IMDb RATING
7.1/10
3.1K
YOUR RATING
A balloon wraps itself around a young child's hand, bringing him higher and higher, much to the child's delight... but...A balloon wraps itself around a young child's hand, bringing him higher and higher, much to the child's delight... but...A balloon wraps itself around a young child's hand, bringing him higher and higher, much to the child's delight... but...
- Director
- Writer
- Awards
- 23 wins & 5 nominations total
Featured reviews
This is a replacement comment. The original bothered a diligent reader, so I have made some expansion.
Animation is like any film type: artists ally to certain philosophies, perhaps without realizing it. In the case of animation, it bumps up against that great American invention, noir. That's the notion that there is a world in the movie that is manipulated by forces unseen. Hapless characters are the manipulated and the fact that we are on the scene influences that manipulation somehow.
With animation, its all about how objects act, how the environment conspires or not. Not all animators deal with objects the same way.
In my original comment, I made two assertions. One was that the Czech animator Jan Svankmajer was sort of an icon for and a teacher of one school of philosophy so far as this cinematic religion. It has nothing at all to do with darkness, or political statements, or humor that is all applied superficially. Its about how the strings behind the world are connected; what objects MEAN and how we sit on some of those strings. I say that Hertzfeldt is in this tradition and that he changes it not a whit.
Does that make him less of an artist? That's up to you. He masters the philosophy without changing it, but his mastery is more engaging. Its the difference between the guy who writes the movie and the actor, between the composer and the fiddler. You decide.
The second point I made was that I supposed Hertzfeldt saw a rough version of "pad" that was being circulated in film schools at the time. The stories there and here are similar. I am NOT saying he plagiarized, but to me the influence is clear.
Having restated these two points, I can say that
1) this is fun.
2) this is not important in my mind. He's done stuff that is, and I would like you to see it instead. It is not personal, nor unique, nor valuable watching like some of Hertzfeldts stuff can be. Pass on this unless you don't want to explore better stuff.
Ted's Evaluation -- 1 of 3: You can find something better to do with this part of your life.
Animation is like any film type: artists ally to certain philosophies, perhaps without realizing it. In the case of animation, it bumps up against that great American invention, noir. That's the notion that there is a world in the movie that is manipulated by forces unseen. Hapless characters are the manipulated and the fact that we are on the scene influences that manipulation somehow.
With animation, its all about how objects act, how the environment conspires or not. Not all animators deal with objects the same way.
In my original comment, I made two assertions. One was that the Czech animator Jan Svankmajer was sort of an icon for and a teacher of one school of philosophy so far as this cinematic religion. It has nothing at all to do with darkness, or political statements, or humor that is all applied superficially. Its about how the strings behind the world are connected; what objects MEAN and how we sit on some of those strings. I say that Hertzfeldt is in this tradition and that he changes it not a whit.
Does that make him less of an artist? That's up to you. He masters the philosophy without changing it, but his mastery is more engaging. Its the difference between the guy who writes the movie and the actor, between the composer and the fiddler. You decide.
The second point I made was that I supposed Hertzfeldt saw a rough version of "pad" that was being circulated in film schools at the time. The stories there and here are similar. I am NOT saying he plagiarized, but to me the influence is clear.
Having restated these two points, I can say that
1) this is fun.
2) this is not important in my mind. He's done stuff that is, and I would like you to see it instead. It is not personal, nor unique, nor valuable watching like some of Hertzfeldts stuff can be. Pass on this unless you don't want to explore better stuff.
Ted's Evaluation -- 1 of 3: You can find something better to do with this part of your life.
There's some twisted stuff going on in "Billy's Balloon"and it is hilarious. Why in the world would a balloon want to attack a small child? And what harm could it possibly do? Don Hertzfeldt happily answers one of those questions and this is a fine example of simplistic animation (and perverse intent) executed for serious laughs. the sens of humor is fantastic; just when you think you know what'll happen, Hertzfeldt flips the script. Violent without being violent.
The man's a genius.
8/10
The man's a genius.
8/10
Animation in all its glory! As an animation student myself, and having made quite a few short stick-figure deaths and such to amuse myself during class, I can fully appreciate the brilliance of "Billy's Balloon." Luckily, I hadn't read anything about what was going to happen and was pleasantly surprised as the mayhem of Billy's balloon started and every time I thought the joke was getting old, a whole other element was thrown in. A great short film which I will hopefully find again someday.
This short film from Don Hertzfeldt is a very sadistic film indeed and seems to possibly be inspired (in a negative way) by the "classic" French short film, THE RED BALLOON. Because Hertzfeldt is a very bizarre person with a sick sense of humor, the red balloon in this film is a nasty piece of work--spending the entire film either pummeling the poor kid or dropping him from extreme heights again and again. There certainly isn't anything deep or philosophical here--just stick figure-like beings getting the crap knocked out of them by Satanic balloons.
This film is highly recommended for teens, sick and twisted adults and,...um...that's all. As for artsy folks out there, DON'T see this under any circumstances. It will offend you and taint your opinions of THE RED BALLOON!
This film is highly recommended for teens, sick and twisted adults and,...um...that's all. As for artsy folks out there, DON'T see this under any circumstances. It will offend you and taint your opinions of THE RED BALLOON!
There are few things in this ugly world which inspire me more than the resistance of those being oppressed against the oppressors themselves. We all know the type, we recognize it in our lives and in popular culture. Who doesn't love an underdog? George Washington, Che Gueverra,, and now Billy's Balloon. I recognize how important the act of rebellion and the spirit of resistance is in order for meaningful socio-political and economic change in our modern environment and culture. However, it is because of this, difficult in equal measure to denounce the oppressed turning their oppression back on their oppressors and oppressing them instead. This film is a gleeful and blithesome depiction of both of these separate but essential moments in the cycle of species-wide and generational self-destruction we collectively set out upon in our metaphorical and symbolic Garden of Eden. It is because of this universal understanding of the resistance trope that Don Hertfeldt's "BILLY'S BALLOON" works so well: it's an incredibly deft and acuitus subversion of audience expectations. We all understand that nothing is ever going to change. It's a vicious circle, or so they say. And Don Hertzfeld understands that. Make no mistake, the cartoonish violence in this film is "funny". But there is a deep, dark layer of this film frankly too rarely spoken about.
Did you know
- TriviaHertzfeldt originally submitted this Grand Jury Award-Winning short film as his class project. He got a "B".
- ConnectionsEdited into Spike & Mike's Classic Festival of Animation 1999 (1999)
Details
- Runtime
- 6m
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content