[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
Back
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro
Danger Mutations (1991)

User reviews

Danger Mutations

14 reviews
5/10

A second serving of cheesy terror.

Picking up from where the original left off (and it does go on to clear up loose ends) we see Andrew Steven's character David wandering through the desert heading for another underground scientific base that his team was originally in contact with in the first film. On the way there, he also picks up a lady survivor where they would become more than acquaintances with her soon expecting. Those survivors at the base are waiting on David, who holds a vaccine for the spreading virus, but what awaits them when David and the girl get there is hideous mutations.

Roger Corman would also produce the sequel (that looks just as cheap) that came two years later with star Andrew Steven (who here had me thinking of him as a poor man's Kurt Russell) not only acting, but directing and also penning the material in another quite low-budgeted, muggy B-grade offering. Tick off; Mushy make-up effects, lousy props, a tad of nudity, clunky dialogues, junky set designs and gratuitously raw violence. At times it reminded me of the Corman produced alien clone --- "Forbidden World". Surprisingly I see this film cop a lot criticism when compared to the first, as I don't see it to be any worse. Sure I wouldn't call it a perfect movie, but in certain regards I enjoyed this follow-up more than the original film. On this occasion it tries to be slightly different in its ideas and execution, but still sharing similarities but consisting of more excitement. It does go on to rehash certain moments in the latter stages. However there seems to be a little more happening story wise (when focusing on Steven's character in the desert or that of a mutating finger from a gargoyle) and its quick tempo makes sure it doesn't wear out its welcome. Steven's practical handling startlingly generates energy and a bit of tension amongst the monster gruel. He's not as confined, but goes for more expansion despite the obvious limitations but these murky visuals/lighting makes for some much needed atmospherics. The cast are all committed with ever reliable R Lee Emery's commanding presence heading the way. Andrew Stevens (sporting a fashionable beard) is sturdy enough in the heroine role, Burton Gilliam is particularly amusing, Chick Vennera is fitting and Stella Stevens (yes that's Andrew's mother) is agreeably good too. What's this type of film without beautiful ladies; in the shape of knockouts Barbara Alyn Woods, Renée Jones and Clare Hoak.
  • lost-in-limbo
  • Nov 21, 2009
  • Permalink
5/10

The Terror Within II

Andrew Stevens returns as David to the sequel, but this time he also acts as writer and director. Gargoyles are still roaming around the world and people are also still living in secret bases. David along with his dog Butch is out collecting raw materials so they can create a vaccination to battle the germ that has been accidentally let loose on the human race. David is colder and more desperate this time around. This time around I found it was PREDATOR that was being ripped off, but not to the degree ALIEN was in the original.

In addition it seems this sequel gets a lot of criticism as being a bad film, but personally I didn't find it any worse than the original. In fact I found it more original with its story. The music by. Terry Plumeri was good even though at times it seemed quite similar to Alan Silverstri's score to PREDATOR. If you really liked the original give this one a try if you want. If you didn't like the original I would just say skip this one. Also starring Andrew's mother Stella Stevens, R. Lee Ermey and Renee Jones. Executive producer was the king of B movies Roger Corman.
  • ryan-10075
  • May 12, 2021
  • Permalink
4/10

...says the mutated monster: "hey, pull my finger!"

Although widely considered as one of the lousiest (of many) earthbound- "Alien" knockoffs of the late 80s, I personally always had a weakness for "The Terror Within". This shameless imitation - produced by the equally shameless Roger Corman - featured non-stop gore, cheesy monster effects, and dumb but hilarious plot errors.

And you know what? I didn't expect anything less (or more?) from its rapidly put together sequel! R. Lee Ermey replaces George Kennedy, but other than that "The Terror Within II" is almost an exact replica of part one. A handful of last survivors are still hiding out in a subterranean laboratory, mutant creatures still dwell the earth's post-apocalyptic surface on the lookout of women to impregnate, and if the creatures don't wipe out the survivors some sort of random deadly virus will. Heck, even the idiotic dog-whistles remained in place as one of the sole effective weapons to battle the mutants. The only innovative aspect here is that a mutant's ripped off finger (!) slowly metamorphoses into a puddle of prowling blob/goo that attacks from inside the safe lair!

Well yes, this film is quite bad, but also thoroughly enjoyable. For some inexplicable reason (let's call it B-movie logic) only gorgeous women survived the apocalypse, and they're also eager to strip topless. Andrew Stevens, the lead hero of the original, promoted himself to also being the writer and director of the sequel, so the first idea he put in the script was that a gorgeous blond girl (Clare Hoak) falls in love with his character and immediately offers her body to him. Nicely done, Andrew!
  • Coventry
  • Jul 16, 2023
  • Permalink

Entertaining Monster Movie

The Terror Within II (1991)

** (out of 4)

Andrew Stevens co-wrote, directed and stars as David in this sequel to the 1989 cult film. This time out, there aren't too many humans who survived a nuclear fallout, which resulted in a number of mutants running the land. David meets up with a woman and soon team up with a colony to try and defeat the mutants once and for all.

THE TERROR WITHIN was one of the better low-budget ALIEN clones as it featured a terrific monster, a nice cast and some great gore effects. This sequel was obviously working with an even smaller budget but if you're a fan of this type of post apocalyptic film then there's plenty to enjoy here. There's no question that it falls well short of the original movie but there's still enough "B" movie fun here to make it worth watching.

I've always been a fan of Stevens so it was fun getting to see him play the tough action hero. When we first meet his character he's walking around with a full beard and playing with his lovable dog. From here he is given a love interest and it's pretty much all war from here. Stevens was certainly a lot of fun in the lead role but we also got nice support from the likes of R. Lee Ermey, Chick Vennera, Stella Stevens and Clare Hoak. Granted, these aren't Oscar-worthy performances but that's not what this film called for.

The action scenes are well-directed for the most part and Stevens manages to keep the film moving at a nice pace. Add in a little bit of nudity, some sex scenes and you've got the type of R-rated movie people would have wanted to rent back in the day. The creature effects aren't nearly as effective as the first movie but I did like the look of them here. There's also some nice blood and guts scattered throughout the film.

With all of that said, THE TERROR WITHIN II features a pretty basic and unoriginal story and there's certainly not enough tension to make it a complete success but it's an entertaining B movie.
  • Michael_Elliott
  • Oct 28, 2017
  • Permalink
2/10

Mind numbing

The oohgaa freaking horn is annoying as hell right when the movie starts and just keeps getting worse as the thing goes on !!
  • andersondoug
  • Dec 28, 2020
  • Permalink
5/10

"He must have gotten that from your side of the family."

Andrew Stevens, co-star of the first film, boosts himself to the starring role in this very routine sci-fi / horror sequel. He also wrote the script and made his directing debut here, as his character David is out in the apocalyptic wilderness collecting ingredients for a vaccine. He hooks up with a lovely young lady, Ariel (Clare Hoak, "Cool World") who was traveling with her brother before they were set upon by the mutant monsters that plague this future world. They then need to double-time it back to the lab where Davids' colleagues are hard at work.

"The Terror Within II" is another of those low-budget genre flicks (this one made for Roger Cormans' post-New World company Concorde) that this viewer doesn't consider "bad" so much as simply pretty average. Much about it is familiar, especially that final quarter which turns into yet another imitation of "Alien" and "Aliens". That said, the monster is pretty cool (Stevens holds to monster movie convention by taking his sweet time in properly revealing it), there's plenty of gore, Stevens does his best working within the confines of limited funding, and there are two key talents that help make this watchable: composer Terry Plumeri ("Body Chemistry") and future Spielberg collaborator, cinematographer Janusz Kaminski ("Saving Private Ryan"). Kaminski started out his career working on a lot of these Concorde pictures, and it's clear he was destined for great things.

The cast is good and certainly above average, with Stevens' mother Stella ("The Nutty Professor") in a major supporting role. R. Lee Ermey ("Full Metal Jacket") once again effortlessly projects authority, although he later admitted that he just did this picture for the paycheck (to help pay for a house). Co-starring are Chick Vennera ("McBain"), Burton Gilliam ("Blazing Saddles"), Renee Jones ("Jason Lives: Friday the 13th Part VI"), Barbara Alyn Woods ('One Tree Hill', 'Chucky'), and Gordon Currie ("Puppet Master" 4 and 5).

In general, this is not one of those movies one should go out of their way to see, but it wasn't a real waste of time, either, not for this viewer.

Five out of 10.
  • Hey_Sweden
  • Oct 15, 2022
  • Permalink
3/10

At least Andrew got his mom some work

  • BandSAboutMovies
  • Sep 28, 2019
  • Permalink
1/10

STINKS JUST LIKE PART ONE!!

Wow! The second one is just as stinky as the first entry. I really hope we don't see a third part. I caught this one on late night cable. I didn't really want to watch, but I didn't feel like watching infomercials about back hair removal. Although it may have been more appealing in the long run. Man it's sad that film had to be wasted twice on the Terror Within and Terror Within 2. Our government wants to root out evil, HEY, how about going after these film makers next!! Wake up and smell the coffee. These films SUCK BAD!! The acting, if you can call it that, is really horrible. Matter of fact it's scarier than the stupid mutant. I know people who make movies say that those who can't do, become critics...I know first hand. I made my own rotten horror film in the 1980's. It sucked as well. But not as bad as this!! Be smart. Pass this crap up! I would give it a big fat ZERO!! But 1 was the lowest. So a 1 it is!
  • rabid_dingoes
  • Feb 11, 2003
  • Permalink
3/10

More like the terror on the screen...

Granted that I haven't watched the first "The Terror Within" movie, or at least don't have any recollection of watching it, should I have watched it during my teenage years. But regardless, I was intrigued by the synopsis of the movie, and decided to take a chance on it despite it being from 1991.

I should have gone with my gut instinct and stayed clear of this one. I managed to endure 35 minutes of this movie, before I gave up out of complete and utter boredom and a lack of interest in anything that happened on the screen.

This was low budget in every sense of the meaning low budget. The creature design was just abysmal, and most of the time you didn't see anything more than a poorly constructed oversized hand made out of questionable material. And the guns that people fired had no fire spray at the muzzle, and didn't even leave holes in walls when being shot through thin sheets of plastic. It was just atrocious to bear witness to.

The cast in "The Terror Within II" was relatively unknown to me, aside from R. Lee Ermey. Now that really puzzled me. How did they actually get him to participate in a movie such as this?

From what I managed to witness during my 35 minutes of watching this ordeal of a movie, I suppose the storyline was about mankind struggling to survive in a harsh and barren world overrun with mutants. Now, it was that same synopsis that had me lured in, because it sounded very much like something akin to the Fallout games. It might have been so in theory, but turned out to be a much less effective thing on the screen.

I have no intention of returning to finish watching this movie, and I also have no intention of going to sit down to watch the first movie. It just doesn't seem to be worth the time nor the effort.
  • paul_m_haakonsen
  • Jun 19, 2017
  • Permalink
6/10

Stevens makes a competent directorial debut

THE TERROR WITHIN survivor David (Andrew Stevens) travels the post- epidemic wasteland with his dog Butch (Butch Stevens, no, really!) trying to get to an underground facility filled with more scientists in Denver. This proves treacherous thanks to the genetically abnormal Lucius creatures roaming the hills. THE TERROR WITHIN was a decent little late 80s Concorde flick and producer Roger Corman wisely let star Stevens make his writing-directing debut here. How good is Stevens? He brings back his freakin' dog while part one's female survivor is toast and written off in a line of dialog ("She died in the desert"). Even though this is essentially a remake of the first film, Stevens shows he is adept at handling the action and nudity (something that would come in handy in his T&A thriller work a few years later). He even gets his mom Stella in there alongside fine supporting work from R. Lee Ermey, Chick Vennera and Burton Gilliam. The effects are appropriately gooey and there is a really bizarre monster rape scene (initiated by Cyndi James Gossett, spouse of Louis at the time). Stevens brought Butch back in NIGHT EYES II the following year.
  • udar55
  • Nov 21, 2009
  • Permalink
1/10

What in the plagiarized cheap ripoff hell did I just watch?

If reviews could rate movies in negative numbers, this mind-numbing heap of fetid fecal tomfoolery would rate a Minus-10. At least some of the post-"Alien" clones had some kind of interesting twist; this abomination has the Gaul to try and add some "Hills Have Eyes" and "Road Warrior" riffs before going full high school drama club dropouts with an 8mm movie camera ketchup-covered "monster" effects "Alien" ripoff - all done so incredibly poorly that it astounds my senses to see otherwise-talented actors involved. I hope their checks didn't bounce, because there is no way this turd of a movie could ever be used to advance a career or be used as an "acting legacy" item. Burton Gilliam had no comment on this movie when were together for an event a few years ago; now i understand why. Andrew Stevens is a nice guy and a decent actor, but any acting or directing talent was not apparent on this bomb...and he talked his mother into being in it too! I hope she forgave him.

In case you haven't picked up on it yet, I highly advise anyone to avoid this gawdawful production. You would be better advised to watch back-to-back showings of "Plan Nine From Outer Space" for a week while sitting on a bed of hot coals. I appreciate "B movies", for their low-budget amateur efforts; hell, I even like Cash Flagg's "The Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living And Became Mixed Up Zombies" (especially the Mystery Science Theater 3000 version), but THIS atrocity should have all the copies and negatives burned, buried in salted sand, and everyone involved should erase it from their resumes.
  • doppleganger19692
  • Mar 15, 2024
  • Permalink
8/10

Nifty little Grade B sci-fi/horror creature feature

  • Woodyanders
  • Jun 26, 2018
  • Permalink
6/10

not as good as the first but still ok

this film is not as good as the first but hey it still somehow works although the speed is slow and the makeup is laughable but still it is ok to watch on a boring sunday afternoon but it will not give you the Alien feel of the first one.
  • farhan_jia
  • Mar 18, 2002
  • Permalink

Fine horror sequel

My review was written in May 1992 after watching the movie on Vestron video cassette.

Andrew Stevens makes a creditable feature helming debut with this follow-up to the sci-fier he starred in. Released theatrically last year, pic's currently in video stores.

Pic notably has Stevens direcign his mother, Stella Stevens, who made her own directing debut in 1989 with "The Ranch" starring Andrew.

Well-plotted with a script by Stevens and Lee Lankford, "Terror Within II" limns Stevens' adventures following a biological war that has wiped out nearly all of humanity. He's en route to the underground Rocky Mountain labh manned by R. Lee Ermey and a co-ed crew.

Accompanied by his trusty dog, he fights off mutants and other foes, and rescues lovely damsel Clare Hoak. Back at the labe, Ermey and medical officer Stella Stevens have to deal with a monster on the loose.

Subplots include a mutant raping Hoak, giving rise to a monster baby, and a mutant's severed finger growing in the labe into a grotesque blob-style monster. Stevens' direction keeps the pic chugging along well.

Cast is fine, with maximum pulchritude provided by Hoak and Barbara Alyn Woods. Monster makeup and gore is low-budget but effective.
  • lor_
  • Jul 11, 2023
  • Permalink

More from this title

More to explore

Recently viewed

Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
Get the IMDb App
Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
Follow IMDb on social
Get the IMDb App
For Android and iOS
Get the IMDb App
  • Help
  • Site Index
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • License IMDb Data
  • Press Room
  • Advertising
  • Jobs
  • Conditions of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, an Amazon company

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.