No Retreat from Destiny: The Battle That Rescued Washington

The acting may a bit cheesy at times, and the make up regarding facial hair definitely looked fake. But, the authenticity of the weapons and the devastating effects they had made up for it. The battle scenes were actually cringe-worthy as a result. I can't even imagine the cajones it must've taken to stand in the open with bullets whizzing by and your comrades on either side of you being mortality wounded.

My wife's Great Great Grandfather fought in this campaign under Jubal Early so we are very familiar with the story and the events that occurred. Most of this depiction is well done from an historical perspective even if most of the actors are obviously amateurs and some of the costuming was not the best. But, it was a low budget effort and most of the film is taken up by reenact-ors who did an excellent job of creating a realistic battlefield experience that would have been common for the War of Northern Aggression. Somehow it was kind of fitting that the absolute worst actor in the movie was the guy playing Abraham Lincoln, himself a terrible person and vehement war criminal. There was another piece of the story that didn't make it into the film as John McCausland was sent by Early to go on to Chambersburg, PA to exact compensation from the town for the burning of VMI by the Yankees earlier that year. Unfortunately, the townspeople refused to pay the $100k ransom so the Confederates burned the town except for the Jewish Synagogue and the Masonic Lodge. We lived there then for over 30 years and they now have a commemoration for the Burning of Chambersburg, the only town North of the Mason Dixon Line to be burned by Confederate forces. Whereas, the Yankees burned dozens of towns, homes, farms, businesses, churches, and other structures throughout the South.

This really is a very good Civil War film. The depiction of command communication and frustration covers that end. The well-researched and -enacted battle scenes are convincing, as are the scenes of the dead and of the medical personnel trying to save/treat the wounded. So are the scenes of a soldier's life and the constant quest for food.

I thought the actors who portrayed Lincoln and Davis were very good. Surely, that Confederate sniper knew it was Lincoln by his tall hat and wounded the Union medical officer instead as a warning? See "The Fort Stevens Incident" posted on Internet by the Jack Miller Center.

Actor Todd Hunter who played Jubal Early certainly looked and acted his part!

General Lew Wallace's delaying action at Monocacy Junction on 9 July 1864 gave the Union the necessary 24 hours to save Washington, but did Early provide another 24 hours, letting his men rest/sleep overnight instead of marching on to the city that night with troops who weren't so exhausted?

Would Custer ... or Patton ... have paused to rest and regroup like that?

The film noted that decision.

By this time of the war, the Union especially had repeating rifles which are missing from the film.

All the key historical commanders and units and locations are represented, and frequent references to a map are most helpful.

I have just put up on the Internet a free/educational little print-and-play game about the battle and brief siege of Washington, Postcard Monocacy Junction, 9-11 July 1864.

This film could be very good for high school classes.

My great-grandfather, Alfred N. Sova (1847-1935) was a private in the 9th New York Heavy Artillery, assigned to Rickett's Division of the Sixth Corps. He is portrayed by Jeremy Wade in the bridge burning scene. While not entirely accurate, (the wheat sheaves were actually placed in the roof area of the bridge prior to Alfred "shinning" up a beam to start the fire), these dramatic scenes certainly depict the courage and confusion in the fog of war.

Although Alfred also fought at Cold Harbor, Cedar Creek, the Peterburg Breakthrough and Saylor's Creek, his actions at the Battle of Monocacy and personal role in the strategic burning of the covered bridge were the highlight of his military service and the experience that he recounted most often to his family and friends during his long life.

~Fred Rohrer

I'm writing this as someone not connected to this project in any way and wouldn't have an intimate knowledge as to budgets nor activities represented in this video. Those are not things regular viewes would know.

That being said, I will say of the production values that they seemed pretty good for the most part. The video starts off with a woman obviously from the south speaking very poetically. That same voice and type of speaking appears a few more times but that's it. This video was included in the "Lincoln: Trial by Fire" DVD collection.

To be painfully honest, the video came off more of a bunch of Civil War re-enactors wanting to document what they do rather than be about some battle that saves the citry of our nations capital. (At least that's what the Summary says it's about.) There is no voice-over explaining to us what what was happening nor why troops were being moved into certain positions nor what happened that would spur them to take the action either side was taken. At certain parts there is a subtitle at the bottom with the name of the location and, at time, the name of the person in the frame which is fine but I kept asking myself "Why?". Granted, there is some dialogue like, for instance, you see a bunch of Confederate soldiers walking along a rode next to a fence where some women were hanging about only to have one of the soldiers run over to one of them who begins to almost plead him to just forget everything and come on home while he's saying he can't. Then, I think it involved the same two people, while he's back with those walking he runs back and gives her some kind of red fabric but not sure because he didn't have it on him just a few seconds earlier.

There were spots where the voice of the person talking was muffled but instead of hearing words, you heard whatever it was around the mic being rustled as if it was inside a saddlebag...you can see someone's mouth moving...just couldn't hear them. For the most part, you have men moving from place to place firing their rifles or a cannon or two but nothing to explain what was going on.

In places where a location was indicated in a subtitle on the bottom of the screen, never was a map ever shown showing us the bigger picture...only local maps thay may (or may not) have existed at the time. There may have been a year indicated in those subtitles but to be honest, I don't remember seeing them so I don't know how close to the end of the war these activities occurred (other than one of the re-enactiors stating that this was the 3rd attempt on Washington D.C. by the Confederacy).

My advice to future film-makers: if you want to tell us a story than do that...tell us the story. Don't just show us a bunch of people running around shooting guns at each other in different color uniforms. In a sense I was feeling much like the Confederate soldiers must have felt...confused and questioning what was the point. In all, this video had the promise of being different since it seemed to be telling it from the point of the Confederacy, it's just a shame it didn't live up that promise...nor any other.