[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Naked Souls

  • 1996
  • R
  • 1h 25m
IMDb RATING
3.3/10
2K
YOUR RATING
Pamela Anderson in Naked Souls (1996)
An artist tries to rescue her scientist boyfriend, who has switched bodies with an evil, elderly genius.
Play trailer2:11
1 Video
20 Photos
Sci-FiThriller

An artist tries to rescue her scientist boyfriend, who has switched bodies with an evil, elderly genius.An artist tries to rescue her scientist boyfriend, who has switched bodies with an evil, elderly genius.An artist tries to rescue her scientist boyfriend, who has switched bodies with an evil, elderly genius.

  • Director
    • Lyndon Chubbuck
  • Writers
    • Frank Dietz
    • Randolf Turrow
  • Stars
    • Brian Krause
    • Pamela Anderson
    • David Warner
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    3.3/10
    2K
    YOUR RATING
    • Director
      • Lyndon Chubbuck
    • Writers
      • Frank Dietz
      • Randolf Turrow
    • Stars
      • Brian Krause
      • Pamela Anderson
      • David Warner
    • 24User reviews
    • 9Critic reviews
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • Videos1

    Trailer
    Trailer 2:11
    Trailer

    Photos20

    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    + 12
    View Poster

    Top cast20

    Edit
    Brian Krause
    Brian Krause
    • Edward
    Pamela Anderson
    Pamela Anderson
    • Britt
    David Warner
    David Warner
    • Everett Longstreet
    Dean Stockwell
    Dean Stockwell
    • Duncan
    Clayton Rohner
    Clayton Rohner
    • Jerry
    Justina Vail
    Justina Vail
    • Amelia
    Victor Talmadge
    • Travis
    Elizabeth Low
    • Model
    Deryl Carroll
    • Clinic Doctor
    Pat Millicano
    Pat Millicano
    • 1st Paramedic
    • (as Pat Malicano)
    Alex Manette
    Alex Manette
    • 2nd paramedic
    Yonda Davis
    • Nurse
    Jennifer Collins
    Jennifer Collins
    • Hospital Doctor
    Michael Papajohn
    Michael Papajohn
    • Driver
    Thomas Milan
    • Homeless Man
    Christopher Holder
    • Cop
    Chantel Rae
    Chantel Rae
    • Woman in bath
    • (as Chantel King)
    Jackie Brune
    • Woman in Car
    • Director
      • Lyndon Chubbuck
    • Writers
      • Frank Dietz
      • Randolf Turrow
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews24

    3.31.9K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    6Red-Barracuda

    Pamela makes this sci-fi thriller watchable

    An elderly, crippled scientist offers funding to a struggling experimenter who is working on a new thought-transferral procedure. He tricks the younger guy by transferring his soul between their bodies. What complicates matters is that the soul of a dead serial killer gets mixed in creating dangerous impulses.

    This sci-fi thriller is one of an easily identifiable type of movie whose only real selling point is its nudity. I say easily identifiable because the cover imagery in these films always plays up the presence of the sexy girl who they have hired for the eye candy. In this instance it's the very beautiful Pamela Anderson who the film-makers had at their disposal. She is by a massive distance, the only thing of any merit in this film. Despite what most of us hope for, she isn't naked very often but when she is she is delectable. Actually, come to think of it, even when she is fully clothed she is pretty delectable here too. She may be eye candy but she is premier division eye candy. In this film she plays a performance artist who likes to pour paint onto the bodies of semi-naked girls. As good as this idea is it isn't unfortunately explored in quite enough detail for my liking!

    The problem with the movie, however, is that the plot-line kind of gets in the way a bit too much. It's not that a soft-core film can never successfully blend a narrative in with erotic moments – another Anderson vehicle Snapdragon does this fairly well. The main problem here is that despite being top-billed, this film mainly neglects her, choosing instead to focus on the two scientists in their none-too interesting experiments. And once the soul transferral experiment happens, the whole serial killer part of the story is very badly mishandled - it never plays up even remotely closely to its thrilling possibilities. Ultimately, this is a movie that sets up an interesting enough, if unoriginal set of ideas but doesn't deliver much on its early promise. It stars David Warner in the role as the elder scientist and Dean Stockwell in a blink-and-you'll-miss-him cameo. But at the end of the day, the only sane reason to watch this is to see the very lovely Ms Anderson.
    5gridoon

    Naked Pamela

    Taken as a sci-fi thriller, "Naked Souls" lies somewhere between "mediocre" and "not bad". The ideas (mind-switching, memory transfer, etc) are intriguing, even if they have been used in many other films (the French thriller "La Machine", with Depardieu, is one that comes to mind), but this film goes nowhere with them. However, Pamela Anderson looks breathtakingly gorgeous here (I don't remember ever seeing her look better), and she has one particularly sensual sex scene (damn was her partner a lucky guy!). The filmmakers must have liked that scene too, because they repeat it in the last few minutes....and it's actually better the second time because it's not intercut (like it is the first time) with David Warner's reactions. No disrespect to Warner, who is a fine actor, but he kind of kills the mood in this instance, if you know what I mean....(**)
    chickmagnetcrabbman

    If you're a fan of Pam, go for it

    The acting and plotting of this film is just plain boring and pretty terrible. If, however, you like to see Pamela Anderson's fantastic body (I do, but it doesn't make a film), then you'll get something out of this. The T&A is highly enjoyable, but ultimately this film feels pointless and uninteresting. 2/10.
    Gislef

    Saying Pamela Anderson...

    ...is the best part of a movie is truly scary, but there it is. She and Brian Krause roll around naked, while David Warner and Dean Stockwell do the best they can to save this turkey. However, the basic plot is mediocre at best: even a better actress (meaning...well just about anyone, except maybe Anna Nicole Smith) and Sir John Gielgud would have had their work cut out for them making anything out of this plot.
    4Uriah43

    Watchable-But Just Barely

    "Edward" (Brian Krause) is a scientist who is experimenting with capturing memories from dead people. His girlfriend, "Britt" (Pamela Anderson) is an artist. Lately, Edward hasn't spent much time with Britt and this is putting a huge strain on their relationship. Likewise, the fact that Edward has just been denied a grant to continue his research is adding to his stress levels. All of a sudden a famous scientist named "Everett Longstreet" (David Warner) comes along and offers Edward his entire estate. But there is a catch. Anyway, rather than disclose any of the mysteries of this film I will just say that I suppose it is watchable--but just barely. Obviously, the main attraction in this movie is Pamela Anderson and her presence certainly helped. Additionally, David Warner and Dean Stockwell (as "Duncan") also performed adequately. But the main problem with this film was the clumsy dialogue which impacted everyone's performance to a degree but most notably that of Brian Krause. In short, other than Pamela Anderson there really isn't anything remarkable about this film and I rate it as slightly below average.

    More like this

    Raw Justice
    4.2
    Raw Justice
    Snapdragon
    3.8
    Snapdragon
    Barb Wire
    3.6
    Barb Wire
    Une nuit en enfer 3 - La fille du bourreau
    4.8
    Une nuit en enfer 3 - La fille du bourreau
    Psychose meurtrière
    5.8
    Psychose meurtrière
    Une nuit en enfer 2 : Le Prix du sang
    4.2
    Une nuit en enfer 2 : Le Prix du sang
    La Nuit des chauves-souris
    4.1
    La Nuit des chauves-souris
    Un subtil parfum de scandale
    4.2
    Un subtil parfum de scandale
    Confidences Interdites
    4.8
    Confidences Interdites
    Péchés Capitaux
    4.2
    Péchés Capitaux
    Comportements troublants
    5.7
    Comportements troublants
    Feast III: The Happy Finish
    4.8
    Feast III: The Happy Finish

    Related interests

    James Earl Jones and David Prowse in L'Empire contre-attaque (1980)
    Sci-Fi
    Cho Yeo-jeong in Parasite (2019)
    Thriller

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Trivia
      Pamela Anderson justified her participation in the movie's sex scenes by claiming that they were important to the story and saying that she trusted the filmmakers. Lyndon Chubbuck had previously directed her in three episodes of Alerte à Malibu (1989).
    • Connections
      Referenced in The Angry Video Game Nerd: V.I.P. With Pamela Anderson (2014)

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    FAQ15

    • How long is Naked Souls?Powered by Alexa

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • May 18, 1996 (United States)
    • Country of origin
      • United States
    • Language
      • English
    • Also known as
      • Çıplak ruhlar
    • Production companies
      • Mr. E Productions Inc.
      • Vanguard Entertainment
      • WarnerVision Films
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Box office

    Edit
    • Budget
      • $500,000 (estimated)
    See detailed box office info on IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      • 1h 25m(85 min)
    • Color
      • Color
    • Sound mix
      • Ultra Stereo
    • Aspect ratio
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.