The Stranger Beside Me

Overall, this movie is "meh." It lacks accuracy. Many of the quotes are presented out of context. Events are portrayed incorrectly or out of order. It was pretty typical of a made-for-tv movie, which is probably why it went direct to dvd. All that aside, Billy Campbell does the best interpretation of Bundy I've seen in all of the movies about him. He captures the chameleon nature of the man by constantly changing his hairstyle and facial expressions. His voice mimics Bundy's well. So it is worth a watch just to see Campbell.

This film absolutely nothing like the truth. For starters it glosses over the ineptitude of the police, leaves out crucial and well known events (including murders and Bundy's post-murder habits), and plays out like a soap.

The acting is boring and often bad, the events that are portrayed are skidded over which gives everything a feeling of unimportance, and the tone of the film is just flat.

Instead of watching this you should watch documentaries and read books and find out as much as possible about what happened.

The other reviews basically nailed it on the head I didn't enjoy the film but I do want to mention that the only thing good about it in my opinion was Billy Campbell's betrayal of Ted Bundy although I would say he would comes in second to Michael Riley Burke's performance in the 2002 film "Ted Bundy". One of the best performances I've ever seen in film in regards to an actor's portrayal of real person.

This was a well written story, however there were a tremendous amount of scenes out of sync with the film. For example, the scene is set in 1975 yet everyone is at a juice bar located inside a gym (which didn't become popular until the late 1980's) and everyone was dressed like it was 1990 something. Then, the 1988 version of Standing On Shaky Ground plays in the background..then Ted, the only person dressed like the 70's midst the large group dressed like skaters from the 1990's, suddenly stands up and walks out into the parking garage where we see cars ranging from 1972 to 1978, exactly 3 years into the future. The movie is well done however whoever made these mistakes was pretty blind. I can understand a few errors in the film here and there and I do not expect perfection, but if you have a movie set in the 70's, don't include fashions and music and hair styles from 20 years into the future.

The only thing really worth noting about this wildly inaccurate and misleading movie is Billy Campbell's portrayal of Ted Bundy. Of the various movies about Bundy there have been through the years, Campbell's performance as Bundy is one of the better versions, but that's about where it ends. Bundy and Ann Rule were not "close friends" nor did they have anything other than a co-worker relationship for a short time. Bundy was nothing more than a fraud and a poseur and yet he's often portrayed as some overachieving success story and nothing could be further from the truth. Someone here even referred to him as a "criminal mastermind." Nonsense. Inform yourself.

What bothered me most about this movie is that none of the victims real names were used and they should never be forgotten. Rule uses their names in her book, so why not in the movie? Even though his victims were many, the crime that ultimately sent Bundy to the electric chair was the murder of a 12 year old Florida girl named Kimberly Leach and her murder isn't even mentioned in the movie. As another reviewer suggested, for an accurate and detailed accounting of Bundy and his crimes, read the book or watch a documentary. There are many out there. I especially recommend the book published in 2023 by Chi Omega survivor Kathy Kleiner Rubin.