A black comedy about vanity and lust in contemporary America. In the middle of the sexual jungle of New York's singles' world, two men and two women try to achieve their dreams.A black comedy about vanity and lust in contemporary America. In the middle of the sexual jungle of New York's singles' world, two men and two women try to achieve their dreams.A black comedy about vanity and lust in contemporary America. In the middle of the sexual jungle of New York's singles' world, two men and two women try to achieve their dreams.
- Awards
- 2 wins & 1 nomination total
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
This has just taken over from the Blair Witch Project as the most terrifying movie i've ever seen. And just like it, you come away thinking, 'Could it be real?'.
My answer? Surely not. Such pure dating horror couldn't exist in the world I live in. That's what I keep saying to myself anyway, and it helps me get to sleep most nights.
Four NY singles come across as some of the most unrelentingly relationship-resistant types to ever appear on screen. Their dances with romances seem forever doomed and watching them crash and burn through a few apparently real months in their lives will strike terror into the hearts of singles of any age. Is it a comedy? A satire? All I can say for sure is that it's surely one of the worst ever first date films I can conceive of.
Compelling viewing for the rest of us though.
My answer? Surely not. Such pure dating horror couldn't exist in the world I live in. That's what I keep saying to myself anyway, and it helps me get to sleep most nights.
Four NY singles come across as some of the most unrelentingly relationship-resistant types to ever appear on screen. Their dances with romances seem forever doomed and watching them crash and burn through a few apparently real months in their lives will strike terror into the hearts of singles of any age. Is it a comedy? A satire? All I can say for sure is that it's surely one of the worst ever first date films I can conceive of.
Compelling viewing for the rest of us though.
I disagree with Kobenhavn. But I produced the movie, so why wouldn't I? Let me point out the film played for 5 months in one theater in New York, 2 months in theaters in San Francisco and Chicago, and received rave reviews from nearly every important critic. "Fascinating and highly original
on all counts, one of the most interesting films this year". (Jonathan Rosenbaum, Chicago Reader). "One of the most original films of the year". (David Denby, New York Magazine). "Sharp, funny, sad, haunting, fascinating, Lurid, and voyeuristic". (Owen Gliberman, Entertainment Weekly). And so on.
Filmmaker Barker found four very different losers-in-love in the personal ads and got to know them for months, writing a script based on their personalities and experiences. He then filmed it as if it were a traditional documentary, with the people playing themselves.
The characters are always interesting, if all sad, and often pathetic as well as pathetically funny.
Sometimes it feels exploitational – don't these people know how sad, and sometimes crazy they come off? Yet there's something that feels like these people consciously chose to be seen for who they were, warts and all. Better that than continue to exist in the lonely hole of obscurity.
And a simple visual touch at the very end puts a slightly more empathetic, less cruel spin on the film.
I couldn't quite love it, but I respect it's bravery in trying something new, its dark humor, and its unblinking eye. But I suspect an unmanipulated documentary might have been even more powerful. Here, we're never sure how deeply to hurt for these people, or how awful or cruel to feel at laughing at them, because we don't know when what we're seeing is 'true' – which makes for interesting debates about 'reality', but also creates a bit of emotional disconnect. But just a bit
The characters are always interesting, if all sad, and often pathetic as well as pathetically funny.
Sometimes it feels exploitational – don't these people know how sad, and sometimes crazy they come off? Yet there's something that feels like these people consciously chose to be seen for who they were, warts and all. Better that than continue to exist in the lonely hole of obscurity.
And a simple visual touch at the very end puts a slightly more empathetic, less cruel spin on the film.
I couldn't quite love it, but I respect it's bravery in trying something new, its dark humor, and its unblinking eye. But I suspect an unmanipulated documentary might have been even more powerful. Here, we're never sure how deeply to hurt for these people, or how awful or cruel to feel at laughing at them, because we don't know when what we're seeing is 'true' – which makes for interesting debates about 'reality', but also creates a bit of emotional disconnect. But just a bit
Whether the story is entirely true or in some parts made up, as the director stated it is, is unimportant; the film covers the intriguing subject matter of how four single New Yorkers exist for a period of nine months, featuring the real lives of two female and two male actors who play themselves, concerned with getting older and still being single. Their single scene is provocatively portrayed as being sad and luridly comical. It is a film that highlights the problems that can be found in urban areas across America, as we bear witness to the plight of these singles trying to search for a mate through the internet and the personals, faced with agonizing loneliness and unresolved psychological problems. That these four are not particularly people that I can readily sympathize with, does not alter the fact that this is a very human story being told, one that has many implications on our culture, relating how alienated a people so many of us have become in this modern world.
I really liked this movie. Unlike some other viewers, I thought that it was very true movie. It sure shows the reality of lonesome hearts and of celibacy. The actors are very comfortable with the camera and very natural, which is very refreshing.
This movie talks about a very sad, depressing topic on a light mood, which brings a nice contrast. The images are beautiful and the scenes of the city, all those people behind windows, just as if we were voyeur is really fascinating. Just in the same mood than _Dreaming with the fishes_ or _Happiness_: good american cinema (please, not hollywoodian!)
This movie talks about a very sad, depressing topic on a light mood, which brings a nice contrast. The images are beautiful and the scenes of the city, all those people behind windows, just as if we were voyeur is really fascinating. Just in the same mood than _Dreaming with the fishes_ or _Happiness_: good american cinema (please, not hollywoodian!)
Did you know
- TriviaBarker shot the film in NY City with a tiny crew of seven people over the period of a full year, through all four seasons. He and his staff had first interviewed nearly a thousand candidates for the leads, picked four after an arduous process, then edited the transcripts of their video interviews, and shot the final film on film carefully directing them in the new truthful, but more dramatic script.
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Άστρωτα κρεβάτια
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $1,000,000 (estimated)
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content