[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Los Angeles Plays Itself

  • 2003
  • Not Rated
  • 2h 49m
IMDb RATING
7.8/10
3K
YOUR RATING
Los Angeles Plays Itself (2003)
Trailer for Los Angeles Plays Itself
Play trailer1:21
2 Videos
1 Photo
DocumentaryHistory

A documentary on how Los Angeles has been used and depicted in the movies.A documentary on how Los Angeles has been used and depicted in the movies.A documentary on how Los Angeles has been used and depicted in the movies.

  • Director
    • Thom Andersen
  • Writer
    • Thom Andersen
  • Stars
    • Encke King
    • Ben Alexander
    • Jim Backus
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    7.8/10
    3K
    YOUR RATING
    • Director
      • Thom Andersen
    • Writer
      • Thom Andersen
    • Stars
      • Encke King
      • Ben Alexander
      • Jim Backus
    • 42User reviews
    • 53Critic reviews
    • 86Metascore
  • See production info at IMDbPro
    • Awards
      • 3 wins & 1 nomination total

    Videos2

    Los Angeles Plays Itself
    Trailer 1:21
    Los Angeles Plays Itself
    Los Angeles Plays Itself (trailer)
    Trailer 1:22
    Los Angeles Plays Itself (trailer)
    Los Angeles Plays Itself (trailer)
    Trailer 1:22
    Los Angeles Plays Itself (trailer)

    Photos

    Top cast86

    Edit
    Encke King
    • Narrator
    • (voice)
    Ben Alexander
    Ben Alexander
    • Officer Frank Smith in Dragnet
    • (archive footage)
    • (uncredited)
    Jim Backus
    Jim Backus
    • Frank Stark in Rebel Without A Cause
    • (archive footage)
    • (uncredited)
    Brenda Bakke
    Brenda Bakke
    • Lana Turner in L.A. Confidential
    • (archive footage)
    • (uncredited)
    Gene Barry
    Gene Barry
    • Dr. Clayton Forrester
    • (archive footage)
    • (uncredited)
    Richard Basehart
    Richard Basehart
    • Roy Morgan
    • (archive footage)
    • (uncredited)
    • …
    Hugh Beaumont
    Hugh Beaumont
    • George Copeland in The Blue Dahlia
    • (archive footage)
    • (uncredited)
    William Bendix
    William Bendix
    • Buzz Wanchek in The Blue Dahlia
    • (archive footage)
    • (uncredited)
    Ann Blyth
    Ann Blyth
    • Veda Pierce in Mildred Pierce
    • (archive footage)
    • (uncredited)
    Jim Bouton
    Jim Bouton
    • Terry Lennox in The Long Goodbye
    • (archive footage)
    • (uncredited)
    Grand L. Bush
    Grand L. Bush
    • FBI Agent Little Johnson in Die Hard
    • (archive footage)
    • (uncredited)
    James Cagney
    James Cagney
    • Tom Powers in The Public Enemy
    • (archive footage)
    • (uncredited)
    Lon Chaney Jr.
    Lon Chaney Jr.
    • Charles 'Butcher' Benton in The Indestructible Man
    • (archive footage)
    • (uncredited)
    John Considine
    John Considine
    • Doctor Crawford
    • (archive footage)
    • (uncredited)
    • …
    Bill Cosby
    Bill Cosby
    • Al Hickey in Hickey & Boggs
    • (archive footage)
    • (uncredited)
    Robert Culp
    Robert Culp
    • Frank Boggs in Hickey & Boggs
    • (archive footage)
    • (uncredited)
    Howard Duff
    Howard Duff
    • Dave Pomeroy in Panic in the City
    • (archive footage)
    • (uncredited)
    Deanna Durbin
    Deanna Durbin
    • Penny in Three Smart Girls
    • (archive footage)
    • (uncredited)
    • Director
      • Thom Andersen
    • Writer
      • Thom Andersen
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews42

    7.83K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    9pwiancko

    Los Angeles

    A fantastic film covering all of the bases of the way in which Los Angeles is seen through the eyes of Hollywood. Full of wonderful insights, this film is an in depth study more than it is a crowd-pleaser. Also a great source of information for film-buffs...a plethora of little-known facts and behind-the-scenes information. Some of the movies are blockbusters, others you may not have ever heard of, but each film that Thom Anderson studies and quotes proves to be a unique take on the subject. If you love DVD special features, you will love this movie. If you love Los Angeles, you will love this movie. If you HATE Los Angeles, you will love this movie. If you don't know yet, or know nothing about LA, get your hands on a copy of this movie. It will make it easier to decide.
    8mjcfoxx

    Don't Call It L.A.

    For a three hour documentary about a town that houses 10 million and looks dusty and dirty even when it's at its pristine and pretentious best, this is some compelling stuff. The droll voice of the narrator (Encke King- please tell me that's a pseudonym for the documentary's creator, Thom Anderson) expounds the essay like a cynical alcoholic history professor might talk about the Arapahoe during a Friday night session in which you were hoping to deal with no more important topics than whose breasts look best on GoT or what's up with Jets QB situation. And you'll listen to him because what he says makes sense. Yes, Hollywood is full of overprivileged white guys who pretend the city they live in doesn't exist outside of their fortress-like movie studios and bougie Bel-Air penthouses. I myself lived in Los Angeles for a year, and Hollywood is more of an odor than a thing. You get a faint whiff of it from time to time, but for the most part, Los Angeles is a place where underprivileged multi-ethnic people scrape out a living and pay too much for it. Every single Asian country is represented there (China, Japan, Korea, Cambodia, Vietnam, Laos, the Phillipines, all of 'em), and of course a good 1/3 of it is Mexican (and you can't forget how many black people live there...). It's a melting pot.

    Anderson includes a history of Los Angeles by showing how the filmed history got everything wrong and he expounds on the cops and how they're portrayed. His essay sounds like what it is: a tenured film professor being overly critical and at times pseudo-intelligent about an industry borne of immigrants when at its best... which is hilarious given how kind he is to anyone obviously not born in America, as though their portrayal of Los Angeles is more honest because they don't pretend to know anything about it (or probably care all that much-- I lived there, and I never found a reason to care about it. It was a just a place with a lot of people and not a particularly inviting one). This would probably be labeled communist propaganda if it came out during the 50s with how much it seems to disdain anyone who isn't working class or below. Which would be more admirable if the filmmaker was just some guy who watched a lot of movies while he scraped out a living repairing motorcycles in Simi Valley and not some coddled condescending liberal who's been sucking at the film school teat since the 60s.

    And yet, I give it an 8. The guy does know his stuff.
    gortx

    A most personal view of Los Angeles viewed through the Movies

    In much the same spirit as Martin Scorsese's "Mio viaggio in Italia" (1999), Thom Andersen's "visual lecture" on his native Los Angeles is a very personal journey. Because of rights issues involved in procuring clips from dozens and dozens of films, this project is unlikely to ever be seen outside of Museums, Cinemateques, and 'academic' settings, so you will have to actively seek it out if you want to see it. It is worth doing so - with reservations.

    Because it is such a personal odyssey, nobody is likely to agree with all of it, and that would suit Director Andersen just fine. I guess I could be categorized as a "tourist who stayed" in the vernacular of Andersen's thesis. I grew up in Boston, and moved to Los Angeles in my early 20's. Therefore, MY LOS ANGELES is different from Andersen's. I don't get my back up when the city is referred to as "L.A.", but Andersen pointedly does. He finds it a derogatory and dismissive term that is used as a weapon by outsiders and tourists. As local film critic Andy Klein points out, Americans don't seem to have the same issue when it comes to the abbreviation "U.S.A.", so why is "L.A." so offensive? And, though many locals DO object, "Frisco", "D.C.","NYC", "SLC"and other similar abbreviations are becoming more and more common in our less literal society.

    Some of the clips which Andersen employs last only a few seconds - acting as veritable Still Photos of certain views of the city (representing a variety of eras as well). Andersen is laudably conscientious in identifying ALL the clips used (sometimes this is a distraction; especially in those briefest of shots). Oddly, the brevity of those shots actually spurred me to wish the film were EVEN LONGER (the most common criticism of the film is that it is too long as is). Still, by the end, a remarkable portrait of a city does emerge. But, being the home of "Hollywood" (a term which also rankles Andersen - especially when it is used interchangeably with the main city itself), Los Angeles doesn't seem to exist in the world's eyes as separate from the Film Industry.

    The biggest problem with the film is the narration (not Andersen's voice as others have often mentioned). Andersen is given to make sharp declarative sentences, that are too often contradicted not only by reality - but by the clips in his own movie! For instance, he makes a point about the haze over the city and declares that films ALWAYS have a gauzy look when showing Los Angeles - then provides clips which show the sharp sunny vistas (think BAYWATCH) that attract hordes of visitors and tourists. More problematically, Andersen is a 'neighborhood' guy who not only derides Hollywood, but seemingly anywhere west of Vine. For someone who is declaring love for his native city, it is odd that he dismisses vast swatches of it! Curious too, is that Andersen knowingly adopts the view of "outsiders" to the city (and the film industry) as he levies specious arguments to why "Hollywood" is so phony in its depiction of the city. Andersen certainly is better informed, but feigns ignorance to make his point.

    The final portion of the movie brings Andersen's agitprop view into focus. To Andersen, racism is the dark underside of Los Angeles. As a so-called 'liberal Westsider', I have sympathy with much of what Andersen espouses (especially his parsing of the term "Nobody walks in L.A."), but it changes the focus of the film (not to mention the explosive and divisive use of a term like "genocide" to define public policy).

    Again, one wishes the film were longer in order to explore some of these issues touched upon. Also, Andersen should have done another pass in the editing room. Not in terms of length, but in terms of some of the obvious contradictions in his narration vs. reality/movie clips. And , a cheap shot at George Kennedy (obviously an attempt to inject humor in the dry commentary) is not worthy of such a high-minded project (curiously, Andersen misses an opportunity to needle Kennedy again in a later BLUE KNIGHT clip). On a technical note, I must say I was disappointed that it is a Video Production (as many of the most extraordinary pieces of Cinematography are marred by a fuzzy video-dupe look) -- all the while understanding the financial and logistical reasons it is so.
    chaos-rampant

    Moviescapes

    This is one of the most interesting projects about cinema (as the filmed frame) that I know of. It is about the city as background, as character and subject. They were making as far back as the 1920's films as hymns to the cityscape and what life in it, 'city symphonies' they called them, but here it is about the most photographed city in the world. A place that was nothing more than a small town when the dream factories rolled in and shaped it into a myth that sustains itself. And it's entirely in terms of cinematic history, entirely cobbled together from other peoples' vision of that place.

    So the essay is about the history of a city as reflected in cinema and shaped by it, about Hollywood's idea of Los Angeles overlapping with the actual place where real people live. The filmmaker has compiled clips from a large array of films; from silents and noir to 80's action and modern blockbusters. The idea is that we're looking at the background of these shots, at the actual reality and place over which is superimposed the movie fantasy.

    Various insights here, ranging from the stridently interprative to the intuitively discerning. It amuses the narrator for example, how modernist architectural houses built to signify transparence are turned by movies into the dens of iniquity of shady characters simply because they look weird from the outside. How the same building could substitute as a hotel, a police station, and a newspaper office depending on the movie. How the disappearance of entire neighborhoods can be actually traced in the footage of movies filmed there. Bunker Hill was a busy, homely district where pensioners and poor immigrants lived in the late 50's, but in '84 it substitutes well as a desolate urban wasteland in Night of the Comet.

    And a more interesting one. How cinema imagined in Chinatown or Who Framed Roger Rabbit, perhaps reflecting public opinion, devious schemes by shady groups of plutocrats to usurp control of the water or public transport, while the actual reality was banal; these things happened, or efforts towards them, but in the public eye and with its support.
    maartenwinters

    A well thought out movie, but few visitors last till part 3

    I watched this movie at the 'Rotterdam Film Festival' in The Netherlands and beforehand had no idea what to expect. After a few minutes it became clear to me that the movie was a collection of hundreds of movie-fragments, all located in the city of Los Angeles. Being a movie freak I was very interested from that point on, and Thomas Anderson didn't let me down. A terrible amount of time and research must have been spent making this movie, and it pays off! Having been in L.A. myself I really liked all places that are shown in the movie, and all movie-fragments being shown. Unfortunately, a lot (I think to many) of old movie fragments are shown (1950-1960), which makes it a little 'unrecognizable', at least for me. After part two of the movie, I had seen so many peaces of 'old material', and together with listening 2 hours to the voice of Mr. Anderson, I became to tired to go for the 3rd hour. Nevertheless, I can really recommend this movie to anyone who likes watching movies, and likes learning more about them and about a city that was so very important in movie making!

    More like this

    Le saut dans le vide
    6.7
    Le saut dans le vide
    L'ombre d'un nuage
    6.8
    L'ombre d'un nuage
    Per una rosa
    6.1
    Per una rosa
    Paradis: Espoir
    6.6
    Paradis: Espoir
    La lampe au chapeau
    7.5
    La lampe au chapeau
    Cameraperson
    7.4
    Cameraperson
    Jill, Uncredited
    7.2
    Jill, Uncredited
    The Thoughts That Once We Had
    7.2
    The Thoughts That Once We Had
    Plastic Semiotic
    6.4
    Plastic Semiotic
    Adieu Philippine
    6.9
    Adieu Philippine
    Stane
    6.5
    Stane
    Safari
    7.0
    Safari

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Goofs
      The narration describes architect John Lautner's famous Chemosphere house as "a hexagon of wood, steel, and glass." The Chemosphere is octagonal.
    • Connections
      Featured in MsMojo: Top 10 Movies to Watch if You Liked La La Land (2017)
    • Soundtracks
      Lost Dream Blues
      Written by Johnny Otis

      Performed by Esther Phillips & the Johnny Otis Band

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    FAQ

    • How long is Los Angeles Plays Itself?
      Powered by Alexa

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • July 7, 2004 (France)
    • Country of origin
      • United States
    • Language
      • English
    • Also known as
      • Los Angeles Kendini Oynuyor
    • Filming locations
      • Ennis House - 2607 Glendower Avenue, Los Feliz, Los Angeles, California, USA(Stock Footage)
    • Production company
      • Thom Andersen Productions
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Box office

    Edit
    • Gross US & Canada
      • $6,945
    • Opening weekend US & Canada
      • $5,005
      • Aug 1, 2004
    • Gross worldwide
      • $8,218
    See detailed box office info on IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      2 hours 49 minutes
    • Color
      • Black and White
      • Color

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    Los Angeles Plays Itself (2003)
    Top Gap
    By what name was Los Angeles Plays Itself (2003) officially released in India in English?
    Answer
    • See more gaps
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.