Les Rivières pourpres 2 : Les Anges de l'apocalypse
Original title: Les rivières pourpres II - Les anges de l'apocalypse
IMDb RATING
5.9/10
22K
YOUR RATING
Pierre Niemans faces the threat of the apocalypse while investigating a series of ritual murders.Pierre Niemans faces the threat of the apocalypse while investigating a series of ritual murders.Pierre Niemans faces the threat of the apocalypse while investigating a series of ritual murders.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Nikita Lespinasse
- Mathilde - l'Infirmière
- (as Nikita)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
The original novel was awesome,and so was Mathieu Kassovitz's movie adaptation,starring Jean Reno and Vincent Cassel.Pity the same can't be said for this disappointing,insipid,useless sequel.
Reno returns as Pierre Niemans,having to investigate on a couple of murders perpetrated by superhuman monks.Yes,the concept IS that bad,and yes,the writer IS Luc Besson,who probably should retire considering his most recent works.Instead of Vincent Cassel and Nadia Fares,we get Benoit Magimel and Camille Natta,whose on screen presence is as interesting as that of an insect.
The main title sequence and the opening murders are visually great,but the rest of the film sucks.Reno and Magimel try to compensate the whole thing with some bad jokes,but when even Christopher Lee's portrayal of the Nazi villain seems to be saying "This time they should have typecast someone else",you realize something has gone incredibly wrong.
One of the worst follow-ups ever,and let's hope the third chapter stays in development hell forever.
Reno returns as Pierre Niemans,having to investigate on a couple of murders perpetrated by superhuman monks.Yes,the concept IS that bad,and yes,the writer IS Luc Besson,who probably should retire considering his most recent works.Instead of Vincent Cassel and Nadia Fares,we get Benoit Magimel and Camille Natta,whose on screen presence is as interesting as that of an insect.
The main title sequence and the opening murders are visually great,but the rest of the film sucks.Reno and Magimel try to compensate the whole thing with some bad jokes,but when even Christopher Lee's portrayal of the Nazi villain seems to be saying "This time they should have typecast someone else",you realize something has gone incredibly wrong.
One of the worst follow-ups ever,and let's hope the third chapter stays in development hell forever.
Rivières Pourpres 1 was better than 2 because in the first there were much more suspense elements. Here we come quick to the action and so surprises were limited in this average story. It's no doubt a fast paced mystery thriller with lots of special and sound effects. There is a scene that is better than Spiderman. The soundtrack is very strong. The setting places of the monastery or the Ligne Maginot were nice shot. Jean Reno made a solid job in his part as the cop Niemans and cool role of the horror legend Christopher Lee. Don't expect a top thriller but if you want to spend an entertaining evening this one works. Fortunately it's not too long. Will they decide to make part 3? I have some doubts. For these reasons our vote is 6/10.
In Lorraine, close to the border of Germany, the Chief Inspector Pierre Niemans (Jean Reno) is investigating the death of a man behind of a wall of an isolated abbey. Meanwhile, the efficient detective Reda (Benoît Magimel) is investigating the attempt of murder of a man called Jesus. They come to the same point along their investigations, join forces with the detective Marie (Camille Natta), a specialist in religious matter, and fight against Heinrich von Garten (Chritopher Lee), a German Minister of Culture and Religion, and a group of powerful monks.
What a mess is this "Les Rivières Pourpres II - Les Anges de l'Apocalypse"! Using the same character of Niemans from the good "Rivières Pourpres", this movie has some good moments, such as the dark atmosphere and Reda pursuing a monk through roofs, houses, sheds and streets. But the plot is totally confused and quite silly, wasting what could be a good movie. I expected much more, and in the end I was completely disappointed with this movie. My vote is six.
Title (Brazil): "Rio Vermelhos 2 Anjos do Apocalipse" ("Red Rivers 2 Apocalypse Angels")
What a mess is this "Les Rivières Pourpres II - Les Anges de l'Apocalypse"! Using the same character of Niemans from the good "Rivières Pourpres", this movie has some good moments, such as the dark atmosphere and Reda pursuing a monk through roofs, houses, sheds and streets. But the plot is totally confused and quite silly, wasting what could be a good movie. I expected much more, and in the end I was completely disappointed with this movie. My vote is six.
Title (Brazil): "Rio Vermelhos 2 Anjos do Apocalipse" ("Red Rivers 2 Apocalypse Angels")
Jean Reno's detective Niemans is back hunting the mind behind a bizarre series of murders and disappearances, all with a religious overtone. It all begins with a bleeding wall in a monastery and goes from there as twists seem to be leading us toward the end of the world.
I would like to report that this is at least the equal of the earlier film (One of the best thrillers of the past five or six years), but I can't. This is a film that has too many characters and too much plot with the result that you're hard pressed to work out whats happening. Characters such as Mary, a religious expert, or Christopher Lee's ominous business man are never more than cyphers. We get to know nothing about them. There are plot twists or points that are never fully explained. Watching this I had the sense that this was suppose to be about an hour longer but that it had been chopped up to its shortest possible running time. I'm led to believe this by the fact that whats on screen alludes to more than we're seeing, this is a film thats alive off the screen. I wish that they had taken the time to explain more.
None of it is really bad, although the acrobatics of the killer(s) in monks robes are much too far over the top for the films own good.
In the end as a rental or on cable this is okay, but but given a choice I'd watch the first one again over this.
Should Luc Besson read this: Please do another-and better- film with Reno's character. He's too good a creation to die after only two outings.
I would like to report that this is at least the equal of the earlier film (One of the best thrillers of the past five or six years), but I can't. This is a film that has too many characters and too much plot with the result that you're hard pressed to work out whats happening. Characters such as Mary, a religious expert, or Christopher Lee's ominous business man are never more than cyphers. We get to know nothing about them. There are plot twists or points that are never fully explained. Watching this I had the sense that this was suppose to be about an hour longer but that it had been chopped up to its shortest possible running time. I'm led to believe this by the fact that whats on screen alludes to more than we're seeing, this is a film thats alive off the screen. I wish that they had taken the time to explain more.
None of it is really bad, although the acrobatics of the killer(s) in monks robes are much too far over the top for the films own good.
In the end as a rental or on cable this is okay, but but given a choice I'd watch the first one again over this.
Should Luc Besson read this: Please do another-and better- film with Reno's character. He's too good a creation to die after only two outings.
...like in the first part. Only the location is different. Like the basic "Les rivieres pourpres", unconvincing story, too much in different forms. As virtues - presence of Magimel and Christopher Lee. As weak part- the less performances, the not the most inspired explanations and plot. The unrealism in too huge doses. And the childish simplicity of details. Not the worst movie, but one who you see only for the effort of actors to save a bad script.
Did you know
- TriviaSir Christopher Lee accepted his role mainly because he wanted to work with Jean Reno.
- GoofsThe shadow of boom mic is visible just after the army go to the monastery, at the bottom left corner, in the forest.
- Quotes
Reda: You still never told me.
Commissaire Niemans: What?
Reda: The name of your dog.
Commissaire Niemans: I found an interesting name, a dangerous dog's name.
Reda: For a Yorkshire?
Commissaire Niemans: Yes, I called him... Reda!
- ConnectionsFollows Les Rivières pourpres (2000)
- SoundtracksI Wanna Be Your Dog
Performed by The Stooges
- How long is Crimson Rivers 2: Angels of the Apocalypse?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official sites
- Languages
- Also known as
- Les Anges de l'apocalypse
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- €30,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross US & Canada
- $152,148
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $46,376
- Sep 6, 2004
- Gross worldwide
- $40,152,148
- Runtime
- 1h 37m(97 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content