Open Range

Open Range is without doubt one of the best family movies I have seen for a long time. Although not quite as good as "Dances With Wolves" Open Range, funnily enough, not only stars Kevin Costner but is along the same theme in as much as it tells a story about the early American way of life. This time about the "Free Range" cattlemen and the different hardships they had to cope with. And for once my family could sit down and watch a movie without all the smut, swearing and extreme violence that unfortunately, all movie makers of late, seem to think is necessary to sell them. The storyline was simple and easy to follow at the same time as it retold a fine piece of early American history.

Although the actors had a simple storyline to work with, I felt their performances made the movie all the more realistic. Kevin Costner in my opinion is a fine actor, but put him in with an under-rated master such as Robert Duvall, and you can't go wrong. Their easy going,straight from the hip portrayal of the main characters was one of the reasons that as soon as I had finished watching the video I rewound it and the whole family watched it again.

Boss, Charley, Mose and Button are free rangers crossing America with their herd. When Mose gets beaten up and imprisoned by a Marshall in the employee of cruel rancher Baxter, Boss and Charley ride into town and help him back to the camp. However Baxter sends him men to scatter their herd - during which they kill Mose. With Button seriously injured, Boss and Charley ride into town to get justice.

It is perhaps a good thing that the unjustified criticism and media-driven-hatred of Kevin Costner is starting to subside, but we must be careful not to be too forgiving of him and too quick to heap praise on him. Open Range was greeted with rave reviews and hyped claims that it doesn't totally live up to - but it still manages to be an enjoyable and well made film. The film opens very weakly with an overly-wholesome feel and `aw-shucks' dialogue that continues for the first ten minutes. However after this the film gets better and settles down into more of an acceptable tone. The film is never really very dark, but it has a nice tension to it that runs even when the film is amusing.

If it has one major flaw it is that it is too slow to really be enjoyed by all. Even as someone used to the slow pace of many westerns, I found this to really try my patience at times. It is not so much the pace of the film as the feeling of it dragging. The actual pace works quite well for this film but it should have been edited a bit tighter to offset the drag - there are plenty of moments where it could have been trimmed to it's benefit, and the film could easily have lost 15 minutes. The slow pace helps in one regard - the final gunfight. When the standoff finally comes it is violent, long and very impacting. Some reviewers have complained about the lack of realism in the fight, but I actually think that the misses (although excessive) are more believable than scores of direct hits. The gunfight is all the more surprising for Charley's sudden return to character. His dark past is hinted at, but when it comes it comes with a thunder - the sound effects are tremendous, the first shot made me jump and the rest were just as loud.

Some issues are smudged: it is too hard to believe that Sue would be unmarried, Charley's descent is not that well done and both Mose and Buttons are poor characters - but it is easy to ignore these. The characters are not great but they are good enough for this. Duvall is the best thing in the film, his easy charm compliments the slow pace and he makes for nice slow-poke humour. Costner is as good, he is unassuming - not a great character but good enough for a western. Bening is good despite being given the romantic subplot to handle. Support is good from Gambon, the late Jeter and others in solid, if stereotypical roles. On a personal note it was good to see Kim Coates in a big screen movie.

Overall, this got big praise, but it will likely not covert anyone to be a western fan. As a genre film it is very enjoyable but it is hard to ignore the clichéd slow-motion, the overly slow pace and the indiscipline of the editing. However the film is enjoyable, funny, patient and, when it comes, brutally impacting.

They don't westerns that much anymore, at least on the big screen. People in the Baby Boomer generation grew up with them on television. Western films were big at the box office in several decades, too.

Well, at least Kevin Costner must have a heart for the genre as he been involved with several major western productions in the last 15 years, this the latest.

The best thing I can say about this film right out front is that it may be the best western I've ever watched. I can't give it higher praise than that! Since I've seen so many, for so long, it's especially high praise.

I make this bold statement because of the following:

1 - Fantastic scenery and beautiful cinematography. If it looks spectacular on my 24-inch flat-screen, I can't imagine how awesome it would be a big plasma set.

2 - Characters you really care about, led by three actors who almost always give solid performances: Robert Duvall (the best in here), Costner and Annette Bening. Duvall, by the way, gives one of the best short "speeches" I've ever witnessed in a movie. It was nice to see Bening actually play a wholesome woman for a change. The two men who are out on the range with Duvall and Costner also were excellent.

3 - Just the right amount of action. When the action does occur, such as gunfire, the sound is incredible. This might be one of the best movies, audibly-speaking, I've ever heard, which is another reason for ranking it Number One. There are no lulls but not a ton of action, either.

4 - Just the right amount of romance. It doesn't get sappy, it doesn't overshadow the basic story, but it adds a nice, soft touch to what could be a very rough and unpleasant tale. And, in a different twist, it's the romance, not the usual climactic gun battle, that ends this film.

I can't say enough about this movie except that I'm sorry more westerns like it aren't made today.

When this film reaches the climactic shootout, it is a real cinematic treat. Costner has a great feel for creating and choreographing complex action scenes. There is one wide shot in particular that contains many actors involved in a number of separate interactions carried out in a masterfully-planned sequence. It is worth watching several times and paying close attention to each individual shootout going on within the larger scene. Costner has mastered the art of filling the screen with complex action.

The cast is outstanding and the love story is compelling and not typical Hollywood. As a real Western fan, I enjoyed this one enough to watch it several times. I think the plot offers something for everyone and I think it is one of those rare films that appeals to both men and women. It is certainly worth checking out.

Personally, I didn't find it long. I've seen many great Westerns--such films as "Will Penny," "Shane," "The Unforgiven," and several other Eastwood movies spring to mind--and this was right up there with them. My thanks to Kevin Costner, Robert Duvall (of course), and Annette Bening for giving me a wonderful experience at the movies. It doesn't happen all that often anymore. To those who say, "They don't make 'em like they used to," my response is "This one's better."