Personnel et confidentiel

Ethics, love, dedication and overcoming, these are some of the basic ingredients to achieve success in all fields, both personally and professionally. This may be the alchemy that made "Up Close and Personal", a sweet, true film capable of touching audiences around the world. Jon Avnet, expert in the art of emotion, without using cliché, or even resorting to fetched subterfuge, managed once again to tell a story with the delicacy and subtlety that the human soul needs.

Sally Atwater (Michelle Pfeiffer) plays a girl who dreamed of becoming a journalist. Even without professional training, she creates a video to ask for a job in several stations. Sally, totally confused, arrives at TV Miami and finds the head of journalism, Warren Justice (Robert Redford), a veteran journalist, passionate about the profession and who doesn't sell his ethical principles for fame or money. Because of this he has his career boycotted. Position to some extent questioned by colleagues in the profession, being, among other things, considered a difficult person to deal with.

Justice, a name that enhances the personality of the editor-in-chief, even knowing that Sally Atwater has no experience in the area, manages to see her potential and accepts her as an intern, becoming his mentor. One day, after making Sally serve too many coffees, he lets her be the weather girl, then, by fate, she has the opportunity to be live in a story. Over time, she gradually becomes established professionally and the relationship between him and his mentor becomes a great passion.

A kind of "A Star is Born" within journalism, "Intimate & Personal" is a production that does not reach all its potential. Not even remotely close to the brilliance of his "Fried Green Tomatoes", Jon Avnet delivers a work that is just right, albeit often with excessive narrative simplicity. Robert Redford doesn't have much to do in the shoes of Warren Justice, a character without great complexity, and even Michelle Pfeiffer, despite her charisma and talent, can't go beyond the limits of a protagonist portrayed with insecurity by the script: in the first half from the film, Tally is a romantic comedy character, with even some humorous scenes (which don't always work); and in the final stretch, she assumes the air of a tragic heroine, with tearful moments underlined by the beautiful "Because you loved me", in the voice of Celine Dion. This almost schizophrenia of the film is what makes it difficult for the audience to fully engage in its story - it can even move the most sensitive, but, compared to what it could have been (especially with all the dramas lived by Savitch, its original inspiration), it's just a derivative and predictable drama.

Still, the romantic drama is a well-crafted mix of technical, textual, visual, and sound aspects. From the selection of actors - Michelle Pfeifer and Robert Redford identified with the characters forming an accomplice and captivating pair - to the choice of songs - the film won the Oscar for best song with the aforementioned "Because You Loved Me"-, in everything we try to convey the message of renewal to the public in a simple, beautiful and sensitive way.

The film uses many metaphors, even by genre, working on the meaning of words to insinuate the context. Some examples are when Warren refers to Tally as commenting that "she devours the lens", foreshadowing her competence and success, or when he tells her that she is "not good company in the morning" to warn that he was not good with relationships. But the film's deepest metaphor is the one that refers to the true value of a journalist, "what we in the news cannot forget is that we are worth the stories we tell".

Warren and Tally's characters were built on a stereotype of the television journalist as someone very concerned with the image and little with the message, with the purpose of transmitting to millions of viewers a fact that, although it may not interest them, positively or negatively influences your life. Warren is an upstanding, honorable, idealistic, committed and serious journalist who, for that very reason, is considered difficult, intractable and has a "thorny" career. (One particularity: this role played by Robert Redford, is very similar to his personality. The actor, like the character, is considered in his environment a difficult person, who only does things his way).

Tally, on the other hand, is a sensitive and hardworking woman, with a strong yet captivating personality. Her identity construction takes place throughout the film, allowing the audience to reflect on how an inexperienced reporter, if well guided, can become an excellent journalist. Tally, always worried about appearing early, finds herself suddenly being rejected by the public, devastated by the rival anchor who exposes her to ridicule in certain situations, shaking her self-esteem and shaking her career, until Warren helps her see: "Give it to me." them Tally Atwater, he says. Where is Tally Atwater? To earn the trust of millions of viewers, you need to hear what they say." And Tally finally understands what it means to be a reporter and surprises herself by doing a great story alone and conquering the highest position of a journalistic career.

An aspect of great formal beauty in the work is the scene in which Tally decides to improvise, instead of following what was written on the teleprompter, at the moment of her thanks. And speaking with the voice of her heart, freeing herself from patterns and definitely taking possession of herself, she thanks those who really deserve applause. "I'm just here to tell a story," she concludes. In "Up Close and Personal", the idea behind the romance of the characters Tally Atwater and Warren Justice, seems to be to demonstrate to the general public the human frailty. Using the love plot, the author seems to denounce, in the exposition of the characters' daily lives, the great struggle of all of us against our own weaknesses and ills. He then seeks to demonstrate the need for hope, determination, and character.

But in the end, there has to be some conflict. Something has to be problematized for the film to sustain itself. And director Jon Avnet knows his craft. He introduces the viewer to the intimacy of TV without offending anyone, but does not let naivety organize the narrative. Build a group of very nice but not silly characters. In addition, Avnet is lenient with the institution he analyzes, TV, but he does not fail to point out some thorns. And, above all, he values his actors, making an efficient vehicle (for protagonists and supporting actors).

"Telling the story of the couple of journalists", the author proposes a deeper reflection of journalistic ethics. And most interesting of all... Through the film, he says exactly what his characters experienced: that he (the author) is there, making this film, to "tell a story"... And, who knows, offer the public a new nuance of facts for reflection... In the film, the great debate is the eternal doubt between getting an audience at any cost and discovering the truth of facts and being. It is wrong to think that it is an exclusive story for communication professionals. It is a love story framed by ethics, dedication and overcoming that enchants and makes everyone reflect.

The film tries to give an idea of the difficulties of TV journalists to succeed and the problems they may face during the job. The director of the film seems to be interested of what may happen in Cuba, and the film touches partially the ethic of contra group in Miami. It also shows how mass media are always behind sensation of the news, sometimes sacrificing the life of the reporters, and this is what happened to Robert Redford, one of the heros of the film. This is not an easy film to be seen, but the argument is acceptable.

It has been a long time since a film has made me cry. I can't remember crying like this since Beaches and Steel Magnolias years ago. To be honest the movie seemed a little boring and overacted to start with - Pfeiffer was very much as she had been in Dangerous Minds, controversial and unique (not that that is a bad thing, just repetitive). However, once you move past the 'a star is born' bit, the developing relationship between Warren Justice (Redford) and Tally Attwater is a beautiful and believable one. It is also interesting to get a look at how the TV news may operate behind-the-scenes.

Unlike so many star couplets today, Redford and Pfeiffer have true on-screen chemistry and are at their best in this film.

"Up Close and Personal" proves again that charismatic stars and good production values can overcome a weak story. This story of two television journalists (Redford and Pfeiffer) has few surprises, no fresh insights about the news business, and its big moments are both predictable and overblown. Nevertheless, Redford and Pfeiffer provide enough star power to make for a reasonably entertaining couple of hours. There is one particularly funny line, though. When the Pfeiffer character says of a co-worker, "He's so stupid!" her boyfriend, the Redford character, with a quizzical expression on his face, says, "He's an anchorman." 6 out of 10, marginally recommended.

Director: Jon Avnet Running Time: 124 minutes Rated PG-13 (for some sensuality, language, and brief violence)

"Up Close & Personal" is one hundred percent a chick flick-but it is an effective one. With his new romantic drama director Jon Avnet has created a relevant, realistic, interesting behind-the-scenes look at news broadcasting, relationships, and journalism.

The story centers on a young energetic woman, named Sally Atwater, who, in desperation to find the job of her dreams, sends an application to be a television newscaster and work with the biggest names in the business. One of them is Warren Justice, played cleverly by Robert Redford, who lives an opposite life from the clumsy, tactless, and silly Sally. Of course she gets the job, falls in love with Warren, and experiences difficulties with her occupation as well as romance.

The film's first act is near perfect: it introduces the characters and guidelines, exactly what a good first act is supposed to do. We initially meet an opportunity starving underdog, the external conflict, then move on the romantic complications in the second act, the internal conflict. The second act also provides the gradual increase in romantic chemistry; for once we don't have a typical love at first sight story. Both problems are eventually resolved efficiently, but getting there is what contains the original felling.

What makes the characters so relateable in "Up Close & Personal" is the people who they are. Sally is a down-to-earth human being, blooming with cute charm and amiable qualities. She isn't presented as a glamorous, high stakes, important individual, but completely the opposite--perhaps a little too underdogish at times. Warren provides us with a stern opposite to Sally, forming tension. Their slow character development is totally appropriate, as well as effective, here.

The leading characters are played delicately by Robert Redford and Michelle Pfeiffer; the right choice for each. Both pay special attention to the nitty gritty details within the characters. They are very careful not too overdue their characters and subdue the audience. This is not a deep picture, although the closing may catch a few unexpected viewers weeping, it's a light hearted, evenly presented, well-plotted romantic comedy-the filmmakers don't often pretend otherwise.

"Up Close & Personal" is not your typical love story. It is not slow moving, but full of colorful characters, interesting situations, focused point of views, and a suave atmosphere. It is a romantic comedy worth the watch time and your money.

Brought to you by Touchstone Pictures.