The murder of the ex-wife of Dr. Sam Dennis Charney (Rutger Hauer) leads Detective Della Wilder (Pam Grier) to uncover a series of women's murders somehow linked to a big pharmaceutical comp... Read allThe murder of the ex-wife of Dr. Sam Dennis Charney (Rutger Hauer) leads Detective Della Wilder (Pam Grier) to uncover a series of women's murders somehow linked to a big pharmaceutical company.The murder of the ex-wife of Dr. Sam Dennis Charney (Rutger Hauer) leads Detective Della Wilder (Pam Grier) to uncover a series of women's murders somehow linked to a big pharmaceutical company.
Linda E. Smith
- Barbara Pieczkowa
- (as Linda Smith)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
I recently watched Wilder (2000) on Tubi. The story follows a string of murders that lead Detective Wilder to a doctor who becomes her prime suspect. She arrests and interrogates him, but instead of answering directly, he drops hints that suggest her investigation is only scratching the surface-and that a much larger conspiracy may be at play. Now, Wilder must determine whether the doctor is revealing the truth or just cleverly covering his tracks.
Directed by Rodney Gibbons (Silent Night), the film stars Pam Grier (Coffy), Rutger Hauer (Hobo with a Shotgun), Romano Orzari (Kin), and John Dunn-Hill (300).
This is one of those films you watch for the cast-and quickly regret it. The production quality and writing feel like a made-for-TV movie, with a plot that unfolds too conveniently. The dialogue is stiff, the performances lack authenticity, and Pam Grier's typically commanding presence feels forced. The romantic subplot falls flat, and the ending doesn't land with the charm or impact it seems to aim for.
In conclusion, Wilder is a lackluster crime drama with few redeeming qualities. I'd give it a 3/10 and recommend skipping it.
Directed by Rodney Gibbons (Silent Night), the film stars Pam Grier (Coffy), Rutger Hauer (Hobo with a Shotgun), Romano Orzari (Kin), and John Dunn-Hill (300).
This is one of those films you watch for the cast-and quickly regret it. The production quality and writing feel like a made-for-TV movie, with a plot that unfolds too conveniently. The dialogue is stiff, the performances lack authenticity, and Pam Grier's typically commanding presence feels forced. The romantic subplot falls flat, and the ending doesn't land with the charm or impact it seems to aim for.
In conclusion, Wilder is a lackluster crime drama with few redeeming qualities. I'd give it a 3/10 and recommend skipping it.
Really strange movie. Feels like a failed pilot and first two episodes of a television show that didn't get picked up and was repurposed into a film screenplay and cast with new actors. I've really never seen anything like it.
Strange editing choices (not entirely sure sometimes whether they were deliberate choices for style or the product of a rushed production or what); incomprehensible plot advances; dumbfounding choices made by the characters; if I had to place it in a genre I'd call it "TV Grindhouse" - a genre both created and killed in a single product.
Overall I would say this is worth watching just to try to parse it.
Strange editing choices (not entirely sure sometimes whether they were deliberate choices for style or the product of a rushed production or what); incomprehensible plot advances; dumbfounding choices made by the characters; if I had to place it in a genre I'd call it "TV Grindhouse" - a genre both created and killed in a single product.
Overall I would say this is worth watching just to try to parse it.
Watched it cos Hauer and Grier don't normally do rubbish. The plot could have been so good but yawningly dull.
This film is a loving nod to the films of the late 70's--in cuts, setting and music choices (note the rotary phone, the answering machines, the women's lib and PMS comments, and of course Pam Grier herself--who looks fantastic). Filmed in 2000, it does an excellent job in depicting many of the characteristics of the 70's, though some of the tech and procedurals are of the 80's in a kind of mash-up. The dialogue was a high point with some pretty funny lines: "The only chemistry between you and me is a DNA test..." ; or this: "Did he have any enemies? That depends on how many wives talk in their sleep." It works because it's done perfectly straight, no sly wink at the audience. Many of the complaints were not justified; some of the acting was downright good--especially the interplay between the main characters, and in particular Pam Grier who plays her role with her usual panache. Rutger Hauer is an unusually charming Rutger Hauer which was a nice change, and his acting was better in this movie than I've seen in many of his others--I really don't get the criticism in this regard. Several of the extras/character actors feel flat or come across as slightly off-kilter stereotypes, but given what the film was trying to do, that may have been deliberate. The plot is pretty standard but plays logically with some interesting and rather unexpected twists, and an interesting big-pharma take. Unlike many of these movies, it actually does pay attention to little details--like a uniform giving them a "look" while they're talking (loudly) about their case in the hallway. Admittedly, there are a few--uh, unrealistic moments, but they were original and unexpected (ANY man will have a visceral reaction to one particular murder scene) and fit with the tone of the film, so in that sense, are forgivable. So, take this movie for what it is, an affectionate nod to the past, and overall an unexpected, enjoyable non-cerebral piece of entertainment.
What bothers me in films like this is not the things that don't work in it. It's the thing that could have been done. It's not so much the visual lack of power and effectiveness of it, but the total mental poverty that surrounds it.
They picked up two mildly interesting actors, with credits on their hands and assigned them to this total mess, relying that the fact that they're in makes the whole think work on the financial side.
This is a total mess, a weak story, about some honest people fighting pharmaceutical interests, against all odds, the 'Fugitive' type. Pam Grier is assigned the extra role of being her past roles, associated with racial concerns and feminism. Both she and Hauer are cashing their checks. They could be doing better things.
Trying to get away with such a film is as much a deceit as it is the radioactive tests in the film.
My opinion: 1/5
http://www.7eyes.wordpress.com
They picked up two mildly interesting actors, with credits on their hands and assigned them to this total mess, relying that the fact that they're in makes the whole think work on the financial side.
This is a total mess, a weak story, about some honest people fighting pharmaceutical interests, against all odds, the 'Fugitive' type. Pam Grier is assigned the extra role of being her past roles, associated with racial concerns and feminism. Both she and Hauer are cashing their checks. They could be doing better things.
Trying to get away with such a film is as much a deceit as it is the radioactive tests in the film.
My opinion: 1/5
http://www.7eyes.wordpress.com
Details
- Runtime
- 1h 30m(90 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content