Freejack

In 1991's "Freejack", 2009 is a dystopian future where nearly all-powerful corporations rule a ruined environment and a wrecked economy. OK, they got that correct but then again so did the equally cheesy "Robocop". By 2009, humans have mastered the ability to control the space-time continuum to the extent they can draw people forward and replace their minds with another being held in electronic stasis. OK, we haven't really mastered those things yet but damn our telephones have gotten pretty cool. Against this shaky premise "Freejack" puts together a cast that includes the less lunatic of the Sheen brothers, the criminally underused David Johansen, the peerless Anthony Hopkins and, yes, in the Boba Fett role, Mick Jagger. And despite the compelling screen stars, it is Jagger who maintains the audience's eye despite the ridiculous headgear he wears in most scenes and the equally ludicrous haircut beneath. Jagger's charisma nearly carries the film but given that it consists of one extended car (or motorcycle or champagne truck or tricked-out golf car) chase after another after another eventually even his power to charm cannot keep the mind from drifting. During this drifting one wonders why a man with the foresight to run the world's most powerful corporation wouldn't have had a back-up plan to pluck some other body from the past if things didn't work out with the first particularly given that any screw-ups would have meant his death? Anyway, in short, people who like their sci-fi cheap and cheesy or anyone who wishes Mick Jagger and David Johansen had done more movie work will be all-jacked-up by this film.

OK, I'm a sci-fi movie buff. So I'm the type of person who'd like this film.

But I do have some basic standards, and Freejack is just the right sort of campy flick, sort of a "Blade Runner" gone slumming. It's bad, but it's a good bad, if you're into cult classics.

Who should see this film:

-- sci-fi movie buffs, but don't go out of your way, oh and see Demolition Man too which is similar but better

-- nobody else

I enjoyed the film, but campy special effects and silly plot mean I can only give it a 6 out of 10.

In 1991, Formula One racer Alex Furlong (Emilio Estevez) is a promising rookie with a loving girlfriend in Julie Redlund (Rene Russo). When Alex Furlong's race car is involved in a fatal collision, Alex is spared death thanks to the efforts of Bonejackers (the movie's name for human gathering mercenaries) lead by Victor Vacendak (Mick Jagger) who teleport Alex to the future of 2009 intent on delivering him to a wealthy client who will transfer his consciousness into Alex's body. When the process leaves Alex conscious, he uses the momentary confusion of the Bonejackers to escape into the dystopian New York of 2009 as a "Freejack" (a man from the past who should have died and is now essentially property) finding 18 years have passed and Julie now working at international conglomerate Mac Corp under Ian McCandless (Anthony Hopkins).

Freejack is a loose adaptation of the 1959 science fiction novel Immortality, Inc. By Robert Sheckley. Written and produced by Ronald Shusett whose credits adorn such genre classics as the first Alien movie and Total Recall the film was a tumultuous production as director Geoff Murphy's initial cut of the film proved disastrous leading to Shusett reshooting 40% of the film. Released in the dump month of January in the U. S., Freejack made only about $17 million against its $30 million budget and only $37 million worldwide making the film a disappointment. The movie was also not well received by critics who unfavorably compared the film to Robocop, Total Recall, and Blade Runner. Freejack takes a promising enough premise and squanders it on dull and generic chase cliches.

The movie wastes no time in getting the ball rolling as Freejack throws the audience into this world it's created with not much prior establishment. After firing past the section set in 1991, the movie zips into the future of 2009 with Estevez' Alex running through standard cyberpunk 101 with corporate greed ruling the world while everyone else on the bottom rung fights for scraps (I think, there's honestly not all that much established regarding the poor and working class of this world other than they wear ragged clothes and shoot at each other). The future isn't all that unique as it's basically a remix of elements from Total Recall, Blade Runner, and Robocop smushed together with no real imprints of its own until the last 10 minutes where it finally plays with the ideas presented by its premise of manufactured and acquired immortality at the broadest and most surface level it can. Despite 18 years having passed between the "present" and the "future", none of the people Alex comes across look like they've aged a day. Rene Russo in particular has a major moment where she tells Alex how nearly 20 years have passed for her, but when they play footage from 1991 Russo's appearances between the two time periods look virtually identical with maybe only her hair being a little different. I will say that Mick Jagger was much better than I expected as the Bonejacker leader Vacendak as there's history of rock stars not doing all that well with genre crossovers (just look at Gene Simmons in Runaway for example) but Jagger despite being a little stiff does lend a bit more humor to the role than I was expecting.

Freejack is a generic sci-fi action thriller that's more concerned with cramming in interchangeable shootouts and chase sequences rather than actually exploring the ideas or themes it presents. There's nothing all that wrong with Freejack, but there's nothing all that right with it either. Freejack is the type of movie that feels like it was tailor made to take up cable air time in 2 a.m. Showings and that's probably the best way you can experience this film.

You know, one thing that really bothers me is the amount of people who just refuse to relax and watch a move without having to consider whether it should win an Oscar. I don't think Freejack was ever intended to be made for serious viewing - I think every actor in it at one time during the movie has got their tongue in their cheek.

What you do get in this movie are some spectacular effects, and I'm not talking about the end when you could just as soon go get a sandwich rather than watch the 2001-type slideshow.

It's just downright funny. Mick Jagger as the villain giving Emilio Estevez a "headstart" by counting 1-Mississippi, 2-Mississippi is priceless. David Johanson shines as the shyster in any timeframe. Rene Russo gives us an early indication of screen presence. So just relax and have fun with it.

I lap up anything with Emilio Estevez. I've always thought he was extremely underrated. Sometimes, he picks the silliest scripts. I did have some fun with this movie, but It's far from a good movie. The futuristic storyline has been done to death, and nothing really stands out about it. It has some entertaining action, good humor, and a great cast to keep you watching. As much as I love Emilio, he's not really the action star type. That being said, he managed to pull it off with his natural charisma. He borders on cockiness at times, but his charisma manages to keep him likable and easy to root for. Mick Jagger is terrible as the villain. He should have kept his day job, in lieu of dabbling into acting. Anthony Hopkins is here for a paycheck, nothing more. Rene Russo is classy as usual. She takes a one-dimensional part and makes it worthwhile. That's what genuine talent is able to do.

I enjoy it for what it is! Then again, I dig anything that is enjoyably cheesy. This movie falls under that category. They were obviously aiming for much more, but they weren't able to pull it off. Keep your expectations low, and you'll have a decent time

5.5/10