Townsfolk discover a warped secret while clearing out the house of a recently deceased, aristocratic spinster.Townsfolk discover a warped secret while clearing out the house of a recently deceased, aristocratic spinster.Townsfolk discover a warped secret while clearing out the house of a recently deceased, aristocratic spinster.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Awards
- 1 win & 1 nomination total
James Murtaugh
- Pharmacist
- (as Jim Murtaugh)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
This movie was wonderfully done. I'm not surprised it went from writings to a play to a movie. I haven't seen it as a play yet, but from an actors point of view this would be either completely different on a stage, or it's meant for film. It had a lot of recognizable actors which was a pleasant surprise. Angelica Houston was elegant yet creepy at the same time. This was her ultimate prequel performance to the Adam's Family Movies. And of course, William Faulkner gives this story a Gothic, and dark feeling that is ahead of its time. I'm writing a final on it for my Civil War in Memory class. It's a must see for all future horror film makers!!
The pasing time is the main character of this short film, adaptation of the text of Wiliam Faulkner. Dificult to write to much , except to apreciate the beautiful performance of Anjelica Huston , the atmosphere fair crafted and the similarity with near reality aspects , the people prefering to live alone, in their own world , the isolation and the smal tades of a servant , the revelation after the death of owner, presumed explanation of her behavior and, sure, the curiosity about what sems more than.ecentric, the bad air around house, the stealed stuffs imediately after death of owner.
So, the pasing time and an answer about it.
So, the pasing time and an answer about it.
This is one of those worthy American TV half hours based on a serious short story by a major writer, in this case William Faulkner. The story is about an odd spinster in a small town in Alabama in the 1890s, and her strange tale. It is the first directorial effort of Lyndon Chubbuck, who did very well at it. The story is enough to sustain 27 minutes with the well-scripted narration of John Houseman to carry it through its exposition, and Houseman delivers this in his usual confiding but magisterial style, as if he were an old judge telling us of a case he had once presided over. I am not a William Faulkner fan, but never mind, this is an interesting film and I preferred the fact that it was short, so that I was not subjected to Faulkner's gloom for too long. The story, as one might expect, has a grisly aspect, but to avoid revealing too much, I draw back my breath and say no more about that. What is most striking about this film and makes it work is the excellent central performance of Anjelica Huston as Emily. She has to pull this off with minimal dialogue, as an exercise in sheer 'presence projection'. Despite this being a very early effort of hers, it is entirely successful, and she already seems an old pro, despite being young at the time. This is certainly an early performance to be proud of, and she need have no fear of being embarrassed by juvenilia in this case. It is a very fine film, and the sort of thing of which more should be done. All those who band together to bring classics to the screen on American TV are heroic figures deserving of our thanks. If only this kind of thing could happen more often, but alas, the unstoppable Rise of Decadence will make films like this seem in retrospect like the last flickerings of culture before the candle went out.
I didn't know anything about William Faulkner's short story when I began watching "A Rose for Emily." Angelica Huston, John Randolph, and John Carradine, with a few more Hustons involved, seemed like a good bet. But while I watched it, I had more questions than answers. I had a feeling a bit more info would keep it from feeling so flat to me.
Sure enough, Faulkner's short story has many more details that might have helped flesh it out. I think I would have enjoyed a slightly longer version with more of the written story included. This short film seems more about creating an atmosphere than plot.
Sure enough, Faulkner's short story has many more details that might have helped flesh it out. I think I would have enjoyed a slightly longer version with more of the written story included. This short film seems more about creating an atmosphere than plot.
I wish this mpovie was more avialable for others who enjoy a movie with a twist. This is a short film but follows the story (A rose for emily by william faulkner) quite well. Truelly a cult classic...get it if you can. Good spookey twisted movie! 10 out 10 stars
Did you know
- TriviaIn the original short story, it's clarified that Homer Barton was actually a homosexual. The film makes no mention of that, simply repeating his character's original line that he's not "the marrying type."
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Роза для Эмили
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content