A daily general knowledge quiz show where challengers face the formidable Eggheads, former champions of other quiz shows, competing for a cash prize.A daily general knowledge quiz show where challengers face the formidable Eggheads, former champions of other quiz shows, competing for a cash prize.A daily general knowledge quiz show where challengers face the formidable Eggheads, former champions of other quiz shows, competing for a cash prize.
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
You get home from a long day at work and want to watch something that doesn't require too many brain cells or attention. What do you turn to?
Eggheads is your average, slow-paced multiple choice pub-style quiz show. Right from the get-go you get a formula: The presenter uses the same words and phrases each episode, and each time there is a different group of contestants who are connected in some way - graduates from the same college, nuns from the same convent, worm charmers from the same worm charming club. You get the point. The questions are all very similar, but are all very difficult, with the exception of the first question in each round. Don't expect to know most of the answers. The topics range from Food and Drink to History to Film and Television.
The points system is also formulaic. Four of the five challengers get to face head-to-head their choice of one of five Eggheads, a team of expert quiz winners who rotate from a larger selection of Eggheads, which ranges from about six to eight depending on the season. Each head-to-head winner gets to compete in the final round, and each loser has to sit outside. By the end of the show, it's usually three against two, or one against four, usually with an advantage for The Eggheads, because, well, they're better than the contestants. If the constants win their set of three questions (followed by a Sudden Death round if there's a tie), they win the prize money, which increases by one thousand pounds for every episode the contestants lose. The prize money often gets to around, but rarely over, 20-ish thousand pounds.
The Eggheads are all amiable, with the exception of the know-it-all CJ, who is always pulling faces when the head-to-head challengers get their answers wrong. Still, they're a joy to watch and their personalities are all memorable. The first host, Dermot, was a bit dry. The co-host in the later series, Jeremy, is more fun, but still sticks heavily to the formula.
The show is a good time-waster, but it lacks the suspense of its competitors like Who Wants to be a Millionaire, not only because the prize money is less, but because it's quite dull by nature. Nevertheless, I watch it every weekday simply because it's something familiar, routine, and regular.
6/10
"So tune in next time to see if a new team of challengers have what it takes to beat The Eggheads! Twelve thousand pounds says they don't. Until then, goodbye."
Eggheads is your average, slow-paced multiple choice pub-style quiz show. Right from the get-go you get a formula: The presenter uses the same words and phrases each episode, and each time there is a different group of contestants who are connected in some way - graduates from the same college, nuns from the same convent, worm charmers from the same worm charming club. You get the point. The questions are all very similar, but are all very difficult, with the exception of the first question in each round. Don't expect to know most of the answers. The topics range from Food and Drink to History to Film and Television.
The points system is also formulaic. Four of the five challengers get to face head-to-head their choice of one of five Eggheads, a team of expert quiz winners who rotate from a larger selection of Eggheads, which ranges from about six to eight depending on the season. Each head-to-head winner gets to compete in the final round, and each loser has to sit outside. By the end of the show, it's usually three against two, or one against four, usually with an advantage for The Eggheads, because, well, they're better than the contestants. If the constants win their set of three questions (followed by a Sudden Death round if there's a tie), they win the prize money, which increases by one thousand pounds for every episode the contestants lose. The prize money often gets to around, but rarely over, 20-ish thousand pounds.
The Eggheads are all amiable, with the exception of the know-it-all CJ, who is always pulling faces when the head-to-head challengers get their answers wrong. Still, they're a joy to watch and their personalities are all memorable. The first host, Dermot, was a bit dry. The co-host in the later series, Jeremy, is more fun, but still sticks heavily to the formula.
The show is a good time-waster, but it lacks the suspense of its competitors like Who Wants to be a Millionaire, not only because the prize money is less, but because it's quite dull by nature. Nevertheless, I watch it every weekday simply because it's something familiar, routine, and regular.
6/10
"So tune in next time to see if a new team of challengers have what it takes to beat The Eggheads! Twelve thousand pounds says they don't. Until then, goodbye."
As a big fan of general knowledge quizzes, I tune in to Eggheads even though I am not totally swayed by it. Even so, it is probably better than most BBC quiz shows, and that includes the irritating and past its sell-by-date Weakest Link.
Let's be positive to begin with and state the good points:
1. It has two of the best quizzers in the country, Kevin Ashman and Daphne Fowler.
2. It shows how lucky Judith Keppel got with her Millionaire win. She is well above average for her general knowledge, but if she had to go through the 15 questions on WWTBAM again, I'd place money on her not winning - even if she had another ten attempts. But fair dos and congratulations to her.
3. You can join in with the fun and answer questions before the rest of your family. Well, usually.
4. Occasionally the opponents really do have the Eggheads on the ropes, and there is a smidgen of tension as we await the outcome.
Now, since I'm struggling to think of the good points, here are the bad points.
1. Most of the questions are pretty easy, just to give the opponents a chance, and then hope one of the Eggheads will slip up. Also, the caliber of people on the public side is pretty poor sometimes.
2. The people going on to the show should really sort out their tactics better. Play Kevin on entertainment, Daphne on sport, although these pair are pretty good on everything anyway.
3. Judith and CJ are strange choices. Their general knowledge is well below the other three, but like I've said before - they are well above average.
4. Will Chris stop going on about trains and railways - and why do so many questions regarding his pet subjects keep coming up? Is he the question-setter?
5. The set is horrible - too much like the Weakest Link.
6. Kevin and Daphne are not given the opportunity so show their talent.
7. There are not enough questions, and too much talking.
Let's be positive to begin with and state the good points:
1. It has two of the best quizzers in the country, Kevin Ashman and Daphne Fowler.
2. It shows how lucky Judith Keppel got with her Millionaire win. She is well above average for her general knowledge, but if she had to go through the 15 questions on WWTBAM again, I'd place money on her not winning - even if she had another ten attempts. But fair dos and congratulations to her.
3. You can join in with the fun and answer questions before the rest of your family. Well, usually.
4. Occasionally the opponents really do have the Eggheads on the ropes, and there is a smidgen of tension as we await the outcome.
Now, since I'm struggling to think of the good points, here are the bad points.
1. Most of the questions are pretty easy, just to give the opponents a chance, and then hope one of the Eggheads will slip up. Also, the caliber of people on the public side is pretty poor sometimes.
2. The people going on to the show should really sort out their tactics better. Play Kevin on entertainment, Daphne on sport, although these pair are pretty good on everything anyway.
3. Judith and CJ are strange choices. Their general knowledge is well below the other three, but like I've said before - they are well above average.
4. Will Chris stop going on about trains and railways - and why do so many questions regarding his pet subjects keep coming up? Is he the question-setter?
5. The set is horrible - too much like the Weakest Link.
6. Kevin and Daphne are not given the opportunity so show their talent.
7. There are not enough questions, and too much talking.
As a personal 'must see' in the early evenings here in the UK, I catch Eggheads when I can. The show at the time of posting has now been going ten years. The format is easy-going. A team of 'challengers' take on what is commonly described as 'Possibly the best team of quizzers in Britain' as the Eggheads team consists of those who have become champions in former TV quiz shows in the UK. The two 'strongest' members it has to be said are Kevin Ashman and Daphne Fowler. The show has lost CJ De Mooi who was a regular on the team.
The team(s) consist of five members, but the Eggheads team has its standard five, but others who alternate leaving two others off the team when on in the 'five'. This 'alternating' team also consists of Barry Simmons, Pat Gibson, Judith Keppel, Chris Hughes and Dave Rainford. There is talk of CJ De Mooi returning after pursuing an acting career.
The challengers' team will be asked which of their number wants to take on which Egghead as long as that one hasn't already been on (after first being asked if your team wants to go 'first or second'). If you lose the multiple choice answers (3) to the question, well you lose! If at the end of three it's a draw, then a 'sudden death' shootout takes place without the 'multiple choice' help, so the winning answers in that case have to come from the depths of your knowledge. Series have been hosted by Dermot Murnaghan and Jeremy Vine (Brother of comedian Tim vine).
The show offers a prize, per show of £1,000 but this rolls over if the challengers fail to win, by another £1,000. As mostly is the case, when the Eggheads win, this will then mean tens of thousands of pounds further down the line to a team that does beat them.
As can be seen on the message boards about Eggheads, many have their pet-hates of the Eggheads team or particular members and some are asking if it's fair, that, some of the challenging teams aren't really from a broad perspective of knowledge and thrown in to the arena without a real cat-in-hell's-chance of winning - but some have won in spectacular fashion. A team of students were once all knocked out leaving just one challenger to continue in the final against ALL the Egghead team. This challenger won through and a total of £75,000! My favourite persons are probably Judith and Pat. Others have described Chris, Daphne, Kevin, Barry and CJ as unbelievably smug and a few of that number do indeed seem to sulk at losing or show extreme annoyance! Dave seems morose but I think that's just his manner, he's not really! Chris and Barry do remind you somewhat of the dodgy uncle tucking you into bed at night Daphne can be sickening in pretending, I believe, in not knowing the answer when she does and CJ often lost his round, only to be flailing his arms around when the rest of the Eggheads don't get a question right (even though, as I say, he's often already been knocked out). A good show, just to see them lose - hee-hee-hee!
The team(s) consist of five members, but the Eggheads team has its standard five, but others who alternate leaving two others off the team when on in the 'five'. This 'alternating' team also consists of Barry Simmons, Pat Gibson, Judith Keppel, Chris Hughes and Dave Rainford. There is talk of CJ De Mooi returning after pursuing an acting career.
The challengers' team will be asked which of their number wants to take on which Egghead as long as that one hasn't already been on (after first being asked if your team wants to go 'first or second'). If you lose the multiple choice answers (3) to the question, well you lose! If at the end of three it's a draw, then a 'sudden death' shootout takes place without the 'multiple choice' help, so the winning answers in that case have to come from the depths of your knowledge. Series have been hosted by Dermot Murnaghan and Jeremy Vine (Brother of comedian Tim vine).
The show offers a prize, per show of £1,000 but this rolls over if the challengers fail to win, by another £1,000. As mostly is the case, when the Eggheads win, this will then mean tens of thousands of pounds further down the line to a team that does beat them.
As can be seen on the message boards about Eggheads, many have their pet-hates of the Eggheads team or particular members and some are asking if it's fair, that, some of the challenging teams aren't really from a broad perspective of knowledge and thrown in to the arena without a real cat-in-hell's-chance of winning - but some have won in spectacular fashion. A team of students were once all knocked out leaving just one challenger to continue in the final against ALL the Egghead team. This challenger won through and a total of £75,000! My favourite persons are probably Judith and Pat. Others have described Chris, Daphne, Kevin, Barry and CJ as unbelievably smug and a few of that number do indeed seem to sulk at losing or show extreme annoyance! Dave seems morose but I think that's just his manner, he's not really! Chris and Barry do remind you somewhat of the dodgy uncle tucking you into bed at night Daphne can be sickening in pretending, I believe, in not knowing the answer when she does and CJ often lost his round, only to be flailing his arms around when the rest of the Eggheads don't get a question right (even though, as I say, he's often already been knocked out). A good show, just to see them lose - hee-hee-hee!
Although 2003's "Eggheads" is relaxed, chatty and doesn't put half the amount of pressure "The Weakest Link" puts on its contestants, this really is quite a dull, predictable show and very incompetent when compared to "The Weakest Link" which still takes the nation by storm to this day - 6 and a half years on from its original broad-casted episode in 2000.
The presenter Dermot is nice and encouraging and everything but does he ever stop wittering on?!!! He can't keep his mouth closed for longer than 10 seconds at the most! He cannot get through a single show without dramatizing the fact that the eggheads have won again... and again... and again. Why can't he just see the simple fact that these are just ordinary people - he talks about the prim and proper Judith Keppel, the rather stuck-up, "O riff-raff, do be qwaht" smartypants CJ De Mooi who doesn't make himself look clever at all but just plain cocky, the somewhat dreary Chris Hughes (who looks as if he might fall asleep at any moment), the sweet, gentle Daphnie Fowler and Kevin Ashman as if they are all superheroes, as if they know absolutely everything, as if they are even royalty sometimes! The eggheads are seldom beaten as well! I'm sure that if this debuted in the late 1980s or something then it would look perfect upon the screen but this is 2007! Meaning it's at least 18 years out of date! Having said all of that, mind you, the youngest egghead, CJ De Mooi, would've probably been a young child back then wouldn't he? I do mildly admire this show (lifeless, predictable and exaggerative as it is), depending on what mood I'm in but it simply cannot reach the enormous standards and amazing quality of "The Weakest Link" even if they are different shows!
The presenter Dermot is nice and encouraging and everything but does he ever stop wittering on?!!! He can't keep his mouth closed for longer than 10 seconds at the most! He cannot get through a single show without dramatizing the fact that the eggheads have won again... and again... and again. Why can't he just see the simple fact that these are just ordinary people - he talks about the prim and proper Judith Keppel, the rather stuck-up, "O riff-raff, do be qwaht" smartypants CJ De Mooi who doesn't make himself look clever at all but just plain cocky, the somewhat dreary Chris Hughes (who looks as if he might fall asleep at any moment), the sweet, gentle Daphnie Fowler and Kevin Ashman as if they are all superheroes, as if they know absolutely everything, as if they are even royalty sometimes! The eggheads are seldom beaten as well! I'm sure that if this debuted in the late 1980s or something then it would look perfect upon the screen but this is 2007! Meaning it's at least 18 years out of date! Having said all of that, mind you, the youngest egghead, CJ De Mooi, would've probably been a young child back then wouldn't he? I do mildly admire this show (lifeless, predictable and exaggerative as it is), depending on what mood I'm in but it simply cannot reach the enormous standards and amazing quality of "The Weakest Link" even if they are different shows!
The questions are of a decent enough difficulty not to exclude people like university challenge does, but there are two problems with this show One is the fact that it takes too long to do anything (they need to get on with it sometimes). Everything takes place so slowly.
The largest problem is the fact that I can't help but want to punch the TV screen when I see the Eggheads' smug little faces - especially CJ, who is aim assiv tw@, not only in my opinion, it seems.
That's the problem with this premise. Sure, it's interesting and challenging to take on some of the smartest people in the country, but in watching this, you know you're massaging their egos all the way, huffing under your breath that you hate them.
The largest problem is the fact that I can't help but want to punch the TV screen when I see the Eggheads' smug little faces - especially CJ, who is aim assiv tw@, not only in my opinion, it seems.
That's the problem with this premise. Sure, it's interesting and challenging to take on some of the smartest people in the country, but in watching this, you know you're massaging their egos all the way, huffing under your breath that you hate them.
Did you know
- ConnectionsFeatured in The Royle Family: Barbara's Old Ring (2012)
Details
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content