Between the Lines

To my mind, this show, now 15 years old (well, nearly) is an excellent portrayal of the progress, or not, of its main character.

Well placed, and pushing all the right buttons, he was promoted but with a qualifier:- do this s$$t job and... so he was transferred into a job he didn't request, nor did he care for in any way, shape or form.

But, he was told, if do this you will get what you really want:- all in the fullness of time. This, over the course of the first season, proved to be BS. Luckily, or unluckily, he was blessed with a good team. He was interested in doing a good job and thought, wrongly, that it was a means to an end. Wrong, indeed. If he had not had a strong team, or if he had not been motivated to do a good job, for the job's sake, he would not have found himself in the situations revealed in Seasons Two and Three.

Without wishing to prolong the agony here, the three seasons are an excellent demonstration of a downward spiral of a police officer's career attributable largely to external forces, coupled with his own inability to cope with these forces.

Been there done that, bought the Tee shirt.

And where do I buy the DVDs ??

When it grows up Line Of Duty would like to be Between The Lines.

I like Line Of Duty but Between The Lines was more realistic I think.

Daily Mail readers might be critical of Between The Lines but when you consider Hillsborough and the Miner's strike the corrupt police in league with the establishment while protecting themselves the plots in the series seem realistic.

It is April 2021 and the news reports a met cop charged with being a fascist you think Line Of Duty should be set in London.

But enough reality this is a well acted drama with usually great scripts and a big budget for its time.

Like all these older productions the supporting cast is interesting.

There is a Daniel Craig in this,whatever happened to him?

People slag off series 3 but I like it but it is not as good as the first 2 series.

Investigating corruption is a police matter. But what happens when the corruption comes from inside?

When those entrusted with keeping law and order are those who break the vital code of conduct?

Between the Lines is a powerful and controversial drama which tackled the touchy subject of the police investigating themselves.

Created by John Wilsher and produced by Tony Garnett, the man behind the controversial 1970s series Law and Order, the drama is a tough and uncompromising analysis of that dilemma.

Neil Pearson, perhaps best known for his role as womanising reporter Dave in Drop The Dead Donkey, took the lead role as Det Supt Tony Clark, ambitious head of Mulberry Street police station, who is asked to launch an investigation into his own men.

Recruited by the Complaints Investigations Bureau, he soon finds himself in the uncomfortable and loathesome situation of infiltrating his own station.

The first two series were superb, with great support from Tom Georgeson, Siobhan Redmond and the late Tony Doyle of Ballykissangel fame.

However, by the time a third run was commissioned, Garnett went against his better judgement and obliged with a lacklustre end to the saga.

It was a mistake he wouldn't repeat a few years later for his outstanding series This Life.

I have watched every episode at least twice over the past 5 years (we got this series a little later than the UK of course). It's realistic cut throat, no holds barred depiction of UK police corruption was leading edge. Presented in the UK at a time when confidence in the UK police was at a record low, this show encapsulated the feelings of the day. It is very well acted, the principals gelling nicely right from the first episode. The third series is less tight and focussed, which explains why the main cast members refused to sign up for a 4th series. Neil Pearson (one of the sexiest men on the screen these days) is extremely convincing as Tony Clark. In fact, I can't think of any weak performances at all. great writing too. certainly a "10"

It seems unlikely anyone would be able to make a series like this in today's television climate, given the preference today for light drama with happy endings, which this series eschewed almost constantly, almost masochistically so. Yet no series made since this one ever felt as real and believable as this did. The second series moved away from police complaints to the increasing involvement of MI5 and managed to be even better. Certainly the portrayal of Box 500 here seemed much more real and convincing than "Spooks". Indeed this is the series that "Spooks" wishes it was and the plot lines featured were much more gripping and believable than "Spooks" managed without having to resort to our heroes saving London and/or the world every week. Even the maligned third series, where Clark, Naylor and Connell go private, is still better than most dramas today. The producers had the good sense to call it a day after the third series and at least every episode ever made is preserved for posterity on DVD to be savoured again and again. When will something of the quality of this series ever get made again? Not for a long time, if ever, I fear.