Can you trust your partner to fairly divide his share of the pot? That's what this Game Show Network entry attempted to determine, as teams of two competed to answer questions and divide the... Read allCan you trust your partner to fairly divide his share of the pot? That's what this Game Show Network entry attempted to determine, as teams of two competed to answer questions and divide their bank.Can you trust your partner to fairly divide his share of the pot? That's what this Game Show Network entry attempted to determine, as teams of two competed to answer questions and divide their bank.
Browse episodes
Photos
Featured reviews
It's not that good either. It doesn't hurt to watch it really. But it's nothing great. It passes for okay viewing. I can watch this show but I don't go out my way to see it. It's something I'd watch if there's nothing else on.
I noticed there is a way to tell who is going "foe." Oh yes, it's right in the contestant's eyes. They say. "I am trying to take all the money, ha ha!" rather easily. There are some contestants who do have good poker faces, but overall, these contestants should learn to better read their teammates' faces. Then the final decision wouldn't be so much of a shock.
It's rare when both members of a team vote "friend" though. Too many greedy people out there. I have seen it happen, but not that often at all.
I noticed there is a way to tell who is going "foe." Oh yes, it's right in the contestant's eyes. They say. "I am trying to take all the money, ha ha!" rather easily. There are some contestants who do have good poker faces, but overall, these contestants should learn to better read their teammates' faces. Then the final decision wouldn't be so much of a shock.
It's rare when both members of a team vote "friend" though. Too many greedy people out there. I have seen it happen, but not that often at all.
This game show starts with the host literally SHRIEKING terrible jokes at us which were obviously written and given to her before the show. Stuff that doesn't even make sense, like the one I just watched as a refresher on YouTube has her say "Michelle likes putting her foot down on the gas pedal and push old ladies into the brick wall!" What the hell does that even mean?
Yet somehow the show manages to get even worse. The trivia questions are the easiest ever, and on top of that it is multiple choice. "What bar does Homer Simpson like to go to? A) Moe's, B) Jobo's, C) Shabadabadoo's or D) Pigglefartdinklebee's?" The thing is, the contestants somehow manage to get a lot of these wrong, and the producers don't care anyway because even if they get everything right and rack up points and dollars, they're not going home with any money anyway, because...
The final round of this show makes the entire process pointless! Just like the also awful UK game show "Shafted" from 2001, which Friend or Foe either bought the format from or just completely and shamelessly stole, the two final contestants at the end of the show decide to A) Share/Friend or B) Shaft/Foe each other. If they both choose to share, they share. If they both choose to shaft, they get nothing. If they choose shaft and share, the shafter wins all the money. So it's not hard to see what ends up happening almost every time: they both decide to keep the money. Once in a while someone would take a chance on the other person also sharing, and in those few cases the other person would of course shaft them and keep all the money. Maybe one or two times (literally, as another reviewer said, you could count the times on one hand even if you're missing a few fingers) they would actually both decide to share.
So it's a very negative and sad show where 90% of the time both people would screw each other over and get nothing, and 9% of the time one person (a jerk) would screw over the nice person who was willing to share with them, and 1% of the time you somehow get two people actually willing to share and everyone (including the audience) wins!
This show is garbage, the host is terrible, all the jokes they gave her were terrible, and it never should have been made.
Yet somehow the show manages to get even worse. The trivia questions are the easiest ever, and on top of that it is multiple choice. "What bar does Homer Simpson like to go to? A) Moe's, B) Jobo's, C) Shabadabadoo's or D) Pigglefartdinklebee's?" The thing is, the contestants somehow manage to get a lot of these wrong, and the producers don't care anyway because even if they get everything right and rack up points and dollars, they're not going home with any money anyway, because...
The final round of this show makes the entire process pointless! Just like the also awful UK game show "Shafted" from 2001, which Friend or Foe either bought the format from or just completely and shamelessly stole, the two final contestants at the end of the show decide to A) Share/Friend or B) Shaft/Foe each other. If they both choose to share, they share. If they both choose to shaft, they get nothing. If they choose shaft and share, the shafter wins all the money. So it's not hard to see what ends up happening almost every time: they both decide to keep the money. Once in a while someone would take a chance on the other person also sharing, and in those few cases the other person would of course shaft them and keep all the money. Maybe one or two times (literally, as another reviewer said, you could count the times on one hand even if you're missing a few fingers) they would actually both decide to share.
So it's a very negative and sad show where 90% of the time both people would screw each other over and get nothing, and 9% of the time one person (a jerk) would screw over the nice person who was willing to share with them, and 1% of the time you somehow get two people actually willing to share and everyone (including the audience) wins!
This show is garbage, the host is terrible, all the jokes they gave her were terrible, and it never should have been made.
First of all. Nearly every contestant is pretty much a half step from being a prison inmate. The show actually seeks out and finds people that are unethical or criminal in nature. One of the contests was introduced as a guy that stole his mother's car. Another won $2,000 by stealing raffle tickets. I only wish I was joking about this. There is no one that you wish to win, you hope they all lose. They are all some of the biggest lowlifes in the country.
As if this weren't bad enough, they get yet another chance to prove what lowlifes they are at the "Trust Box". The money that each team wins is somewhat up for grabs. Each member of a team stands on the side of the trust box to play a sort of twisted rock, paper, scissors type game. Each of the two people from the team chooses either "Friend" or "Foe". Here's how this works...
If they both think they trust each other they would both choose "Friend". They would then split the team money and each of them would take half home.
If neither thinks they can trust the other they would both choose "Foe". When this happens, they both screw each other and no one gets anything.
Now comes the worst. If they both appear to trust each other and one of them chooses "Friend" and the other chooses "Foe" then the person who voted "Friend" gets nothing. Nada, zilch, zippo. The person who voted "Foe" goes home with the entire wad of cash.
Sound bad? It's a lot worse watching it.
Trust me there's no redeeming quality to this piece of crap excuse for a show. Avoid it at all costs.
As if this weren't bad enough, they get yet another chance to prove what lowlifes they are at the "Trust Box". The money that each team wins is somewhat up for grabs. Each member of a team stands on the side of the trust box to play a sort of twisted rock, paper, scissors type game. Each of the two people from the team chooses either "Friend" or "Foe". Here's how this works...
If they both think they trust each other they would both choose "Friend". They would then split the team money and each of them would take half home.
If neither thinks they can trust the other they would both choose "Foe". When this happens, they both screw each other and no one gets anything.
Now comes the worst. If they both appear to trust each other and one of them chooses "Friend" and the other chooses "Foe" then the person who voted "Friend" gets nothing. Nada, zilch, zippo. The person who voted "Foe" goes home with the entire wad of cash.
Sound bad? It's a lot worse watching it.
Trust me there's no redeeming quality to this piece of crap excuse for a show. Avoid it at all costs.
Personal Secrets Placed on the airwaves for the entire world (poeentially ) to hear? to turn the unforgiving masses against you? Speaking for myself, to coin an old cliche, "Some things are better left unsaid." Anybody who has ever been on this attrocious joke of a game show must want money pretty bad.
0* (not worth rating) out of a possible *****
0* (not worth rating) out of a possible *****
Very rarely does a game show offer you one epiphanous experience equivalent to the Divine Revelation of St. John, but the game show "Friend Or Foe" has the benefit of not one, but four dramatic insights into human nature. They are as follows:
1. When mankind works together in a spirit of harmony, the mutual reward produces not only material gain, but the feeling of trusting your fellow man.
2. That the world is made for the cunning, and in the wake of those who would deceive, the innocent are caught in their snares and left to languish with the dull-eyed feeling of their own stupidity to warm them. Soon, they return hardened with the lessons of life to make them wiser.
3. Ultimately mutual destruction will beset those who seek to destroy each other, leaving a void of broken dreams to punish those who would do harm to their brother for mutual betrayal leads only to a burden for the wicked.
But the fourth and most important revelation. No matter how much time Viacom (owner of Game Show Network) has to burn off on a back-dated contract from MTV that they acquired in the merger, the only people who will suffer a torment as of being subjugated to horrors of hell are those who have to watch Kennedy in what is the single worst game show of the last 10 years. That includes STUDS.
So the only question you have to ask, probably about twenty minutes into this train wreck, is the following: Would the seas running red with blood really be that bad right about now?
1. When mankind works together in a spirit of harmony, the mutual reward produces not only material gain, but the feeling of trusting your fellow man.
2. That the world is made for the cunning, and in the wake of those who would deceive, the innocent are caught in their snares and left to languish with the dull-eyed feeling of their own stupidity to warm them. Soon, they return hardened with the lessons of life to make them wiser.
3. Ultimately mutual destruction will beset those who seek to destroy each other, leaving a void of broken dreams to punish those who would do harm to their brother for mutual betrayal leads only to a burden for the wicked.
But the fourth and most important revelation. No matter how much time Viacom (owner of Game Show Network) has to burn off on a back-dated contract from MTV that they acquired in the merger, the only people who will suffer a torment as of being subjugated to horrors of hell are those who have to watch Kennedy in what is the single worst game show of the last 10 years. That includes STUDS.
So the only question you have to ask, probably about twenty minutes into this train wreck, is the following: Would the seas running red with blood really be that bad right about now?
Did you know
Details
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content