[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
IMDbPro

The Gospel According to Philip K. Dick

  • 2001
  • Not Rated
  • 1h 20m
IMDb RATING
4.6/10
294
YOUR RATING
The Gospel According to Philip K. Dick (2001)
Documentary

Philip K. Dick stories continue to inspire filmmakers, writers, technophiles and philosophers. And for the last ten years of his life, he inhabited a stranger reality than the fiction he cre... Read allPhilip K. Dick stories continue to inspire filmmakers, writers, technophiles and philosophers. And for the last ten years of his life, he inhabited a stranger reality than the fiction he created.Philip K. Dick stories continue to inspire filmmakers, writers, technophiles and philosophers. And for the last ten years of his life, he inhabited a stranger reality than the fiction he created.

  • Director
    • Mark Steensland
  • Stars
    • Paul Williams
    • Robert Anton Wilson
    • Scott Apel
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    4.6/10
    294
    YOUR RATING
    • Director
      • Mark Steensland
    • Stars
      • Paul Williams
      • Robert Anton Wilson
      • Scott Apel
    • 19User reviews
    • 8Critic reviews
    • 27Metascore
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • Photos1

    View Poster

    Top cast9

    Edit
    Paul Williams
    Paul Williams
    Robert Anton Wilson
    Robert Anton Wilson
    Scott Apel
    Scott Apel
    Jay Kinney
    Jay Kinney
    Ray Nelson
    Ray Nelson
    Miriam Lloyd
    Miriam Lloyd
    Jason Koornick
    Jason Koornick
    Duncan Watson
    Sharon Perry
    • Director
      • Mark Steensland
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews19

    4.6294
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    6denmn

    interesting subject...inept film-making

    After watching this "film" i was moved to seek out the fiction of

    Phillip K. Dick.

    So that's a good thing....Dick comes of as an interesting writer

    worthy of further study.

    The filmmakers, however, have assembled the material within in

    such a fey, self-satisfied and fanboy-esque ineptitude that i found

    myself, after a time, staring out the window and listening, rather

    than watching the amateurishly-assembled and shot interview

    footage or (especially) the amazingly ill-conceived "animated"

    scene breaks. The people responsible for this have no idea of

    film-making or pacing; had they no idea of how the silly, repetitive

    "animated" scene breaks would grind everything to a halt? Jesus.

    If you want to learn more about Dick, fine...you can get some idea

    from the material within. But, as film-making, this is an amateurish

    embarrassment.
    5dbborroughs

    Fans Only Need Watch Or If You Don't Know Dick Now, You Still Won't

    Rambling chatter about Philip K Dick, best known for the novels that became Minority Report, Blade Runner and Screamers. The chatter is loosely grouped together by subject but it drifts back and forth through many subjects. Its interesting to listen to but a bit tough to watch.

    The trouble is that this is nothing more than interviews with people who knew Dick talking, inter-cut with some audio interview footage spiced up with cartoon of Dick at the typewriter. There is almost nothing other than the interviews themselves, no photos, some fleeting shots of printed material and of the outside of Dick's house. There is no narration, no attempt to explain any of the works he wrote or of his life, its simply remembrances that will mean nothing to anyone who has never read any of his books or, more importantly, never heard any of the stories of the man. My Dad who watched this with me was totally bewildered because he didn't know about Dick's life.

    If you want an introduction to Philip K Dick and his work go somewhere else, this will put you off him forever. If you already know the man you may want to rent this, and then do something else while listening to it since its a dull thing to watch, but an interesting thing to listen to since the stories told are quite funny assuming you have some context to understand the craziness of them.
    auteurus

    Disappointing fan documentary

    It's possible for a low budget fan documentary to be good, even interesting. Ed Wood and Jack Nance fans have made low budget documentaries about their respective topics which, although flawed, still held my interest.

    The Gospel According to Philip K. Dick however, is not such a documentary as it fails on almost every level. There is no archival material of Dick and little biographical info. The director appears more obsessed with Dick's visions and drug use rather than his incredible talent.

    The only appearance of Dick himself is muffled audio over a typewriter animation. The annoying animation is repeated ad nauseum, quickly becomes very grating and had me reaching for the fast forward on the remote. Even a still photo of Dick with the voiceover would have been better than this pathetic attempt.

    The production quality is poor, with shaky camera work, bad sound and music that ranges from jarringly bad techno to lame piano. The interviews are the highlight of the film, but even they are repetitive and many border on pointless (e.g. the librarian giving a tour of the Phillip K Dick collection, which is basically a tour of a bookshelf). Would it have killed the film makers to identify who they are actually interviewing, and what their relationship to Dick was?

    Even hardcore Phillip K Dick fans would gain little from watching this. Most people would be hard pressed to watch it at all. The most disappointing aspect is that Dick is one of the seminal writers of his generation, and his legacy deserves much better than this weak effort.

    2/10
    2funkyfry

    Disappointing documentary for fans

    Poor documentary of this sci-fi great explores houses he used to live in here in the bay area (with the webmasters of PKD websites as guides) and other irrelevant details while failing to really explore what makes his writing unique. But then, if I wanted to know that, I guess I'd pick up one of his books (which I often like to do). This film is for people who are not Philip K. Dick fans, but might have seen "Total Recall" or "Blade Runner" or "Minority Report" (the worst one yet.... or wasn't there something with Gary Senise or whatever his name is? Hopefully that got shelved) and they want to know what this guy's about, but they don't know how to read. For those people and no one else, this film is recommended.

    Not recommended for fans of PKD: you won't find out anything you don't already know.

    p.s. just reading through my comments from years ago here in 2008 and wanted to point out that I did actually see "Imposter" with Gary Sinise and it was one of the more decent Philip Dick movies relatively speaking. At least Sinise isn't some kind of superman or supermodel, he looks like a "dickian" hero.
    5gavin6942

    Interesting, But Bland

    I want to make my review a riff on another review, written by Kurt Winter of New Jersey. He starts off by saying, "If I weren't already a PKD fan ... this docuflick would do absolutely nothing for me." And that is the very heart of the problem here. If I did not know who Phil Dick was, I would not have learned it from this film. When was he born? When did he die? Where did he grow up? These things are never stated.

    Winter writes, "While it was certainly informative, it could have been edited better, and could have been more broad." I completely agree, especially with the editing. Sometimes the different voices blend together to tell a story, sometimes they seem poorly connected. And the segue from one spot to the next is weak.

    More charismatic people to interview, or at least an eloquent narrator, would have helped a great deal. Just showing clips from people who knew Dick does not really tell the story. These people should be used to support the story, not be the backbone. The younger guys with websites seem completely out of place and even if their words are true, they come off as amateur.

    But, hey, if you are a Dick fan and want to hear his friends -- including Robert Anton Wilson and the author of "They Live" -- this is worth checking out.

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Connections
      References Blade Runner (1982)

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • March 2, 2001 (United States)
    • Country of origin
      • United States
    • Official site
      • First Run Features / Eye In The Sky Entertainment
    • Language
      • English
    • Also known as
      • Il vangelo secondo Philip K. Dick
    • Production company
      • TKO Productions
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Box office

    Edit
    • Gross US & Canada
      • $582
    • Opening weekend US & Canada
      • $582
      • Mar 4, 2001
    See detailed box office info on IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      • 1h 20m(80 min)
    • Color
      • Color
    • Sound mix
      • Stereo

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.