Model Lust

They could have at the very least taught the photographer how to hold the camera while he was clicking away on useless poses ... shooting nudes is tougher than it looks and real glamour photographers rarely use an electronic flash ... where were the lighting techs ? well this isn't the only male fantasy ever filmed

Well this one isn't as good as it seems although it features the super sexy April Flowers and the always effective Holly Hollywood.

The direct to video feeling to this is cheap and the production values didn't fit for the movie's tone. What do I mean? The sex amount is good but it's not as explicit or steamy as expected.

Heck, this movies need plenty of sex but also good acting if you can call it that way. I mean, there was no chemistry between the cast and some scenes were really boring. I'm not saying I want almost hardcore but more detailed sex scenes wouldn't be a bad thing.

I can't recommend this poor soft core effort. Avoid it if you can.

See this movie for the Boobs. The naked ones, or the ones who wrote, directed or acted in it. It's Softcore Porn, that doesn't waste a lot of time on plot between scenes where 5 or 6 different pretty girls seem eager to get naked and get it on with some guy or in front of a camera. The Porn is as light as the Plot. The Girls and the Plot are cute. The Characters and their Relationships are NOT Deep. People who would want to see the movie could probably stop reading after my first sentence. But a comment about the MOVIE and it's genre should go further.

This is mostly male fantasy, a notch or two above typical Porn work. Many girls do go to Hollywood to "Find Themselves" or "Get Discoverred" as a Model or Actress. In the Male or the Female fantasies, they never have financial difficulties, never have to work hard, never have to learn anything, and find instant success as fast as the instant gratification of zipless sex.

This is "Nice Porn" or Soft for what you don't see. No Genitals or Penetration, No Drugs or Drunks, No Coercion, some mild Violence but it's not in the Sex. Nobody seems to think about STD's or contraception or morals. It is Male Porn because people have sex based on physical attraction and lust, not respect or relationships.

The Girls are passably pretty. The actresses (or Characters?) are people I could like -- fun, adventurous, amorous. I might even rent a few other movies just to see them again. For Entertainment, not everything we want to see has deep meaning or complicated plots. Some days, it's just for the boobs.

Adventurous and sexy college student Arielle (played by Juliana Kincaid), heads to Los Angeles after first treating her beau to an afternoon delight. He wants her to stay, but she wants to "find herself" in LA.

Arielle arrives at the Hollywood home and lust-nest of beautiful cousin Tracy Henderson (Diana Espen, aka April Flowers), and Tracy introduces her to the local modeling scene, temperamental photographer Scardino (John Castine), and handsome, cocky model Lance (Glen Meadows). Lance arouses Arielle's attention, but international intrigue and espionage worries arise to threaten these cozy affairs, and pretty Arielle must balance her lust-life with national security concerns.

The subplots serve to offer ample opportunity for plenty of skin, including beauties in full frontal view, and numerous sexual encounters, including the usual full range of straight and lesbian activity. These encounters are fairly erotic, with uncommonly attractive men and women, except in the case of a couple of lesbian second-level models, who appear a bit cheap and fleshy.

Most of the acting is credible, but a few of the bit-part players seem flighty. The plot is lightweight, but the execution was generally successful, except for a couple of rough transitions. The movie is lightweight, too, but the objective is soft-porn titillation, and the sex scenes fulfill the goal.

Plot: C+. Shallow

Acting: B. Adequate

Women: B+. Quite pleasing to view, though less stunning than some

Men: B. Reasonably handsome

Eroticism: A- Plentiful and varied

Overall: B+ Pretty good soft-porn

Ariella (Juliana Kinkade) daydreams about being a model as well as a secret agent, after her sister finds her a job as a model photographer's lackey. It's best to concentrate on the girls, as the storyline is silly and i HATE ending where it was all a dream anyway. But all the girls were unusually beautiful and the film was much more light-hearted than any other soft-core film I've seen of late. So that raises the grade up a tad.

The Goods: 6 sex scenes (m/f, female threesome,f/f ) nude modeling

Babe of the movie: Mary Carey. Juiliana is cute and all, but I don't like plastic boobs so the former governor Candide gets my vote

My Softcore Grade: B-