IMDb RATING
4.5/10
1.4K
YOUR RATING
In 1974, an unhinged CIA agent injects himself with the werewolf blood he found. After a killing spree, his body is put in suspended animation, then thawed out 20 years later by his crazy bo... Read allIn 1974, an unhinged CIA agent injects himself with the werewolf blood he found. After a killing spree, his body is put in suspended animation, then thawed out 20 years later by his crazy boss and a team of unsuspecting doctors.In 1974, an unhinged CIA agent injects himself with the werewolf blood he found. After a killing spree, his body is put in suspended animation, then thawed out 20 years later by his crazy boss and a team of unsuspecting doctors.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Tom Hillmann
- Agent Berger
- (as Thomas Hillman)
David Michael Mullins
- Technician
- (as David M. Mullins)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
There's no such thing as an idea for a horror film that's too ridiculous to work, but I don't think it's unreasonable to argue that the more complicated the concept - the more ideas that are layered on top of one another - the harder the road to success. Take 'Project: Metalbeast,' for example. Filmmaker Alessandro De Gaetano and co-writers Timothy E. Sabo and Roger Steinmann tossed together werewolves, military experiments with werewolves, corrupt government programs and officials, and not least, synthetic metal skin. Oh my. None of this means that success was impossible, but it does mean that one has to stretch the limits of their imagination and suspension of disbelief to accept what the movie is putting down. When one further considers how lax this tends to be in its tone and pacing, leading to a paucity of major goings-on, well, one's attention begins to wander.
It's not like this is abjectly awful. Everyone put in an earnest effort, and between the cast and the crew everyone made fair contributions. The acting is fine, the sets are fine, and the costume design, hair, and makeup are fine, if a little too overt. The stunts and effects are fine. I'm more concerned about the unconvincing dialogue, the halfhearted characters, and the lethargic scene writing. The plot doesn't go very far at all for the preponderance of the first hour, and all that's left for the last third is for the carnage to ensue (less than you'd think, honestly) and for the threads to be wrapped up in the manner in which we know they will be. The direction feels less than fully engaged, and for as relatively little action as there is in ninety minutes, the result feels like a bit of a slog. No, 'Project: Metalbeast' isn't fully bad, but there's just so little here to keep us invested that the picture falls quite flat.
Yawn. There are some recognizable names and faces involved here. The last act is fine. The climax is fine. Would that there were more substance to this of any sort, or that the feature did anything to make a lasting impression. As it is the viewing experience is just rather bland and dull, even in the moments of the most violence or would-be disturbing imagery, and it stops only a little bit shy of being sleep-inducing. Sure, there are worst things one could find themselves checking out, but the simple truth of the matter is that there's just no real reason to watch this flick. I suppose if one is extremely curious or bored, and open to all the wide possibilities of cinema, then one could claim sufficient impetus to press "play," but otherwise one's time is surely better spent elsewhere. 'Project: Metalbeast' was just kind of dead on arrival.
It's not like this is abjectly awful. Everyone put in an earnest effort, and between the cast and the crew everyone made fair contributions. The acting is fine, the sets are fine, and the costume design, hair, and makeup are fine, if a little too overt. The stunts and effects are fine. I'm more concerned about the unconvincing dialogue, the halfhearted characters, and the lethargic scene writing. The plot doesn't go very far at all for the preponderance of the first hour, and all that's left for the last third is for the carnage to ensue (less than you'd think, honestly) and for the threads to be wrapped up in the manner in which we know they will be. The direction feels less than fully engaged, and for as relatively little action as there is in ninety minutes, the result feels like a bit of a slog. No, 'Project: Metalbeast' isn't fully bad, but there's just so little here to keep us invested that the picture falls quite flat.
Yawn. There are some recognizable names and faces involved here. The last act is fine. The climax is fine. Would that there were more substance to this of any sort, or that the feature did anything to make a lasting impression. As it is the viewing experience is just rather bland and dull, even in the moments of the most violence or would-be disturbing imagery, and it stops only a little bit shy of being sleep-inducing. Sure, there are worst things one could find themselves checking out, but the simple truth of the matter is that there's just no real reason to watch this flick. I suppose if one is extremely curious or bored, and open to all the wide possibilities of cinema, then one could claim sufficient impetus to press "play," but otherwise one's time is surely better spent elsewhere. 'Project: Metalbeast' was just kind of dead on arrival.
After finding, killing and extracting a blood sample from a werewolf in Europe, a soldier injects himself with it's DNA, turning himself into a werewolf in an American military base, where he's captured and cryogenically frozen. Flash foreword 10 years, where scientists are given the man's body for an experiment involving a metal-based, organic, self-restoring skin. Upon giving the soldier the skin graph, he awakens and turns into a werewolf, but this time faster, meaner, shinier and bullet proof. I picked this movie up the other day from my local video store for $2, as they are going out of business and need to sell all their videos. I grabbed as many as I could carry home, "Project: Metalbeast" being one of them. Despite the terrible title and having heard nothing of it before, "Metalbeast" turned out to be an okay way to kill 90 minutes in my book. It's got a script that's more intelligent than your usual straight-to-video horror flick, a decent score, some likable characters, a couple of gory bits (the highlight being the death of the creature at the end), and even John Carl Buechler's creature effects weren't bad, though the Metalbeast itself looks more like a Hedgehog on crack than a werewolf. Granted, the film never steps very far out of genre territory, and the portrayal of both the scientists and the military are as clichéd as can be but in the end, "Project: Metalbeast" offered a fine dose of gore, monster action, and a interesting concept that puts a nice spin on the werewolf myth.
$2 well spent, I say.
6/10.
$2 well spent, I say.
6/10.
Despite my love for all things horror, I had never actually heard about it. I managed to track down the movie, as I found out that Kane Hodder was in the movie, and thus I had to get to watch it, given his iconic horror status.
Sure, I had no idea what I was in for here, aside from what I could discern from the synopsis, and thus only knew it was a werewolf movie of sorts. But I had zero expectations to the movie as I sat down to watch it for the first time here in 2025, and thus director Alessandro De Gaetano had every opportunity to entertain and impress me.
Writers Alessandro De Gaetano, Timothy E. Sabo and Roger Steinmann put together an okay script. I mean, it was watchable, but nothing extraordinary. The pacing of the narrative, however, was a bit slow paced and the interesting events in the narrative were few and far between one another.
I was surprised to see that the movie was starring Barry Bostwick, so there was a familiar face on the cast list, aside from Kane Hodder. The acting performances in the movie were fair.
The effects in the movie were quite good for a movie such as this, and definitely added to the overall enjoyment of the movie.
My rating of "Project: Metalbeast" lands on a generous four out of ten stars.
Sure, I had no idea what I was in for here, aside from what I could discern from the synopsis, and thus only knew it was a werewolf movie of sorts. But I had zero expectations to the movie as I sat down to watch it for the first time here in 2025, and thus director Alessandro De Gaetano had every opportunity to entertain and impress me.
Writers Alessandro De Gaetano, Timothy E. Sabo and Roger Steinmann put together an okay script. I mean, it was watchable, but nothing extraordinary. The pacing of the narrative, however, was a bit slow paced and the interesting events in the narrative were few and far between one another.
I was surprised to see that the movie was starring Barry Bostwick, so there was a familiar face on the cast list, aside from Kane Hodder. The acting performances in the movie were fair.
The effects in the movie were quite good for a movie such as this, and definitely added to the overall enjoyment of the movie.
My rating of "Project: Metalbeast" lands on a generous four out of ten stars.
I RENTED this movie and i thought it would be a waste of time like these unheard of low budget movies usually are ,but i was little surprised to see that it was actually pretty good(not great or anything but pretty good for a low budget film) so if you like werewolf movies like i do and your lying in bed bored go ahead and rent it(if you like werewolf movies).my wife hated it of course but for the true horror fan it's not a complete waste of time.out of four stars for a low budget movie i give it ** stars
In 1974, two American agents are sent to Hungary by his superior Miller (Barry Bostwick) to get werewolf blood for a secret project for the creation of an invincible warrior. One of the men dies and the other decides to inject the blood in himself, being killed by Miller. There is a shutdown of the secret project. Twenty years later, the scientist Anne de Carlo (Kim Delaney) is carrying out a research of mettalic skin to replace burned ones under the command of Miller, and the body of the dead agent is delivered for the experiment. The agent is transformed in a kind of killing metallic werewolf.
"Project: Metalbeast" is a low-budget movie, with a screenplay wirhout originality. I do not know how many films I have seen with similar storyline. The villain performed by Barry Bostwick is the best this movie can offer. My vote is four.
Title (Brazil): "Metalbeast"
Note: On 07 June 2024, I saw this film again.
"Project: Metalbeast" is a low-budget movie, with a screenplay wirhout originality. I do not know how many films I have seen with similar storyline. The villain performed by Barry Bostwick is the best this movie can offer. My vote is four.
Title (Brazil): "Metalbeast"
Note: On 07 June 2024, I saw this film again.
Did you know
- TriviaThe pinball machine seen in the rec room is 'Rack 'Em Up!' and was first made by Gottlieb in 1983.
- GoofsAfter Miller arrives at the lab Dr. Carlo refers to him as Colonel while discussing his sudden take over of operational authority of her project with Hammond (who holds the rank of Brigadier General). Military hierarchy would never allow a Colonel to take operational authority away from a higher ranking officer like Hammond.
- How long is Project: Metalbeast?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Project: Metalbeast
- Filming locations
- USA(Location)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h 32m(92 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content