Boys
- 2003
- 2h 52m
IMDb RATING
7.2/10
4.4K
YOUR RATING
'Boys' is the story of five boys and a girl from different families They are youthful, vibrant, careless violating all conventions and In the process, they discover their hidden talents.'Boys' is the story of five boys and a girl from different families They are youthful, vibrant, careless violating all conventions and In the process, they discover their hidden talents.'Boys' is the story of five boys and a girl from different families They are youthful, vibrant, careless violating all conventions and In the process, they discover their hidden talents.
- Awards
- 1 nomination total
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
S. Shankar has gained quite a reputation for making expensive crapfest. I have only seen his 'Indian' and 'Nayak, The Real Hero' and loathe both movies (though they have great soundtracks and female leads). Little did I know that he directed 'Boys'. After watching the movie I must give him some credit for making something that is at least watchable.
'Boys' starts off as an entertaining teen flick following six teenagers but the story slowly progresses as the protagonists move into adulthood, a little too fast, and then the movie tackles various social issues. Themes like friendship, sex, censorship and injustice are well presented here. 'Boys' is considered a poignant film for the middle-class Indians.
The humour works very well. One can easily relate to the various situations the teenagers experience. However, the more intense sequences are loud and overdone. They appear theatrical and melodramatic.
A.R. Rahman's score is terrific. The visualization of the first two songs and the romantic songs is very poor. The special effects used in the songs are awful. The lyrics of the romantic songs are clichéd but the rest of the songs have great lyrics. I especially liked the last one, 'Secret of My Success'.
S.Shankar has cast an ensemble of newcomers and the five actors who play the title role, Siddharth, Nakul, Bharath, Sai Srinivas, and Manigandan, all perform very well especially in the comedic sequences but they ham it up in the more intense scenes. Genelia D'Souza is competent. Vivek is likable as the supportive Mangalam Sir.
'Boys' is almost three hours long and it could have used some editing. Yet, it's still an enjoyable watch despite the aforementioned as long as you have a working fast-forward button on your remote control. I'm surprised that the man behind abysmal tripe like 'Indian' and 'Nayak' came up with something more 'human'.
'Boys' starts off as an entertaining teen flick following six teenagers but the story slowly progresses as the protagonists move into adulthood, a little too fast, and then the movie tackles various social issues. Themes like friendship, sex, censorship and injustice are well presented here. 'Boys' is considered a poignant film for the middle-class Indians.
The humour works very well. One can easily relate to the various situations the teenagers experience. However, the more intense sequences are loud and overdone. They appear theatrical and melodramatic.
A.R. Rahman's score is terrific. The visualization of the first two songs and the romantic songs is very poor. The special effects used in the songs are awful. The lyrics of the romantic songs are clichéd but the rest of the songs have great lyrics. I especially liked the last one, 'Secret of My Success'.
S.Shankar has cast an ensemble of newcomers and the five actors who play the title role, Siddharth, Nakul, Bharath, Sai Srinivas, and Manigandan, all perform very well especially in the comedic sequences but they ham it up in the more intense scenes. Genelia D'Souza is competent. Vivek is likable as the supportive Mangalam Sir.
'Boys' is almost three hours long and it could have used some editing. Yet, it's still an enjoyable watch despite the aforementioned as long as you have a working fast-forward button on your remote control. I'm surprised that the man behind abysmal tripe like 'Indian' and 'Nayak' came up with something more 'human'.
10princely
Hey guyz, I did watch the movie Boys. I dont care what others says about the movie. But i just wanna sat that the movie is EXCELLENT and it's backbone is ARR's music. Every song was fantastic taken esp SECRET OF SUCCESS was just simply mind blowing. This movie is especiallly made for teens. Keep up the good work for the team of Boys, esp. A.R Rahman & Shankar!!!
Why such a big fuss about Boys nowadays. Why do people watch movie? Why do people make movies? The latter question is to satisfy audience and the former for the audience to be entertained. Simple isn't it. Again Thamazhan population is the one that Q's to the theatre no matter whatever the story is just to see how their hero has given dialogues/ dance & fight. Again, directors can give variety of family entertainers & come with unique formulae blending story to satisfy people from 6 to 60 yrs of age. I have seen movies of many Indian languages of which I find Bengali films to be of artistic nature. Following that would be Tamil movies which has its own target audience of artistic creativity & masala formulae hits. Sure enough for many tamil movies to be adapted or dubbed into Hindi or other languages. The technicians are some of the most talented people India can be proud of. Cinematographers, Directors, Music Directors, Lyricists etc can have their share at the world stage.
But now the generation gap is increasing & I don't think in family pot boilers to satisfy 6 to 60yrs will work out in a liberalised society. Different genres should be created and presented to audience. Directors should be welcomed to experiment with bold topics as what they are doing in Hindi nowadays. In that way we can be very proud of Shankar, AR Rahman, Mani Ratnam & Kamal Hassan to be contributing to the artistic nature of Indian cinema & having their signature mark on it.
Why such a big fuss about Boys nowadays. Why do people watch movie? Why do people make movies? The latter question is to satisfy audience and the former for the audience to be entertained. Simple isn't it. Again Thamazhan population is the one that Q's to the theatre no matter whatever the story is just to see how their hero has given dialogues/ dance & fight. Again, directors can give variety of family entertainers & come with unique formulae blending story to satisfy people from 6 to 60 yrs of age. I have seen movies of many Indian languages of which I find Bengali films to be of artistic nature. Following that would be Tamil movies which has its own target audience of artistic creativity & masala formulae hits. Sure enough for many tamil movies to be adapted or dubbed into Hindi or other languages. The technicians are some of the most talented people India can be proud of. Cinematographers, Directors, Music Directors, Lyricists etc can have their share at the world stage.
But now the generation gap is increasing & I don't think in family pot boilers to satisfy 6 to 60yrs will work out in a liberalised society. Different genres should be created and presented to audience. Directors should be welcomed to experiment with bold topics as what they are doing in Hindi nowadays. In that way we can be very proud of Shankar, AR Rahman, Mani Ratnam & Kamal Hassan to be contributing to the artistic nature of Indian cinema & having their signature mark on it.
Boys!!! It is agreed that it hoists the best in every scene. But when I finished seeing the movie I thought that there is still something to come. And some of the scenes are over imaginative, when considering the masses for whom the film is taken. And Of Course!!! there are copy from many Hollywood films, for example driving bike in opposite direction in the road(MATRIX), a disgusting scene including first boy with the prostitute(Forrest Gump) and the dance sequences which are copied mostly from TV music channels.
The sexual content of this movie may pioneer the way to most of the films yet to come. The song having the couple dancing in junked place with bottles and bats are a poor imagination and rotten graphics. Shankar-no more audiences like you old style graphics in songs.
AR Rahmans songs and the camera lifts the film. The actors don't do much coz they try to act natural.
On the whole its worth seeing it once for not seeing it again. Coz its a special movie!!! :-)
Boys is a movie of Chain of what the director thinks are good scenes
5/10
The sexual content of this movie may pioneer the way to most of the films yet to come. The song having the couple dancing in junked place with bottles and bats are a poor imagination and rotten graphics. Shankar-no more audiences like you old style graphics in songs.
AR Rahmans songs and the camera lifts the film. The actors don't do much coz they try to act natural.
On the whole its worth seeing it once for not seeing it again. Coz its a special movie!!! :-)
Boys is a movie of Chain of what the director thinks are good scenes
5/10
Boys," the 2003 Tamil film directed by Shankar, might not have been a massive hit at the time of its release, but it's a movie that has aged surprisingly well. Back then, it was criticized for its bold portrayal of youth culture, relationships, and the rebellion against societal norms. However, in today's context, where audiences are more open to exploring different narratives, "Boys" could easily find its place as a cult classic.
The film centers around a group of college friends Munna, Babu, Juju, Kumar, and Krishna who are carefree and deeply entrenched in their youthful exuberance. Their lives take a dramatic turn when Munna falls in love with Harini, leading to a series of events that test their friendships, dreams, and relationships. The movie doesn't shy away from exploring themes like love, lust, ambition, and the consequences of impulsive decisions.
One of the film's highlights is its music, composed by A. R. Rahman. The soundtrack of "Boys" was groundbreaking at the time, with tracks like "Girlfriend," "Dating," and "Secret of Success" becoming instant hits. Rahman's music perfectly captures the energy and spirit of the youth, and even today, the songs are enjoyed by fans across generations.
Comedian Vivek's role as Mangalam, a street-smart marriage broker and bank employee, is another standout element of the film. His witty one-liners and impeccable timing provide much-needed comic relief amidst the drama. Vivek's character also serves as a voice of reason, often delivering sharp critiques of society's hypocrisy, which resonates even more today.
The movie's portrayal of friendship and the struggles of young adults is something that many can relate to, even after two decades. The way the film addresses issues like parental pressure, career choices, and the clash between tradition and modernity was ahead of its time. If "Boys" were released now, it would likely be appreciated for its boldness and the way it challenges outdated mindsets.
Yes, the film has its flaws, with some scenes and dialogues feeling a bit over the top. However, it's important to view "Boys" through the lens of the era it was made in. The movie dared to be different, and while it may not have been perfect, it certainly wasn't as bad as many critics made it out to be. In fact, it's a film that grows on you with repeated viewings.
In conclusion, "Boys" is a film that deserves a second chance. With A. R. Rahman's incredible music, Vivek's perfect comedic timing, and a storyline that resonates with the struggles of youth, it's a movie that could very well have been a blockbuster if it had been released in today's more accepting and open-minded climate.
The film centers around a group of college friends Munna, Babu, Juju, Kumar, and Krishna who are carefree and deeply entrenched in their youthful exuberance. Their lives take a dramatic turn when Munna falls in love with Harini, leading to a series of events that test their friendships, dreams, and relationships. The movie doesn't shy away from exploring themes like love, lust, ambition, and the consequences of impulsive decisions.
One of the film's highlights is its music, composed by A. R. Rahman. The soundtrack of "Boys" was groundbreaking at the time, with tracks like "Girlfriend," "Dating," and "Secret of Success" becoming instant hits. Rahman's music perfectly captures the energy and spirit of the youth, and even today, the songs are enjoyed by fans across generations.
Comedian Vivek's role as Mangalam, a street-smart marriage broker and bank employee, is another standout element of the film. His witty one-liners and impeccable timing provide much-needed comic relief amidst the drama. Vivek's character also serves as a voice of reason, often delivering sharp critiques of society's hypocrisy, which resonates even more today.
The movie's portrayal of friendship and the struggles of young adults is something that many can relate to, even after two decades. The way the film addresses issues like parental pressure, career choices, and the clash between tradition and modernity was ahead of its time. If "Boys" were released now, it would likely be appreciated for its boldness and the way it challenges outdated mindsets.
Yes, the film has its flaws, with some scenes and dialogues feeling a bit over the top. However, it's important to view "Boys" through the lens of the era it was made in. The movie dared to be different, and while it may not have been perfect, it certainly wasn't as bad as many critics made it out to be. In fact, it's a film that grows on you with repeated viewings.
In conclusion, "Boys" is a film that deserves a second chance. With A. R. Rahman's incredible music, Vivek's perfect comedic timing, and a storyline that resonates with the struggles of youth, it's a movie that could very well have been a blockbuster if it had been released in today's more accepting and open-minded climate.
Boys is about Music , friendship ,love, Ambition , goal. There r many elements in movie which will win our hearts. Especially post interval. The struggle of boys is shown in a beautiful way and screenplay is perfectly bent. And AR Rahman songs are biggest plus. They added complete flavour to the movie. Ofcourse it's a musical story. And shankar's visioy is too good. It can bee seen all the way in movie. Supporting actors did well. Siddharth is perfect. Genelia is impressive. Its not like regular drama. Its something different from routine. Locations are ok. Watch it.
Did you know
- TriviaThis movie suffered extensive censorship throughout its airing at cinema theaters. While for the first few days it was uncensored, it became less and less enjoyable as the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), India, made 17 cuts. The most well known cut was the deleted visuals and dialogs of Juju with the prostitute as he shakes the cot up to the dialog of Bobgali "please please konjam utkarungalen". This scene was shown in the trailer and was one of the most memorable portions of the film.
- ConnectionsFeatures Dil Chahta Hai (2001)
- How long is Boys?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Танцоры диско
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross worldwide
- $2,028,752
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content