[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsPride MonthAmerican Black Film FestivalSummer Watch GuideSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

The Unnamable II: The Statement of Randolph Carter

  • 1992
  • R
  • 1h 44m
IMDb RATING
5.1/10
1.3K
YOUR RATING
The Unnamable II: The Statement of Randolph Carter (1992)
Horror

A creature of demonic nature, too hideous to have a name, once again terrorizes the college kids that summoned it.A creature of demonic nature, too hideous to have a name, once again terrorizes the college kids that summoned it.A creature of demonic nature, too hideous to have a name, once again terrorizes the college kids that summoned it.

  • Director
    • Jean-Paul Ouellette
  • Writers
    • H.P. Lovecraft
    • Jean-Paul Ouellette
  • Stars
    • Mark Kinsey Stephenson
    • Charles Klausmeyer
    • Maria Ford
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    5.1/10
    1.3K
    YOUR RATING
    • Director
      • Jean-Paul Ouellette
    • Writers
      • H.P. Lovecraft
      • Jean-Paul Ouellette
    • Stars
      • Mark Kinsey Stephenson
      • Charles Klausmeyer
      • Maria Ford
    • 25User reviews
    • 20Critic reviews
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • Photos13

    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    + 7
    View Poster

    Top cast24

    Edit
    Mark Kinsey Stephenson
    • Randolph Carter
    Charles Klausmeyer
    • Eliot Damon Howard
    Maria Ford
    Maria Ford
    • Alyda Winthrop
    John Rhys-Davies
    John Rhys-Davies
    • Professor Warren
    Julie Strain
    Julie Strain
    • Creature
    Peter Breck
    Peter Breck
    • Sheriff Hatch
    David Warner
    David Warner
    • Chancellor Thayer
    Shawn T. Lim
    • Robert Barger
    Siobhan McCafferty
    • Off. Debbie Lesh
    Richard Domeier
    Richard Domeier
    • Off. Malcolm Bainbridge
    Brad Blaisdell
    Brad Blaisdell
    • Off. Ben Lesh
    Kevin Alber
    • Jack Herman
    August James
    • Mary Wilkinson
    • (as August West)
    Kit Fredericks
    • The Unnamable
    Bryan Clark
    • Prof. Thurber
    Mike Gordon
    • Joshua Winthrop
    • (as Captain Mike Gordon)
    Chuck Butto
    • Off. Joe Choate
    Harper Roisman
    • Doc Evans
    • Director
      • Jean-Paul Ouellette
    • Writers
      • H.P. Lovecraft
      • Jean-Paul Ouellette
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews25

    5.11.2K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    7paul_m_haakonsen

    Compelling classic

    Classic horror movie of the early 90's. This movie is actually one of the movies that stand out in my memory back from the early 90's when I watched it for the first time on VHS. I just had to purchase it on DVD when I had the chance.

    I loved the story and found it to be thrilling and good. It drew from the Lovecraft universe in a good way, and I was nailed to my chair throughout the entire movie (and it still does whenever I put it into the DVD player).

    I have watched this movie maybe 5 or 6 times over the years, and never gotten tired of it. Of course, a certain amount of time have to pass before you put this one in the DVD player again.

    When I watched this for the first time, I was fairly unfamiliar with John Rhys-Davies, but found his acting here to be believable and good. And this movie also introduced me to Maria Ford, which I must say is a plus for this movie.

    The atmosphere of the movie is dark and brooding, which works well throughout the entire feature. Of course the effects are sort of bad in today's standards, but back then they were great. Especially for a fairly low budget movie. I liked the make-up on the creature, and were surprised to find out that it was Julie Strain underneath it.

    If you like the work of Lovecraft and have a taste for the movies based on Lovecraft's work, then you should not let this movie pass you by. Even today, this movie is worth watching. Even though Jeffrey Combs is not in this Lovecraft-based movie, it is still providing good entertainment. It has a good, solid story, no real boring moments throughout the length of the movie, and I think it is a must have in any horror fan's DVD collection.
    8mlevans

    A pretty solid sequel

    I accidentally rented Unnamable II tonight, thinking I was renting the original for the first time in a few years. (The original was one of my favorite Gothic horror films.) I was disappointed that I had grabbed the wrong movie, but still enjoyed seeing this one.

    With the possible exception of The Godfather II, sequels never match the originals & this one is no exception. Still, Oulette does a good job in leading us through this dash through campus, with the hideous she-demon behind us. The idea of the split demon-normal girl is intriguing and the lovely Maria Ford is convincing as the 300-year-old coed. Mark Kinsey Stephenson is again solid as the scholarly and fearless Randolph Carter. (Doesn't every college English Department have a senior bookworm like this?)

    My only complaint-and this is one I might not have even thought of before returning to grad school-is that the professors are all Scooby Dooish `all-knowing' doctors. Professor Warren (John Rhys-Davies) apparently is an oral folklore specialist within the English Department…unless he is possibly in sociology or some similar field. For him to have a passing knowledge of quantum physics is not unthinkable. For him to look at a mutilated body and tell claw marks from incisor marks is stretching it considerably. For a literature professor to be running around with a portable microbiology lab in his little black pouch, though, and setting up a microscope, etc., in a dank, dark cave and making glib pronouncements about the blood, however, is akin to no one suspecting `Old Hank' or whoever as being the Scooby Doo villain. Folks, as one who is around professors every day (and who hopes to BE a college history professor in a couple of years,) I can attest that the average English or history professor barely understands how to connect to the Internet or operate PowerPoint, let alone set up a mini-science lab in a dark cave in five minutes!

    This one is okay, but I need to see the original again. Part of the reason I wanted to see the original tonight was so I COULD do an updated review. But that will come. People aren't exactly standing in line to do these two movies. Still, this one is definitely worth watching. Give it a chance!
    3sales-417

    Failed as a horror, but works as a comedy

    I wanted to see what was out there for Lovecraft stuff to get in the mood for Halloween and came up with this movie. An absolutely stupid choice of lead actor combined with a really bad script makes the whole thing kind of "Killer Tomatoes" cool.

    This kind of thing happens in the story: They go into some underground tunnels beneath a graveyard with no plan, no guns, no secret charm, just Don Knotts and Mr. French going to see if the monster that killed 4 people last night is still there. They find this crazed demon-infested girl and reach near it's hugely-fanged face to pull out a hair to study. Just one dumb idea after another.

    My favorite part? Check out the sound it makes when the deputies are shooting the lock at the end.

    I didn't see the first movie, but I don't think I needed it to review this.
    5TdSmth5

    A wasted opportunity

    Not sure if I missed this movie back in the 90s or if it wasn't memorable. But here I am in 2014 watching a 90s movie that looks more like an 80s movie.

    Something happened in a house. Bodies are being dragged away. A guy named Howard survived and now he has visions of a creature. A guy named Carter was standing nearby so he's a witness. But he investigates into the house and discovers a scary past, involving the Necronomicon. He enlists another professor and of they go into a cave beneath the house. Howard is also with them but he stays outside.

    Inside the cave they find a creature, that's a pairing of a woman--the daughter of the former house owner--and a demon. They manage to separate the two. Carter takes the girl with him to the university. The scholar stays behind researching the demon, which ends up killing him. But the girl feels that the demon is going to come after her. And sure enough the demon appears and Carter, the girl, some friends, the cops all have to face the demon.

    This movie can be credited with one achievement, a very questionable one though: it stars Maria Ford and Julie Strain in 1992 and yet shows no nudity. Ford is not wearing clothes for a good part of the movie, but a huge wig covers up her body. It would have been even a greater annoyance in the 90s when the two ladies where in their soft-core heyday.

    Aside from that major weakness, the movie is of course slow, 15 minutes longer than it needs to be. It feature some good acting and some poor acting. It has good physical gore and prosthetic effects, and some cheesy visual effects. The story is alright but more could have been made of it. And of course a lot more could have been done with such a cast.
    7udar55

    I enjoyed this more than the first one

    This might be the only Lovecraft movie sequel to actually adapt a Lovecraft story ("The Statement of Randolph Carter," which actually preceded "The Unnamable") and is a superior sequel. Well, I think it is superior since I can't remember liking THE UNNAMABLE that much (outside of some nice make-up). Stephenson is an unusual lead, a very intense nerd totally focused on his task at hand. Klausmeyer, who inexplicably sees his character renamed from Howard Damon to Eliot Damon Howard, is good as well. Completely underutilized David Warner slipped in for one day to shoot a scene as the college chancellor and Rhys-Davies might have been there for a couple of days. The film offers lots of gore and, again, the creature design is pretty damn spiffy. The real star, however, is b-movie actress Maria Ford. This might actually be her strongest acting role as the displaced 17th century girl (and I'm not saying that because she spends 50% of her screen time nude). Sadly, I decided to look her up online and she has had some horrific plastic surgery in the ensuing years.

    More like this

    The Unnamable
    4.8
    The Unnamable
    Le tueur de Malibu
    5.2
    Le tueur de Malibu
    La secte
    6.0
    La secte
    Pumpkinhead II : Les Ailes du sang
    4.6
    Pumpkinhead II : Les Ailes du sang
    Le cri des ténèbres
    5.1
    Le cri des ténèbres
    Le Corps et le Fouet
    6.6
    Le Corps et le Fouet
    La reine des vampires
    5.4
    La reine des vampires
    Ton vice est une chambre close dont moi seul ai la clé
    6.6
    Ton vice est une chambre close dont moi seul ai la clé
    Spectre
    4.7
    Spectre
    Amityville 4
    4.4
    Amityville 4
    Black Room
    4.9
    Black Room
    Random Acts of Violence
    5.2
    Random Acts of Violence

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Trivia
      Shot in five weeks.
    • Connections
      Featured in Joe Bob's Drive-In Theater: Fit to Kill & The Unnamable II (1994)

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    FAQ16

    • How long is The Unnamable II: The Statement of Randolph Carter?Powered by Alexa

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • October 21, 1992 (United Kingdom)
    • Country of origin
      • United States
    • Language
      • English
    • Also known as
      • Créature des ténèbres
    • Filming locations
      • Santa Clarita Studios - 25135 Anza Drive, Santa Clarita, California, USA
    • Production companies
      • The Unnamable Productions Co.
      • Yankee Classic Pictures
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Box office

    Edit
    • Budget
      • $1,000,000 (estimated)
    See detailed box office info on IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      1 hour 44 minutes
    • Color
      • Color
    • Sound mix
      • Ultra Stereo
    • Aspect ratio
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    The Unnamable II: The Statement of Randolph Carter (1992)
    Top Gap
    By what name was The Unnamable II: The Statement of Randolph Carter (1992) officially released in India in English?
    Answer
    • See more gaps
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.