Blow Job
- 1963
- 35m
IMDb RATING
4.6/10
1.2K
YOUR RATING
Andy Warhol directs a single 35-minute shot of a man's face to capture his facial expressions as he receives the sexual act depicted in the title.Andy Warhol directs a single 35-minute shot of a man's face to capture his facial expressions as he receives the sexual act depicted in the title.Andy Warhol directs a single 35-minute shot of a man's face to capture his facial expressions as he receives the sexual act depicted in the title.
- Director
- Stars
DeVeren Bookwalter
- The Receiver
- (uncredited)
Willard Maas
- The Giver
- (uncredited)
Featured reviews
This is not an attack as Empire, nor a nice impression as Sleep, but just a short joke. There is quite a lot of action in the face and it takes only 36 minutes. You will probably forget it as soon as it finishes.
Warhol's films had a lot in common with porn in that, no matter the subject, they tended to be exercises in repetition. If you are the type to find a certain fetishistic beauty in such a visual process, then you might enjoy this. Warhol was also quite the visual stylist. Despite the popular perception, he was a fairly hands on director. I've seen his editing and lighting notes and know from speaking with people that knew him that he took a keen interest in how all of his work looked. By the way, for those who care to know, the guy doing the blowing is Willard Maas.
One last word: If you really do want to see a spectacular depiction of oral sex, I'd recommend Blowjob Fantasies Volume XI.
One last word: If you really do want to see a spectacular depiction of oral sex, I'd recommend Blowjob Fantasies Volume XI.
Like all of Warhol's works, one does not need to see this film to understand all of it. It works better as an idea rather than a product, while lacking the boldness of, say, Duchamp's Fountain.
The idea by itself is interesting: an attempt to catch a man's facial expressions and emotions (maybe thoughts?) while receiving oral sex. But it fails to deliver.
The result was simply a very boring movie, which drags itself along over 27 minutes. Trying to find innuendos, enlightening messages, eroticism or any deeper concept behind the scene requires an enormous dose of imagination.
The receiving "actor" is cute, but mostly bland, seeming incapable of expressing a consistent sense of pleasure, remorse, satisfaction or whatsoever.
A total waste of time. I wouldn't recommend it at all.
The result was simply a very boring movie, which drags itself along over 27 minutes. Trying to find innuendos, enlightening messages, eroticism or any deeper concept behind the scene requires an enormous dose of imagination.
The receiving "actor" is cute, but mostly bland, seeming incapable of expressing a consistent sense of pleasure, remorse, satisfaction or whatsoever.
A total waste of time. I wouldn't recommend it at all.
I saw this in an art house theatre and when the feature was over comments could be heard like "such artistic talent" etc.
Well I love Warhol's paintings, him being my favourite artist, but found that this film was frankly boring. I could see no logic as to why this should be a film and not a painting where it would work much better. It does not hold your attention for more than 2 minutes.
To be honest.. boring tripe. Avoid at all costs. Go to a gallery and see his real art... superb. The only great Warhol film I've actually seen is Harlot, not listed in the imdb.
Well I love Warhol's paintings, him being my favourite artist, but found that this film was frankly boring. I could see no logic as to why this should be a film and not a painting where it would work much better. It does not hold your attention for more than 2 minutes.
To be honest.. boring tripe. Avoid at all costs. Go to a gallery and see his real art... superb. The only great Warhol film I've actually seen is Harlot, not listed in the imdb.
Did you know
- TriviaAlthough he is unseen in the film, the individual performing the sex act has been widely identified as Willard Maas.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Warhol's Cinema 1963-1968: Mirror for the Sixties (1989)
Details
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Andy Warhol's Blowjob
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 35m
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.33 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content