The rise and fall of the Enron company, as seen from the perspective of employee Brian Cruver, based on his book.The rise and fall of the Enron company, as seen from the perspective of employee Brian Cruver, based on his book.The rise and fall of the Enron company, as seen from the perspective of employee Brian Cruver, based on his book.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Liz Perry
- (as Nancy Sakovich)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
With Kenneth Lay dead mere months after being found guilty, the Natwest Three becoming a major political football in UK/US relations and one of the bankers found dead six days after going missing, my interest in the subject was peaked enough to look back on this film from a few years ago. The downside of my timing was that I had already seen the imperfect but vastly superior Smartest Guy in the Room. As a documentary, this other film focuses on developing the main story and presenting it as clearly as possible. It also benefits hugely from having access to the in-house video footage that this film can only dramatise. Conversely this film takes a dramatisation path that means by default it has to focus on the made-up character of Cruver and his story as much as on the story of Enron. To some viewers this will work but I suggest that these people have not seen Smartest Guys.
This film does a so-so job of explaining the story but it is happy to do it in massive jumps and simplifications that don't give you the time to let them sink in more than you need to keep Cruver's story moving forward. It delivers the impact of the story pretty basically as well having women crying about their lost money etc. The focus on Cruver doesn't really work because you can't shake the feeling (the knowledge) that his story is infinitely less interesting than the wider story of the corporation and its impact on business. It is made weaker by the TVM style delivery which works "best" overdoing the soapy emotion of the tale but cannot cope with the complex case and the wider ramifications. The direction is so-so and the budget limited although in fairness Smartest Guys used the real offices and real footage, so this can't compare.
The cast are roundly weak, which isn't that much of a surprise. Kane is bland and never convinces no matter what his character is going through. Sure his material isn't that good but his performance is no better. Elizabeth is a "big name" in this film and to the vast majority of us alarm bells will be ringing she has little to do either way. Dennehy turns in with a poor character that is used to explain things in the place of a decent script and his lack of interest is writ large across his performance. The rest of the cast are so-so at best but few convince and Farrell and Wynne are particularly weak.
Overall this is an entry-level film if you are looking to learn more about power, corporations much better is Smartest Guys. In the absence of that film this might be worth a look but it is hard to get a lot of value from this very soapy approach. Works as daytime fodder but the truth deserves much, much more than this.
I knew someone who worked at Enron. She started out as a secretary but was very happy to have worked her way into the banking and investment side of the company. That was about a year before the company collapsed and I'd lost touch with her, but I've often wondered how she ended up. If she landed on her feet. I never knew her well, don't have her contact info.
There are probably a thousand stories about individual employees at Enron and how this changed things for them. It's hard to feel sorry for the individuals, when the investors were the real victims, but employees have stories too.
This made for TV movie, which I saw when it came out, was barely adequate. I made it through, but I didn't find it impressive. The Smartest Men in the Room is a far better and much more complete story about Enron.
This is from the point of view of one and his experience in the company. I am sure there was much more to his story that could not be fit into the time frome of the length of a movie.
"Anatomy of Greed" (2002) You may want to check it out!
I went into thinking I wasn't going to like it. I wasn't interested in what happened at Enron, but I am a #Kaniac= fan of Christian Kane, so I gave it watch!!
I enjoyed it more than expected! Love Brian Dennehy as well!.
This movie may be a little slow going for people of today (2024) So folks need to take that into consideration when viewing, that it was made in 2003 and the story is based around one man!
Christian Kane as always rocked his role! I highly recommend it!
Did you know
- TriviaThe real Brian Cruver, whose book inspired the movie, said the movie was very accurate to his experiences working at Enron, with two exceptions: he felt the movie overemphasized the hiring of former strippers as secretaries and assistants, and that the Enron company party showed in the film was very tame compared to the actual company's rallies.
- Quotes
Brian Cruver: [Narrating the epilogue] Others at Enron responded more... openly to the call for disclosure. Dream became reality when Playboy presented "The Women of Enron," and then, Playgirl responded with "The Men of Enron." Bickers? Well, he left Wall Street and found something a little more...
[Pictures are shown of Bickers as a blackjack dealer in Las Vegas]
Brian Cruver: secure. Duffy returned his family to San Francisco. Liz found another marketing job.
[Pictures of Liz having her Enron "E" tattoo removed from her breast]
Brian Cruver: And she managed to put the E behind her. Anne-Marie's expecting to start college full-time.
[Pictures of Anne-Marie working as a waitress]
Brian Cruver: . In a year or two. Out of all of our team, McLainey lost the most, but we have no doubt he will land on his feet. Even Lazarri survived. Sort of.
Lazarri: [Cuts to Lazarri at his new job] But, you know what? I know I'm gonna love it here at WorldCom!
Details
- Runtime
- 1h 40m(100 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.33 : 1