[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Ginger Snaps : Aux origines du mal

Original title: Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning
  • 2004
  • R
  • 1h 34m
IMDb RATING
5.8/10
12K
YOUR RATING
Katharine Isabelle and Emily Perkins in Ginger Snaps : Aux origines du mal (2004)
Werewolf HorrorDramaHorrorThriller

Set in 19th Century Canada, Brigette and her sister Ginger take refuge in a Traders' Fort which later becomes under siege by some savage werewolves.Set in 19th Century Canada, Brigette and her sister Ginger take refuge in a Traders' Fort which later becomes under siege by some savage werewolves.Set in 19th Century Canada, Brigette and her sister Ginger take refuge in a Traders' Fort which later becomes under siege by some savage werewolves.

  • Director
    • Grant Harvey
  • Writers
    • Christina Ray
    • Stephen Massicotte
  • Stars
    • Katharine Isabelle
    • Emily Perkins
    • Nathaniel Arcand
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    5.8/10
    12K
    YOUR RATING
    • Director
      • Grant Harvey
    • Writers
      • Christina Ray
      • Stephen Massicotte
    • Stars
      • Katharine Isabelle
      • Emily Perkins
      • Nathaniel Arcand
    • 102User reviews
    • 40Critic reviews
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • See production info at IMDbPro
    • Awards
      • 1 nomination total

    Videos1

    Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning
    Trailer 2:02
    Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning

    Photos146

    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    + 141
    View Poster

    Top cast16

    Edit
    Katharine Isabelle
    Katharine Isabelle
    • Ginger
    Emily Perkins
    Emily Perkins
    • Brigitte
    Nathaniel Arcand
    Nathaniel Arcand
    • Hunter
    JR Bourne
    JR Bourne
    • James
    Hugh Dillon
    Hugh Dillon
    • Reverend Gilbert
    Adrien Dorval
    Adrien Dorval
    • Seamus
    Brendan Fletcher
    Brendan Fletcher
    • Finn
    David La Haye
    David La Haye
    • Claude
    • (as David LaHaye)
    Tom McCamus
    Tom McCamus
    • Wallace Rowlands
    Matthew Walker
    Matthew Walker
    • Doc Murphy
    Fabian Bird
    • Milo
    Kirk Jarrett
    Kirk Jarrett
    • Owen
    David MacInnis
    David MacInnis
    • Cormac
    Stevie Mitchell
    • Geoffrey
    Edna Rain
    • Elder
    Jake McKinnon
    Jake McKinnon
    • Hellhound
    • (uncredited)
    • Director
      • Grant Harvey
    • Writers
      • Christina Ray
      • Stephen Massicotte
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews102

    5.812.1K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    5LeonLouisRicci

    Painfully Slow

    Origin Stories are Cool, most of the time. But in the Original Ginger Snaps the Origin was Original enough to make it the Sleeper Hit of its Era. It was sharp, smart, and, yes, snappy. This Movie is none of the above, it is dull, depressing, and slow.

    It looks good and there seemed to be some Energy in the Production but it all gets lost in a wildly muddled Script. The Characters are all bland and the Native American Curse stuff is painful and confusing. Our two Sisters huddle together forever and look out of place and out of time/space.

    An unwanted and ill received mess, this is not horrible but really takes an effort to like. A shame, because the Audience is with this from the beginning. Bringing along previous thoughts and anxieties from the first two Movies that had a genuine allure.

    This one is Soul less with rough edges that are never smoothed into a believable and exciting Film. It tries way too hard to be a Profound Period Piece, adding depth to the Trilogy. In the end it is an unwelcome miss on most levels, but Horror Fans may give it a Pass. Ginger Snap Fans may give it a Fail.
    8rob30316

    A great movie in its own right

    Neither sequel has been nearly as good as the original, but considering how brilliant "Ginger Snaps" was, no one could reasonably expect that. Actually, my main disappointment with both sequels is that I wanted what GS had--horror, humor, hipness, irony. But anytime there's a sequel that tries to be the original, it fails because it tried to emulate the first installment. Both sequels have completely different story lines and character. The only real continuity is in the characterization and the themes. And that's a brilliant decision. I probably liked "The Beginning" better than "Unleashed," but I just finished watching the former, so I can't be objective. It is, in its own right, a really terrific film. All of the films have had their fair share of visual panache, but this one is so beautiful it reminded me of "Sleepy Hollow" at times. I almost wish they'd been released under completely different titles--I can't help but compare the sequels to the original, and they're not really sequels. They all feature the same two leading actress; they're all about werewolves; "Unleashed" even picks up after the first left off. But you could watch "Unleashed" without having seen "Ginger Snaps" and still know what's going on, and since the third starts close to 200 years before the first, you obviously don't have to see the others. They're separate films connected by actresses and themes, as I see it. Speaking of the actresses--Emily Perkins and Isabelle Katherine are, of course, beyond reproach. Their direction is wrong; they don't fit in to the milieu they're put in, but I think that's a director error. Or the director's way of maintaining the integrity of the characters we know from the first two movies. Ginger and Bridget can't exactly be Puritans, can they? Next to the drop-dead brilliant score Mike Shields composed for the original, this soundtrack doesn't stand a chance. But it works very, very well with the setting and the action. I had to watch one scene towards the end (the fire) twice only because of the music. One thing I absolutely loved, though found a bit campy--Ginger spends half the movie dressed as Little Red Riding Hood, though her hood, and the rest of her clothes, are black...It makes for some stunning cinematography, though. So basically, after "Ginger Snaps," it's a bit of a letdown. But not taking the original into account, it's an incredible film that you shouldn't miss.
    6matt-1252

    Watchable, but shallow

    What made the original Ginger Snaps a classic horror movie is the way it used the genre to explore universal themes. It offered a unique take on sibling rivalry, death, suicide, puberty, feminism, sexuality and love. Most poignantly, it gave us Ginger, a complex character with a genuine hatred of herself and everything around her.

    Ginger Snaps also introduced Katharine Isabelle and Emily Perkins, two talented, beautiful and utterly believable actresses. So while I was a bit put off by the premise of Ginger Snaps Back, I was excited for the chance to watch the girls reprise their roles.

    Ginger Snaps Back is a very watchable movie. It re-imagines the sisters in a different era, which is interesting. It's creepy. The special effects are much better than in the original. The climax is very cool. And the sisters are both perfectly portrayed. Unfortunately, when it was over, I wasn't thinking about my own mortality. I was just thinking, "Hey, cool werewolves."

    I was also irritated by the dialog. Most of the time, the characters speak in stilted sentences appropriate to the era. But occasionally, Ginger drops a pithy one liner or a curse word which seems completely out of place.

    The supporting cast was filled with stereotypes. The harsh minister and the sage native American hunter were especially flat.

    Ginger Snaps Back gives you two things. An entertaining werewolf movie. And an excuse to watch two talented actresses portray Ginger and Brigitte. But it doesn't give you anything beyond that.
    8claudio_carvalho

    Great Beginning of a Curse

    In 1815, in Canada, the sisters Ginger (Katharine Isabelle) and Brigitte (Emily Perkins) survive to a boat sinking, where her parents die. Alone and lost in the forest, they meet an old clairvoyant Indian that foresees their fate. Later, they are guided by the Indian The Hunter (Nathaniel Arcand) to a fort, and they seek for shelter with the men of the Northern Legion Trading Company. They note that the place is under siege of "Wendigos", a sort of werewolf that has killed most of the dwellers of the place, and the survivals are very afraid. Their lives are put in danger by the deranged locals and by the surrounding beasts.

    I usually hate sequels and remakes, but "Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning" is a great movie and I liked it more than the cult "Ginger Snaps". The cold cinematography is very sad and beautiful. The good story try to explain the curse of the two sisters, but is completely different from "Ginger Snaps" and "Ginger Snaps: Unleashed". It uses only the characters of Ginger and Brigitte, and werewolves of course, taking place in different time and situations. The costumes of the sisters, specially the dark "Little Red Riding Hood" clothes of Ginger, are scary and complete the atmosphere imposing a sort of fear. The make-up of the werewolves is excellent. The DVD is full of Extras. Therefore, I liked this film a lot and highly recommend it to the fans of these cult characters. My vote is eight.

    Title (Brazil): "Possuída – O Início" ("Possessed – The Beginning")
    6mbworm

    An effort without any heart

    After the success of the superior werewolf thriller "Ginger Snaps", it seems Lions Gate rushed to churn out two sequels in the shortest amount of time possible, those being the frightening "Ginger Snaps 2: Unleashed" and the disappointing "Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning". Where "Unleashed" was a bit of letdown compared to its predecessor, it made sense and it followed the storyline well and even managed to wrangle up a boatload of genuine scares. Then there's "Ginger Snaps Back", the weakest and wholly unnecessary entry into the series. It should have stopped with "Unleashed" but the writers have decided to give our doomed heroines Brigitte and Ginger one last go around.

    This time Ginger and Brigitte (a major plus is that Katharine Isabelle reprises her role as Ginger whereas she was missing in the second film save for a few scenes) are wandering around in the Canadian wilderness after being stranded in the early 1800's. For some reason it's a prequel that has nothing to do with the story that was developed in the first two films, so what's the point besides some cheap werewolf scares? When they come across a wrecked Indian camp that depicts carnage and brutal murder, they hastily make way to find shelter. That's when they find a strange fort in the middle of nowhere that some soldiers reside in, and that's where the nightmare begins. At night, a pack of vicious werewolves continually attacks the fort outside the thick log walls, and by day things take a nasty turn for Ginger when she is bitten... again. It's all apparently a foreshadowing of the events in the first film but none of it is needed. There's no tension or intrigue where there was in the first and second, plus any trace of black humor that made the first film so ingenious is not apparent anywhere. The editing and cinematography seem rushed and at times I found the film almost incoherent. A huge disappointment that further ruins the integrity of the first. They should leave Ginger and Brigitte alone now.

    More like this

    Ginger Snaps : Résurrection
    6.4
    Ginger Snaps : Résurrection
    Ginger Snaps
    6.8
    Ginger Snaps
    Ginger Snaps 2: Unleashed - Deleted Scenes
    7.0
    Ginger Snaps 2: Unleashed - Deleted Scenes
    Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning - Deleted Scenes
    6.4
    Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning - Deleted Scenes
    Ginger Snaps: Blood, Teeth and Fur
    7.6
    Ginger Snaps: Blood, Teeth and Fur
    Cursed
    5.1
    Cursed
    American Mary
    6.2
    American Mary
    May
    6.6
    May
    Late Phases
    6.0
    Late Phases
    Blood: A Butcher's Tale
    6.9
    Blood: A Butcher's Tale
    Le loup-garou de Paris
    5.1
    Le loup-garou de Paris
    Ginger Snaps
    8.0
    Ginger Snaps

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Trivia
      Shot back-to-back with Ginger Snaps : Résurrection (2004).
    • Goofs
      The movie states it takes place in 1815. All of the rifles/muskets used in the movie are percussion locks, not flintlocks. The percussion cap was invented in the early 1820's. Percussion style rifles did not start becoming prevalent until the 1840's. In fact many of the "Northwest trading companies" produced flintlock trade guns well into the late 1880's.
    • Quotes

      Ginger: Come closer... it's a secret.

      [smiles through canine teeth]

      Ginger: [whispers] they're coming.

    • Crazy credits
      Near the end of the credits, it says "No animals or werewolves were harmed badly during the production of this film."
    • Alternate versions
      The DVD release contains deleted scenes. The additional footage is as follows:
      • While looking for a set of keys, Finn tells the girls that he is a map maker. The girls ask what has happened at the fort. Finn doesn't answer them. They see a pile of werewolf drawings on a desk, and look at Finn questioningly. He says that the pictures are of old wives tales.
      • An extended dinner scene with additional dialogue amongst the men. Seamus says that the scripture has made Gilbert twisted. James loudly questions Hunter's motives for staying at the fort. Seamus defends Hunter. Hunter puts a knife to James' throat before letting him go. Rowlands begins to make a speech before being interrupted by the howling of werewolves outside.
      • Returning to the fort after helping Ginger escape, Brigitte is brought before Rowlands. Gilbert claims she is a disciple of the devil and will steal the souls of the men. Rowlands tells Brigitte that when he looked into his son's eyes before shooting him, he saw nothing. He then says that when he looks into Brigitte's eyes, he sees only her sister. He tells the men they can do what they want with Brigitte, and that he washes his hands of the whole thing.
      • An extended burial scene where Gilbert makes several veiled attacks towards Seamus' personal life.
    • Connections
      Edited into Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning - Deleted Scenes (2004)

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    FAQ28

    • How long is Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning?Powered by Alexa
    • What kind of natives are featured in the film?
    • What is 'Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning' about?
    • Is "Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning" based on a book?

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • August 27, 2004 (Canada)
    • Country of origin
      • Canada
    • Languages
      • English
      • Cree
    • Also known as
      • Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning
    • Filming locations
      • Fort Edmonton Park - Fox Drive and Whitemud Drive, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    • Production companies
      • 49 Films
      • Combustion
      • Lions Gate Films
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Box office

    Edit
    • Budget
      • CA$3,500,000 (estimated)
    See detailed box office info on IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      • 1h 34m(94 min)
    • Color
      • Color
    • Sound mix
      • Dolby Digital
      • DTS
    • Aspect ratio
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.