L'arme suprême

Story line - very poor

Acting - mediocre to poor

Character Development - very little

Violence - heavy

Sex & Nudity - NONE

Tough cop Traci takes on a very bad drug dude, and in the end, she's the last cop still standing, mostly because it's her arrogance and stupidity that got the others killed. The best comedy moment (not intended to be funny) is when she seriously wonders what it was that she did wrong.

I expected the overall quality of the flick to be poor, and so wasn't disappointed in that regard. However, I was expecting a certain amount of eye candy, and the best this movie provided was a girl on a bicycle wearing a thong bikini. Doesn't Traci realize that nudity is the only reason her fans put up with the other inadequacies?

Traci is actually not a bad actress, but if she really wants to go mainstream and keep her clothes on, she needs to start hanging out with a better class of writers and directors. Continuing to be in forgettable flicks like this is what she's doing wrong.

What I see is someone who is trying to buildup a reputation in the industry as legit, after coming from an industry where the mainstream population is going shun you. You have to start somewhere and I'm sure it's not going to be at the top, so for starters I'd expect to see some of the "low budget" type films. I'd say she is still young enough to make the jump to mainstream files but I'd also have to say give her 15 to 20 years to make that jump without the stigma of the past hanging on. Take a look at her biography and see the time frame where she was in the porn industry and when she got out, adding that 20 years to that date brings us pretty close to the current time. So I really think she's got a chance at this and if she makes it, it will indeed be a rarity. Who knows she could be in the next blockbuster, these days you never know. But then that's just me, I'm one of those kooks that hang around to read the credits.

Why do the cops only have handguns? They knew exactly what they were doing, they set up a huge undercover operation. Why did they go out of their way to hit parked cars not anywhere near them?

Yahphet Kotto is the only person here who can act, and he's phoning it in. Right after this he'd join Homicide Life On The Street and do basically the same character but massively better. Traci's stuntwork is so bad she looks like she's drunk or stoned, and they had to do a lot of editing to make her appear mobile.

Almost all of the dialogue sounds ADR'd, and very poorly. Almost all of the action sequences are done in slo-mo, but so poorly I wonder if the director was crazy or lazy or just had to fill the run time and was desperate. Plot feels like it was written by a 6 year old who spent a summer watching really bad action flicks. Hero says this, boss says that, nothing ever gets resolved. Actually the script feels like it was written by an angry 6 year old. Like he got bullied at school. His parents didn't believe him, and now he's bitter. There's a ton of utterly pointless scenes which is weird given they only had to fill 90 minutes of screen time. Traci actually disappears for about half an hour and I wonder if its cuz she was so messed up on drugs they had to shoot more scenes without her. At no point is it clear exactly how the villains relate to the heroes. All we know is there's cops and there's gangsters. The final action sequence is incredibly lazy and looks like it was shot on the same night on the same street as the opening action sequence. BUT we do get the overused cliche of our hero walking away from a fiery explosion and looking disinterested.

Its a horrible mess from start to finish and the worst part is its not so cheesy you can laugh at it. Its just bad. Also I keep hearing this was rated NC-17 because of the violence and I think everybody including the MPAA ratings board must have been high on peyote. There's no violence here which would justify an NC-17. I have seen loads of R movies with considerably more violence.

This is a 1993 straight-to-video stereotypical female-cop-has-to-show-her-stuff-to make-it-to-the-top movie. The action is written into the script AND it is executed...kind of. Traci Lords isn't my idea of an action star. Yes, she has done plenty of action parts, and even does a decent job as Anna in Len Wiseman's Underworld and also contributes a fair performance as Chameleon in Black Mask 2, but I never could wholly buy her as an action star. She doesn't fit the bill, and for me, her presence lessened what enjoyment there COULD be had in this endeavor. Not her performance; that is as good as she gets, but her presence.

But this is typical of the 90's. It is overdone, the performances are over the top dramatically, the dialog is trite and contrived, and the action is choreographed so that no one actually touches ANYone in the hand-to-hand scenes.

The mafia, gang, and cop stereotypical elements are too prolific to enumerate and really drag down the story, such as the story was.

There IS some enjoyment to be had, if you're into late 80's, early 90's M4TV or Str82Video Movies. Directed by Chameleon, whose last "real" movie was...wait. Oops. I can't say he has made anything worth mention. But if you like this, he also directed A Time To Die (1991), also starring Traci Lords, and not any better than this one.

This one rates a 5.6/10 on the TV/Video Scale from...

the Fiend :.

A cheap but workable B-movie thriller with Traci Lords playing a renegade cop on the trail of a drug kingpin wreaking havoc in the city. This one is packed full of violent shoot-outs and assorted mayhem, so it breezes past, and if you don't mind your films low budget then you'll find yourself enjoying it a fair bit like I did. Watch out for Yaphet Kotto's cameo and a bad guy impersonating Tony Montana.