The Edgar Wallace Mystery Theatre

It was never a show! or a TV series! it was a cinema film series which was then sold to America as a TV series, and now everybody (for some reason) lists it as a TV series rather than a series of films!! But it was first released to British cinemas by Anglo-Amalgamated as second features between 1962-7, sometimes as a companion to the 'Carry-on' films. Most of the films are very enjoyable, as well as seeing actors like Steptoe & Son's Harry H. Corbett doing something totally different!, in his doing a straight role as a police inspector rather than his usual comedy or seeing Londoner Sir Michael Caine in 'Solo For Sparrow' (1962), with an Irish accent!! What else is new? These were over 30 features made for the 'Edgar Wallace' film series but then (for American TV) it was filled up to 50, so how many are true Edgar Wallace??? Writers like Richard Harris and Roger Marshall have said that none of the films were based on Edgar Wallace stories, but were all original in the same way as the colour series of 'The Saint' with Roger Moore that wasn't based on any Leslie Charteris' stories. It's also good to watch to see future stars at the start of their careers in small roles e.g. Wanda Ventham as a waitress in 'Solo For Sparrow' (1962), future 'Eastenders' and 'Carry On' star Barbara Windsor, as well as Kenneth Cope from 'Randall & Hopkirk (Deceased)' and Barbara Shelly in 'Deathtrap' (1962) with Kenneth Cope again in 'Change Partners' (1965). Great to watch.

Absolutely brilliant programme, watched many times and always enjoy, so much better imagination than a lot of rubbish on tv now.

A series of films with clever plot twists, surprises and the best of British. Looked upon as a TV series, but these were low budget B movies.

The quality does vary somewhat, when they're good, they're great, and episodes such as Change Partners, Ricochet and Playback are all terrific thrillers.

Return to Sender and Locker 69 are the only real clunkers, but in a way, both are still fairly watchable. Sometimes the format did get a little repetitive, and I'd argue that on a few instances there was just a lack of variety.

Expect to see some wonderful, well known faces, the likes of John Thaw, Michael Gough, William Hartnell and of course Michael Caine. Two of my personal favourite performances come from Barry Forster and Kenneth Cope.

That simple, but effective opening sequence still looks great, and that accompanying music still sounds wonderfully haunting.

I love the visuals, the clothes, cars, interiors etc, one thing always gets me, just how busy The High Streets aleUs are.

I'm still struggling to track down The Malpas mystery, for some reason it just seems impossible to track down, one day.

8/10.

I remember my dad watching The Edgar Wallace Mystery Theatre on Australian TV in the 1960s along with the Perry Mason series. I also saw some installments on the big screen at the cinema as a second feature during the 1960s. Excellent production values, sets, top actors and sharp cinema quality black and white photography. Very good scripts with each episode having a good twist in the tail. The series is currently being repeated on early morning free to air TV in Australia. Still stands up as a good mystery anthology series and well worth a view.

Not originally meant as a TV series, The Edgar Wallace Mystery Theatre was a series of B movies, the movies played second in a double feature. In this case the movies were all based on books by Edgar Wallace (surprise, surprise!).

The movies are all murder mysteries and generally involve your standard "murder committed (maybe with a bit of scene setting) - cops arrive and investigate - detective solves case" formula. There are a few exceptions (one of the best episodes has an insurance investigator as the detective).

The plots are pretty good. The murderer is generally not that predictable and there is a fair amount of intrigue, twists and turns. Performances are solid, even for minor characters, and the feel of the movies is one of quality.

However, the character engagement is quite limited. This isn't Poirot: there's no colourful recurring central character. Nearly every movie has a different bunch of characters, including the lead detective, and it's all straightforward, by-the-book policework. There's very little in the way of sub-plots or humour: it's all pretty dour.

Overall: interesting enough, but not brilliant.