Witchcraft VI

Although it pretends to be a horror film, this is really soft core porn at its sleaziest. The good thing is, it's pretty funny at times, and the tongue and cheek style makes an otherwise run of the mill horror pic watchable. Hustler centerfold Stefania Swinney is drop dead gorgeous as the innocent victim at the beginning of the film.

I enjoyed this film, sure it's not the best occult film out there, hell, it isn't even a very good occult film, but it does work as a good softcore flick in that it delivers the goods (i.e. ample female nudity) and doesn't mess around with taking itself too seriously. Something that is good to find in these sorts of films, all too often, I try to rent some video, hoping to see gratuitious skin and instead am stuck watching some horrible attempt at "suspense," and left with little to no actual skin, ugh. I was rather relieved to catch an amusing flick with healthy doses of nudity. I also liked the stupid cop scenes because, well, I think cops eating donuts are funny. Check it out if you're a fan of the series or an Andy Sidaris fan. I give it 8/10 stars!

Willy warlock returns in this 6th outing but is played by yet another actor.

It tells the story of Willy brought in to assist the police in a case regarding a serial killer targetting women who wear crosses around their necks.

As is the case with the past couple of films the franchise seems to have heavily gone in the T&A direction. When you have keywords like "Sex on the floor" and "Fondling breasts" it's probably best you go in with low expectations.

I think out of the six thus far this is the worst, the plot is baffling and the movie as a whole really doesn't have any redeeming qualities. For horny teenagers I can even confirm that the nudity is incompetently done alike everything else.

Witchcraft VI can be tossed on the pile as another mess of a film.

The Good:

Nope

The Bad:

Dreadful sfx

Daft story

Cast are pretty bad

Things I Learnt From This Movie:

When film creators can't even do nudity right they should probably seek employment elsewhere

Not as bad as your lead to believe. This is a very long series of movies so not everyone is going to be a hit out of the park. But you should at least give it a chance and you should not go into this expecting anything more than a B-movie because that's exactly what you're going to get. Still decent either way.

So why 10 out of 10? Mainly to counteract the "Academy". The Academy believes that no film which does not deal directly with some left-wing (gay anything!) societal issue, have a completely depressing ending, or at the very least involve unattractive actors mumbling philosophical nonsense to each other in Swedish or French has any right to be seen. Not so! Klaus Kinski in Herzog's "Aguirre, the Wrath of God" is tedious enough to make me want to peel off my own flesh. Stephanie Swinney in "Witchcraft 6", on the other hand, leads me to believe that some flesh just needs to be appreciated. It should be remembered that in its beginnings cinema never aspired to the status of art. It was entertainment pure and simple. That some film has indeed achieved the status of art is both inarguable and laudable, but it would be unwise to denigrate that which aims to merely titillate or entertain.