David Copperfield

I remember this adaptation from the 80's. I saw it on Masterpiece Theater when I lived in the US. I had it in my personal video collection and watched it over and over again. I thought it was perfect. Simon Callow as Macawber was brilliant. I would love to see it again. I wonder if writing to the BBC would help.

Because it was 10 episodes long, it was very faithful to the book and the attention to detail was excellent.

Every characterization was spot on from Aunt Betsy Trotwood and Mr Dick to the vile Murdstone. The acting was superb.

I also think that the BBC's adaptation of Oliver Twist from around the same time was the best.

I remember watching this adaptation of Dickens'masterpiece "David Copperfield" on BBC back in 1986, and I had fond memories of it. Therefore I was exited when I found the DVD of this series in a shop this December. Now watching the whole series again after so many years, I'm still pleased to see how 'complete'the story is. Many adaptations of DC leave out some characters from the original novel or skip some episodes. The classic adaptation with W.C. Fields leaves out the whole Salem House school episode, thus robbing the viewer of one of the more memorable character Mr. Creackle; and I still don't see why they decided to do it that way for it forced the scriptwriter to find a new way to introduce Steerforth into the story. And poor Tommy Traddles! Always a sort of underdog in the novel and obviously regarded as an insignificant figure by many who adapted DC for the screen, as his character is mostly dropped. it's so good that this series does not follow that trend and show Traddles 'in his full glory'. Overall the acting is excellent;it's also good that the grown David looks convincingly like David as child. Heartily recommended!

A brilliant adaptation, along with the 1999 and 1935 versions it is one of the best adaptations of possibly one of Charles Dickens' best books. Dickens is very difficult to adapt, and David Copperfield while not as huge as Our Mutual Friend and Bleak House and not with as many subplots is no exception to that. His work is difficult to adapt because of how he wrote about the aesthetics and such of the time; he had a mix of funny comedy, genuine foreboding and heart-breaking tragedy that not all adaptations of his work bring out entirely successfully; and the question of the characters being believable, with the villains not being too camp, the female heroines/characters not being bland and the side characters not being too much like grotesque caricatures.

Back to this David Copperfield, it is atmospheric without being too bleak and sumptuous without being too clean, it's beautifully shot as well. The music is one of the more appealing music scores of any David Copperfield adaptation, haunting and beautiful as one would want. The dialogue flows naturally, is succinct and easy to understand while capturing Dickens' spirit and stylistic flavour, while the story is not too rushed or draggy- even with the story stretched over 10 episodes-, is faithful to the book and Dickens and is comprehensible.

The cast are uniformly strong. Colin Hurley is an identifiable David, a softer interpretation than some but it works and he isn't too bland. Extra marks also for handsomeness and a real effort to make all three Davids alike. The other two younger boys as the character engage too. Standing out in particular in the cast were Simon Callow's unforgettably funny Micawber, Paul Brightwell whose Uriah Heep is an absolute weasel and Oliver Cotton's cruelly chilling and vily cold Murdstone. Brenda Bruce is very good as Betsy Trotwood, and John Savident is one of the more memorable Creakles. Natalie Ogle is beautiful and innocent and Sandra Payne's Mrs Micawber is warm and funny.

Overall, brilliant and one of the best David Copperfield adaptations. 10/10 Bethany Cox

In short, skip this version as it offers nothing that the 1974 version only 12 years prior does much better. The casting is terrible, so much so that a day after having seen it I can scarcely remember the faces of the actors. The production is low budget and clunky, worse than the 1974 earlier version. It is however a thorough adaptation and was a little clearer on some details over the 1974 version in regards to locations and how the many characters timelines interweave in the middle 3rd of the novel. But ultimately it's not worth buying the dvd (it's not available online legal or otherwise as of 2021) to invest the time in this one when if you are looking for a thorough adaptation the 1974 version is superior in every sense. And The 1999 version is much more watchable if you don't mind some things being abridged for the sake of brevity.

This is a beautifully scripted and acted version of the Dickens novel. The mini-series form allows the most detailed and complete rendition yet. Performances are especially fine, with three fine young Davids (though none to compare with the definitive Freddie Bartholomew), and a Mr. Macawber by Simon Callow to rank with the classic W.C.Fields. This is the only adaptation I've seen to rival the wonderful David O. Selznick Hollywood B&W film. This surely will sound like heresy to many British folk, but Selznick's film sets the stage for his masterful paring-down of Gone With the Wind, and gives the essentials for our enjoyment. Still, I wish this BBC mini-series would be issued for home video (ONE multi-layered DVD would do it). Then I could play it for my bright young nieces. Such exposure MIGHT even lead them to read the book when they get a little older, just as the Selznick did for me. Top marks all round!!