Tai-Pan

first, inject countless clichés and stereotypes, populate the cast with some well-knowns, and add some 'tit'illation.

and wait for the box office receipts to pour in!!!

I am very very disappointed in this film which I purchased on VHS. its one of those I *know* I wont be watching a 2nd time.

it meanders, gap toothed, and those stereotypes just weigh it down till it sinks in Hong Kong harbor. and of course, top it all off with a quickie pan of modern day Hong Kong.

some good acting but not enough to overcome the numerous shortcomings.

I didn't read the book but Im sure it far outclasses this quickie 2 + hour 'featurette'. is there a Hollywood ombudsman you can call up to you know, get your money back or something?

Im glad IMDb exists so that duds like this can be outed and red-flagged.

As another reviewer put it, this movie was very similar to Dune. Very interesting comparison, since Raffaella De Laurentiis produced them both. This was her first project right after Dune. Both were sweeping epic sagas with multiple intertwined plotlines. Both should have been six or eight hour mini series and not feature films. As with Dune, you will find that if you have not read the book, you will not understand the movie. However, if you have read the book, then the movie isn't all that bad. James Clavell's 'Asian Saga' is one of my favorite book series, so I bought this movie cheap just to see it. The characters are like old friends to me, so I didn't think that the movie was all that bad. I realized while watching it though, that someone who had not read the book would not be able to keep up with all of the plot points. My suggestion to you is to read the book, then watch the movie. You will discover two things; first it's a super good book. Second, this movie had everything going for it in cast and settings; it just had too much story to tell in too short a time. It definitely should have been a six-hour miniseries.

Tai-Pan was probably too ambitious an undertaking for a film as short as just over 2 hours. Maybe a mini-series would have been the answer, but Tai-Pan certainly had the potential to be an oriental Gone With The Wind.

Unrealized potential though it is. The screenplay made many references to previous events in the novel that are not shown here. We do know there's one nasty rivalry going on between Bryan Brown and John Stanton who both rose to wealth in the China trade like the protagonists in an Edna Ferber novel.

Bryan Brown is the Far East version of Rhett Butler. He's built the family fortune on legal trade and illegal trade in opium. Not that opium was unknown before the British and other European powers got there, but they did turn it into a thriving business. When the Chinese government objected, the European powers took nibbles out of a prostrate and weakened state.

One of those nibbles the British took was Hong Kong, spoils from the Opium War of 1841. Brown like Margaret Mitchell's Rhett Butler or the hero of many Edna Ferber books is the guy who builds what became one of the busiest trading centers on the globe.

Unlike his rival Stanton, Brown's wife left him and took their small son back to the United Kingdom. Brown didn't mourn he took up with some Chinese women, they were pawns in various business negotiations. He got a son, Russell Wong, from one of them.

Things get interesting when his other son arrives from Great Britain played by Tim Guinee. He's a rather uptight Victorian youth who is not pleased with the debauchery he finds and his father's part in it.

Tai-Pan is exquisitely photographed with the climatic typhoon scene very well done indeed. A better screenplay would have been needed to tell this epic story.

Very average epic about the birth of the Hong Kong colony , being and overerblown and lousily paced retelling . A disjointed mess set in 19th Century when a powerful lord has to escape from Canton due to "Opium War" and to go a coastal location to be founded the city of Hong Kong . The chief trader , Tai Pan: Bryan Brown , dreams of establishing a colony of commerce to be callled Hong Kong and , eventually , he gets it .

This in an inferior, pretentious epic , whose basis for the film is the James Clavell's novel of the same name, regarding some very free historic events about the origin of the Hong Kong colony, including some really ludricous characters . As a Scottish trader : Bryan Brown and his beautiful mistress : Joan Chen are the main roles in this confusing attempt to dramatize the story of Hong Kong's foundation and development into an important trading port . Along the way the principal plot is mingled with loving conflicts , personal vengeances and ambition for possession of Hong Kong port . It packs love stories , violent confrontation , fights , brief nudism and anything else . The film goes wrong due to too many subplots and roles are badly introduced in a short time to do justice to the much better novel ; Tai Pan . This mixed bag plays like a TV miniseries chopped from seven hours to two . Along with main starring : Bryan Brown, Joan Chen , appearing familiar faces as newcomers : Tim Guinee, Janine Turner , Kyra Sedgwick and veteran support cast as Bert Remsen and John Stanton .

Here stands out the moving and spectacular musical score by the great John Barry, as well as colorful cinematography by prestigious cameraman Jack Cardiff . Shot on location in Hong Kong and considred to be the first American production completely filmed in China . The motion picture was regularly directed by Daryl Duke and it failed totally in the world box office , in spite of the big budget financed by Raffaela de Laurentiis , Dino's daughter. Daryl Duke was a craftsman who usually directed episodes of notorious TV series and occassionally made some movies as "I heard the Owl call my name" , " Payday" , "President's plane is missing" , "Silent Partner" and " The Thornbirds", among others . Rating 4.5/10 , a middlingly made movie .

It's worth pointing out that I came to this film having read James Clavell's excellent novel, TAI-PAN, on which this is based. If I hadn't read the book beforehand, I probably would have enjoyed this adaptation a lot more.

Sadly, I was left feeling that the filmed TAI-PAN is a crushing disappointment, purely because it cuts so very much out of the story. The whole background is missing, the Triad stuff, the politics, the trade with the Chinese. The story is reduced to the human relationships and particularly the family rivalries between the main characters, but there was so much more to it than that.

I do understand that films are very different to books and that adaptations have to cut material out, but TAI-PAN has a two hour running time and a lot of it is slow-paced. If it had told events at a much faster pace, it would have been able to include a lot more of the details and subtleties that are missing here. As it is, there are elements of greatness - plus the novelty of seeing Bryan Brown in a leading role - but it could have been so much more. A miniseries would suffice better, I think.