Shootfighter II

Greetings And Salutations, and welcome to my review of Shootfighter II; here's the breakdown of my ratings:

Story: 0.75 Direction: 1.00 Pace: 0.75 Acting: 1.00 Enjoyment: 1.25

TOTAL: 4.75 out of 10.00

I rebuked the original Shootfighter, though only slightly, for not possessing an original script. Well, in the sequel, the writers attempt to add intrigue and stratagems. Sadly, neither the writers nor the director makes the film intriguing or engrossing.

The concept of the story is adequate. A police detective, having lost his son to an illegal "Death Match" Shootfight, enlists the help of a few martial artists to bring the killer promoters before the law. It only needs Master Shingo to hear that his brother is running the show, to offer him and his students help. So, off to Miami go Ruben, Nick, Master Shingo, and Shark. Since this martial arts flick has taken a slight detour into the thriller genre, there are a few twists in the tale. However, these suffer heavily from being much-used deceits. So when Detective Rawlins warns his stool-pigeon that if he crosses him, there will be trouble, you're waiting for the cross to come. And, in fact, most things in this thriller are predictable, and that's sad. They had a chance to create a solid and fresh story. What the audience receives, once again, is regurgitated leftovers.

The direction is worse than the original film. At least in that picture, the director knew how to shoot the fight scenes to make them engaging and exciting for the viewer. Paul Ziller, however, doesn't manage to hit the same highs. Most of the action sequences and chases are by the book and are rather dull - Considering the steady pace of the movie, it's not unexpected.

It would have helped massively had they not hired Chase Randolph to play Detective Lew Rawlins. For one thing, he's a Swiss-Cheese walking and talking. His performance lacks the skill, and he is cheesy to the max. I constantly wished one of the fighters would knock that grin right off his mug. Sadly, that never happens. The worst thing is everybody else is okay, so his acting deficiency is obvious, making it more of a distraction and hindrance to the viewer.

If you've watched and enjoyed Shootfighter, then feel free to check out the sequel; you'll probably enjoy it. Though, if you haven't, I'd recommend the original over this tiresome film.

Please feel free to visit my Holding Out For A Hero and The Game Is Afoot lists to see where I ranked ShootfighterII.

Take Care & Stay Well.

Well, if you have seen the 1993 movie "Shootfighter: Fight to the Death", then you have essentially also already seen the 1996 sequel "Shootfighter II", because they were one and the same movie. Yup, that was the extend of what writers Greg Mellott and Peter Shaner mustered to do here, just tweaked the setting a bit, but the storyline was basically the same.

So the writing in "Shootfighter II" was lazy, really lazy. And that makes "Shootfighter II" a somewhat dull movie experience in comparison to the 1993 original movie. Sure, "Shootfighter II" was watchable, and especially so if you haven't seen the 1993 predecessor.

"Shootfighter II" sees Bolo Yeung, William Zabka and Michael Bernardo return to reprise their characters and roles from the first movie, and that was one of the reasons why "Shootfighter II" was bearable to sit through. And this 1996 sequel also sees Brett Baxter Clark added to the roster, as well as Marc Macaulay, so there are some familiar faces on the cast list.

The movie, however, had Joe Son playing Lance Stuart, the main villain in the movie. I am not familiar with Joe Son, but talk about a miscast actor for the main bad guy. He was not able to portray a serious character, much less be taken seriously as a villain, so that took away a lot from the movie.

There were some good enough fight scenes throughout the course of the 91 minutes that the movie ran for, and they definitely helped make the movie all the more watchable, no doubt about it. And when you sit down to watch a movie such as "Shootfighter II", then it is for the martial arts and the fighting, not for the acting performances.

The 1996 movie "Shootfighter II" is nowhere near as enjoyable as the 1993 movie, especially not if you have seen the 1993 movie. And I did watch them back to back.

My rating of "Shootfighter II" lands on a mediocre five out of ten stars.

After seeing Shootfighter 1, and the buckets of blood they shed, I was ready for another rousing jaunt of open handed heart massage, and chiropractics in a cage. But nooooooo, this was like the Barney version of the first movie, with that lamer from the Karate kid. At least Bolo Yeung still kicks booty, although he needs to do more movies like Bloodsport and Caddyshack.

Ok. No law states that anyone appearing in a Martial Arts flick, must be endowed with copious amounts of acting talent. Most of those who appreciate these films, watch for the fight sequences, and how well they are done. I, myself, love a great actioner. The storyline with Bolo Yeung, and characters "Ruben" and "Nick", is easy enough to digest. As I mentioned, this is not Shakespeare. Yet, this "movie" has no excitement, whatsoever. The actors try, but the fighting sequences were as exciting as watching dust settle on a lampshade.

This, plus ho-hum production values, equals one movie that could replace SLEEP-EZE as America's main relief from insomnia.

A bad bad movie... terrible plot, hinges on Bolo Yeung's charater, but he speaks maybe 20 words in the entire movie and only has one fight scene - still in great shape considering he was also in the kung fu classic "Enter The Dragon" Interesting to see William Zabka ("Johnny" from The Karate Kid) in another martial-arts role.