A rich and famous writer of trash novels is shot and the killer suicides. A golden boy reporter gets the story 30 minutes later. He investigates the disturbed killer, his cute sister and ric... Read allA rich and famous writer of trash novels is shot and the killer suicides. A golden boy reporter gets the story 30 minutes later. He investigates the disturbed killer, his cute sister and rich parents for a "why".A rich and famous writer of trash novels is shot and the killer suicides. A golden boy reporter gets the story 30 minutes later. He investigates the disturbed killer, his cute sister and rich parents for a "why".
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Oh -- the big weakness. Alright. As they say, "Even paranoids have enemies." And in this case, Mulroney's beliefs about Dennis Hopper's writing a scandalous number on the family were evidently correct. Hopper was collecting secret information in the form of gossip and so forth. Stoltz is a successful reporter who begins nosing into the case and finding that, yes, maybe Mulroney was right. But where was Hopper getting his dish from? Jennifer Connelly confesses that it was she who was Hopper's informant. She seduces Stoltz and more or less coerces him into destroying all of his evidence about the case. Having succeeded in quashing the story Stoltz was pursuing, she abandons Stoltz.
The holes in the reasoning gape before us. If she wanted the true story quashed, why did she inform on the family in the first place? The question undermines the entire plot. Almost as bad: Stoltz has quit his job at the paper, and the job has been taken over by Macy. In the last scene, she taunts Macy by revealing her half-naked body to him from a soft-pornly curtained window, and Macy moves toward the building with an expression of what is presumably supposed to be deep desire. Da spider iss spinnink her wep fawh anodder unvary fly! But -- WHY? The scandalous story is now kaput. She should have no interest in Stoltz's replacement at the paper, nor he in her -- he knows practically nothing about Stoltz' work.
The performances and the moody atmosphere are enough to carry this film over the abbysal gaps in the plot, but they provide pretty shaky support.
Making his research and digging up some dirt, the reporter finds that the young man's sister (Jennifer Connelly) might be part of the issue which revolves on some family secrets.
Despite some cliches and with its one-dimensional characters of which is easily to predict their next moves, the movie manages to create a nice mystery, with several complex layers that instigates viewers though it's quite easy to figure the mystery related with the family with skeletons in the closet due to the lack of characters who could have an interest in killing the popular author.
The movie succeeds with good performances from practically everybody involved - specially with William H. Macy playing the humored mentor of Stoltz character, and there's also Vincent Price on his final film performance - but it's quite hard to relate with the cockiness coming from our heroic reporter, and I believe some viewers will probably hate him as the story progresses. Stoltz is pretty good, an actor you can depend on very easily but this character didn't suit him all that way because it's too heartless at some points. Yet he's the main reason why this movie becomes a point of curious interest since it talks about the power of media in creating stories, developing a case as things move on with twists and turns, and there's plenty of time to talk about the importance of ethics in journalism along with the investigation conducted by the reporter. Nostalgia hit really hard when his sort of like idealistic manners spoke volumes by saying that a journalist cannot print lies. In the current times of fake news and stuff, if only the media had those valid notions like he tries to infuse.
For a mystery story, the film works quite well but the surprises are quite superficial and easy to predict but it does not spoil any kind of enjoyment. It's pretty decent and well acted. 8/10.
I have to agree that is a bit confusing (like most TV movies of the 1990s) but for the rest is good. Eric Stoltz gives a nice performance as a young journalist that often goes to his mentor (William Macy) and ends involved with gorgeous Jennifer Connelly. I found the soundtrack chilling and added a lot to the thriller atmosphere.
Don't believe the few reviews here because if you are in the right mood you might like it.
It's a interesting movie to watch. With an all-star cast to boot. It's like a puzzle game to solve, but it's also a game of cat and mouse. With the puzzle been solved, but the game of cat and mouse results with the mouse getting away.
Eric Stoltz, Jennifer Connelly, William H. Macy makes the movie good. It's a shame that it was Vincent Price's last film.
3 out of 5 stars.
Did you know
- TriviaThe final role of Vincent Price to be released before his death in 1993. He would appear in the animated film Le voleur et le cordonnier (1993), which was released after his death.
- GoofsWhen David is leaving the newsroom he throws Blair's book into the box with his things but when he's saying goodbye to Simon, he hands the same book after picking it from his desk.
- Quotes
Elliot Burgess: Mr. Blair?
Austin Blair: Yes.
Elliot Burgess: There you go.
[shoots him]
Elliot Burgess: There I go.
[shoots himself]
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- La otra cara de la justicia
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro