there's just no excuse for a movie this bad.
It looks terrible, the acting is awful, the diolouge is some of the worst i have ever seen in a low budget film and thats saying something.
worst of all it wasn't scary at all the FX where terrible and its attempts at humour where utterly horrible.
I wish i could give this movie less than a rating of 1 but unfortunately i cant however if i can say anything positive the gore is plentifull avoid this movie, regardless of your taste in film i guarantee you wont like this its impossible to find anything at all good to say about it.
it gets a 0.5 rating in my book and the 0.5 is there purely for the gore.
Awful, Awful, Awful...
The worst acting I've seen. No talent. Even worse story line. Amy Morris is such a pretty woman, maybe she could be cast in a better movie. The writers made the two workers down below such idiots. This movie has no.. repeat.. no commom sense. The special effects should be re-named the stupid effects. Nothing made any sense. I would hate to know I went and spent money to see this movie....Oh but wait, I did, I rented it. Well I wanted to watch a horror movie and I guess I did. It was a horror to watch it. The bad guys come in with a load of weapons to take over a run down toxic plant with one teenage security guard at the gate with headphones and one more lady security guard armed with a coffee cup and bad acting.
Acting in this movie is amateur (makes one wonder what motivated the choice of genre), representing typical, nonetheless exasperating, mix of inadequate feelings (consequently, behavior) and involuntary pauses between lines being filled with either blank or bewildered facial expressions.
Arguably, the plot isn't much worse than that of the "exclusive horror" movie majority, meaning it's plain, predictable and thus, boring (when not silly).
Dialogues complete "Mr. Hell" as a cinematographic disaster, being fragmentary, extremely uninformative and unnatural. Moreover, sadly, the writers chose to uphold the flawed tradition of covering up the lack of scariness with would-be humor, would-be irony and would-be sarcasm, manifested in shabby, overly repetitive "cliché - change of context - touché" form.
The only thing that counts positive is solid B-class photography.
Arguably, the plot isn't much worse than that of the "exclusive horror" movie majority, meaning it's plain, predictable and thus, boring (when not silly).
Dialogues complete "Mr. Hell" as a cinematographic disaster, being fragmentary, extremely uninformative and unnatural. Moreover, sadly, the writers chose to uphold the flawed tradition of covering up the lack of scariness with would-be humor, would-be irony and would-be sarcasm, manifested in shabby, overly repetitive "cliché - change of context - touché" form.
The only thing that counts positive is solid B-class photography.
Mr. Hell is a roller coaster ride to hell. This film is a throw back to the days of old, and sometimes feels as if you are watching a 1970's horror flick. Set in a toxic chemical plant the movie delivers some great special effects and sets. Watching this film you feel yourself lost in the endless corridors of an old chemical plants tunnel system. One would be hard pressed to find sets this good even in Hollywood. This is a very dark film with some of the best low budget special effects this reporter has seen in sometime. Great FX Company ( ProFX Inc.) Very good B Movie. Gary Watson pulled off a very good piece of work with the filming of this low budget soon to be horror cult film. Great shots Gary! Hope to see more from this team in the future. Great FX company.
Movie Pro Sun Review
Movie Pro Sun Review
I resisted about 20minutes in front of the screen, but it wasn't the flick nor the murders...it was the horror acting of those people cause i can't refer to them as actors.
I've seen school plays better directed with better acting and why not with even more credibility from the actors than this one, I mean pleeease not even the swearing is believable, so yes i give it a 1 for awful.
If he is Mr. Hell than his name probably comes from the acting cause he killed every single line of script and every single frame of film the director wasted on one of the worst movies ever.
If you wanna see a better movie with a killer that plucks the eyes of from his victims you should go to see "See no evil" cause even though the "bad childhood" cliché was overdone, you don't get up from your chair screaming in horror cause of the awful non-existing acting
I've seen school plays better directed with better acting and why not with even more credibility from the actors than this one, I mean pleeease not even the swearing is believable, so yes i give it a 1 for awful.
If he is Mr. Hell than his name probably comes from the acting cause he killed every single line of script and every single frame of film the director wasted on one of the worst movies ever.
If you wanna see a better movie with a killer that plucks the eyes of from his victims you should go to see "See no evil" cause even though the "bad childhood" cliché was overdone, you don't get up from your chair screaming in horror cause of the awful non-existing acting
Did you know
- ConnectionsReferences Les aventures de Robin des Bois (1938)
Details
- Runtime
- 1h 42m(102 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content