A fascinating story about a sleazy lawyer who stumbles upon enlightenment.A fascinating story about a sleazy lawyer who stumbles upon enlightenment.A fascinating story about a sleazy lawyer who stumbles upon enlightenment.
- Awards
- 2 wins total
Shannah Laumeister Stern
- Marie
- (as Shannah Laumeister)
Gordon Jennison Noice
- Joe
- (as Gordon Noice)
Aimée Jeanne Bourgon
- Boyfriend Problems Client
- (as Aimee Bourgon)
Fredrick Burton
- Attorney from Ventura
- (as Fred Burton)
Conrad Angel Corral
- TV Reporter Stevens
- (as Conrad Corral)
Gloria Pryor
- Sara The Tarrot Reader
- (as Gloria Everett)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
What a surprise!
A sleazy lawyer stumbles upon enlightenment!
This film is grounded in the expression of the Buddha nature. I think this is the first time the essence of Buddhism is expressed on the screen. Even if the quote from the Lotus Sutra is unrecognizable to the general audience, everyone can relate to the impact of a single life on so many others and the struggle for meaning in life.
The route to Daniel's enlightenment was laced with social commentary and humor about the mundane routine of life. The lawyer's daily trudging his cases up to the courthouse was a great motif for showing the increasing burden his life and his unraveling before he finds enlightenment. Daniel's struggle between his humanity and his dreary work is something many people can relate to. (I'm especially recommending this to my lawyer friends).
Very good actors, well cast. The direction, camera work, and editing were well done--better than many movies emerging from the independent market. (Clerks, Chuck and Buck come to mind). Visually interesting, particularly that scene where his suicide is envisioned. Powerfully presented.
A sleazy lawyer stumbles upon enlightenment!
This film is grounded in the expression of the Buddha nature. I think this is the first time the essence of Buddhism is expressed on the screen. Even if the quote from the Lotus Sutra is unrecognizable to the general audience, everyone can relate to the impact of a single life on so many others and the struggle for meaning in life.
The route to Daniel's enlightenment was laced with social commentary and humor about the mundane routine of life. The lawyer's daily trudging his cases up to the courthouse was a great motif for showing the increasing burden his life and his unraveling before he finds enlightenment. Daniel's struggle between his humanity and his dreary work is something many people can relate to. (I'm especially recommending this to my lawyer friends).
Very good actors, well cast. The direction, camera work, and editing were well done--better than many movies emerging from the independent market. (Clerks, Chuck and Buck come to mind). Visually interesting, particularly that scene where his suicide is envisioned. Powerfully presented.
10AGV007
It is one of the those films that you must see more than once. A film that has many levels, and makes you think and reflect on life. It is a journey of the soul, and a film that reminds me of a famous line from a famous play: "Most people live their life in quiet desperation."
Sitting through this movie made me realize just how gullible I am by believing a good tag line. This movie, on paper, looks good. I liked the idea, and am not biased toward poor cinematics, poor dialog, and poor acting if the plot or narrative of a story is really original and fresh. Often times all those overcome a poor plot in Hollywood, and sometimes, a superb plot can overcome them.
Sadly, it doesn't happen here.
This movie is a metaphorical train wreck that I kept hoping would reach the destination no matter how horrible the journey - and it doesn't.
Just skip it and watch "The grand canyon" again if you're looking for enlightenment of the human condition.
Sadly, it doesn't happen here.
This movie is a metaphorical train wreck that I kept hoping would reach the destination no matter how horrible the journey - and it doesn't.
Just skip it and watch "The grand canyon" again if you're looking for enlightenment of the human condition.
I was fortunate enough to be invited to a private screening of this film. This is a moving, thought provoking film about all of us. We went to diner afterwards and its all we could talk about. For example, I thought the actress that played Mary, Daniel's wife, was dead on perfect. But others thought that Daniel and Rabi Don Carlos White Wolf were the most interesting.
It was both funny and sad and the characters were so diverse and so rich and the way they were woven around this captivating story is amazing.
It really kept you on your feet, you never knew what was going to happen next and the director ties it all together beautifully at the end.
I won't spoil the end for you, but if you have a chance to see this film, by all means see it!
PS: You may have to see it more than once to get it all!
It was both funny and sad and the characters were so diverse and so rich and the way they were woven around this captivating story is amazing.
It really kept you on your feet, you never knew what was going to happen next and the director ties it all together beautifully at the end.
I won't spoil the end for you, but if you have a chance to see this film, by all means see it!
PS: You may have to see it more than once to get it all!
After seeing Echoes of Enlightenment at the Telluride IndieFest 2002 film festival, I was impressed with the professionalism, polish and general look of the film. The story was compelling and interesting and the acting was strong and convincing. I was particularly impressed with Giovanna Brokaw's performance, which although a small role in the grand scheme of the story and picture, comes across very powerfully.
Overall, the film tugged on my emotions on many levels. That's always a good sign for me, as I tend to be a bit cynical about films of this subject matter. However, it was a well-told story with very important social and spiritual messages.
If I were to offer it any criticism it would be that there are scenes that could be shorter and the overall length of the film is slightly longer than necessary. In my opinion it would be a more powerful film if time had been taken to remove unnecessary exposition that doesn't drive the story foreword. But these are such minor, nick picky issues that you would expect from a fellow filmmaker. So, I'll stop my critique at that note and close with saying it is a film worth seeing and watching.
If Echoes of Enlightenment is an example of Dan Copeland's true talent and not a `one shot wonder', he has the potential of being a great filmmaker.
Overall, the film tugged on my emotions on many levels. That's always a good sign for me, as I tend to be a bit cynical about films of this subject matter. However, it was a well-told story with very important social and spiritual messages.
If I were to offer it any criticism it would be that there are scenes that could be shorter and the overall length of the film is slightly longer than necessary. In my opinion it would be a more powerful film if time had been taken to remove unnecessary exposition that doesn't drive the story foreword. But these are such minor, nick picky issues that you would expect from a fellow filmmaker. So, I'll stop my critique at that note and close with saying it is a film worth seeing and watching.
If Echoes of Enlightenment is an example of Dan Copeland's true talent and not a `one shot wonder', he has the potential of being a great filmmaker.
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Also known as
- Echoes of Enlightenment
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content