State Property 2

This movie moves way to fast to keep up with what's going on. It doesn't help either that sometimes it's impossible to understand what the characters are saying. It almost feels like there should be subtitles down the bottom. Basically, as far as I can tell anyway, the story moves from one character to another and shows their involvement in the overall plot. Then at the end it tries to explain itself, but by then the audience is already so lost as to what's going on that it's pretty pointless anyway. It also seemed as if the writers really believed that massive shootouts in the middle of the city still happened every 5 minutes and that no one took any notice as if it was an everyday occurrence. It really seemed as if they believed those scenes to actually be possible in todays world.

Not one that's going to be remembered as great by any stretch of the imagination. There isn't a type of person in existence who would enjoy this film, and that probably includes you so stay away.

I recently watched State Property 2 (2005) on Tubi. The storyline continues from the previous film, with "Beans" in jail for drug trafficking. Upon discovering that his crew is losing ground in Philadelphia's drug trade to gangs from New York and Miami, "Beans" forms a new alliance with Freeway to regain control of the streets upon his release, inevitably leading to a war.

Directed by and starring Damon Dash (Paper Soldiers), and featuring Beanie Sigel (Boiler Room), N. O. R. E. (Paid in Full), Roselyn Sánchez (Rush Hour 2), Mariah Carey (Precious), and Freeway (Hustle).

This is one of those movies that feels like it's put together by someone who doesn't create movies...because it is. Despite a solid narration and soundtrack, the movie suffers from disjointed direction. While the jail scenes feel authentic and engaging, the film loses its footing once Damon Dash's character enters the picture. His portrayal comes across as forced and undermines the film's credibility. Mariah Carey's inclusion also feels out of place. Overall, the movie becomes increasingly difficult to watch as it progresses.

In conclusion, State Property 2 has a few redeeming scenes but ultimately fails to deliver as a cohesive film. I would rate it a 4/10 and suggest skipping it.

When I first saw the movie, I did get a little confused with all the characters and voice-overs. But, thats what style is all about. Doing things different,new, your own way. These may be rappers,but they are very intelligent and wealthy.I can appreciate the busy story telling.What would the movie world be like without pioneers.Look at Citizen Kane, a movie that wasn't given its credit until twenty years later because of new techniques and ideas. Now its a classic movie studied by many.I wonder why wealthy hip-hip moguls are bashed when creative,but what about the low budget likes of Napolean Dynamite. The days of the 3-part traditional movie format is over.State property is making a move in the right direction,with multiple narration and flashbacks.

No pun intended - this is a direct sequel to the previous movie. So it does make sense to watch both movies. On the other hand, if you only want to watch one of the two ... well make it this one. It is obvious that it has more money (budget wise) and even the actors do not seem to fall off as much as they did in the first movie.

That being said, some might (rightfully) argue, that the people involved are not really actors. And that is true, because most of them are musicians (rappers). So while they are good doing one thing ... that doesn't mean they can do the other thing too. Still the schemes and the twists do work ... and even the voice over is not as annoying as it was in the first one ... or maybe I just got used to it all.

Whatever the case, you have to suspend your disbelief to actually enjoy watching this ... so be aware of this. Also, I was thinking watching this, that it did not have as much nudity as the first one ... and just as I was thinking it, a scene came up that almost covered up all the nudity the first one had .. no pun intended. Of course as with the first one, there is no real reason for that to exist in the movie/story ... but if that is the only thing that offends you ... well the movie did something right I reckon ...

In a movie, which starts off with a pitiful retcon, plot barely registers as an meaningful ingredient. After the graphic death of Beans (Beanie Sigel) during his own trial, which punctuated the badness of the first part, it turns out that the gangsta was just playing and you know... that never really took place. Hence we follow Beans inadvertent incarceration and his laughable attempts at leading his crime empire from prison. Two other criminal mastermind-wanabees also feature - Dame (Damon Dash) and El Pollo Loco (Noreaga). Full with constant voice-over, where we find out the intricate thought processes, which take up most of our antiheroes comprehensive and intellectual capabilities, leaving them with little or nothing left to actually think through their actions.

During the movie we are introduced to some prison code, when Beans discusses business with his crew. 'Surprise parties' are nothing more than gang-organised armed robberies and honestly by the end of the movie the gut feeling is that you have just partaken been the victim of such a party - robbed of time and energy. It must be however said, that despite everything Damon Dash's movie is significantly better directed, than the first part and the story is much more cohesive, even though plot devices are poorly used. Nonetheless he even attempts a plot twist, which however signalised it may have been, actually provided a backdrop for some passable build-up.

Cinematography and to a very limited extent acting (overly self-serving and contrived) is much improved, which shows some professionalisation of the filmmaking process was achieved.

Within a few days of watching the movie is already blurry, so I'm rather certain that the only signature proof of my ever viewing "State Property 2" will be this review.