Conspiracy: The Trial of the Chicago 8

This is an innovative, historical, and very well acted account of the US Government's attempt to put a generation of anti-war protestors on trial. From a political standpoint this film succeeds in outlining the key issues protestors had against the Vietnam War. From a legal standpoint this film succeeds in defining what may have been the most unorthodox and legally flawed trial ever to take place in America. On the artistic side, this film combines fantastic actors who embody the spirit of the true life defendants as well as offering intertwined detailed accounts from the participants themselves.

In respect to the reviewer who stated this wasn't what he remembered, I can only say that media accounts usually do not cover events accurately and that this whole docudrama is taken from the actual court transcripts. As someone who has taught and studied this trial and accounts, I assure you will not find better.

For an understanding of what divided and still splinters our country, this truly is required viewing.

Required viewing for all American History students should be the rule. Thanks to the great actors, Mickael Lembeck, Elliott Gould, Peter Boyle, Brian Benben, and all the others, this film takes you back to when America's youth set out to made a statement and when they really believed they could change the world..... and didn't we in some ways???

I watched this on YouTube the day after I saw The Trial of the Chicago 7, and whilst I liked the latter, I was impressed by the drama/documentary style of Conspiracy, and the fact that it was based on court records and interviews with all of the defendants and the three main defending lawyers who were alive at the time.

Comparing the two casts, I can't fault the actors, but in this one as William Kunstler Robert Loggia has an edge on Mark Rylance, and David Opatashu as Julius Hoffman has an edge on Frank Langella.

If you haven't seen either, I suggest you watch this one first to get more of the truth about a shameful period of American justice.

Anne Kerr (I925 - 1973), Labour MP for Rochester and Chatham from 1964 - 1970, is portrayed in a small part by an uncredited Carolyn Seymour. Kerr died of acute alcoholic poisoning, and at her inquest, her husband Russell Kerr (also a Labour MP), said that she had never really recovered from being beaten by police at Chicago five years earlier.

This is a docudrama about the trial of the Chicago 7. I earlier reviewed the recent 2020 Netflix film by Aaron Sorkin called "The Trial of the Chicago 7." The 1987 film has the advantage of including brief interviews with each of the defendants and the two defense lawyers. Both lawyers and at least three of the defendants were dead by the time of the 2020 film.

The unique characteristics of the 1987 film were that it takes place solely within the courtroom using language from the trial transcripts. The setting is that the viewer is in the position of a jury member; on numerous occasions, the lawyers speak directly into the camera. In the background on occasion, clips are shown from actual footage taken on the streets of Chicago and inside the convention hall. Bobby Seale (Carl Lumbly) has the highest profile in the film as his demand for recognition of his constitutional rights receives major play. David Dellinger (Peter Boyle) has a much larger role than in the Netflix film, as does Rennie Davis (Robert Carradine). Davis is a much stronger character than portrayed in the Netflix production.

Abbie Hoffman (Michael Lembeck) and Jerry Rubin (Barry Miller) play the Yippie roles well, though Abbie Hoffman has slightly less profile in this film. William Kunstler (Robert Loggia) is well-played; Leonard Weinglass (Elliott Gould), who is almost invisible in the Netflix production, has a significant profile in this one. The prosecutors, Richard Schultz (David Clennon) and Tom Foran (Harris Yulin), are even less sympathetic in the HBO film. Judge Hoffman (David Opatoshu) plays his biases very well.

In my mind, today's film from 1987 was superior to the 2020 Netflix film. I think some scenes are more memorable, especially the Bobby Seale-Judge Hoffman exchanges. Martin Sheen has a minuscule role as a businessman who witnessed some police bad behavior. Allen Ginsburg (Ron Rifkin) recites some of his poetry and does some om chanting to both the prosecutors and Judge Hoffman's dismay.

It's a good history lesson; I recommend it.

As someone who was living in Chicago in 1968 and very sympathetic to the Chicago 8 at the time, this is not quite the way I remember it. I went to high school (Berkeley-class of 57) with two of the defendants (Froines and Seale) and followed this trial about as closely (newspapers and TV accounts) as you could without being there in the courtroom.

While this film represents itself as factual and uses a lot of actual footage of the events, I don't buy it all. Judge Hoffman was not that tolerant or sympathetic nor defense attorney Kunstler that kooky, and little of what went on behind the scenes, especially with Mayor Daly, is not conveyed. This was one of the great political trials of the century and you don't get a sense of the true politics involved. One simple example is that the city of Chicago thought it was on trial, as much as the defendants were, and I got little feel for that from this account.

If you want the history of this trial read up on it, this movie must be taken with a bit of a grain of salt.