IMDb RATING
6.4/10
1.6K
YOUR RATING
A 50-year-old married man begins an extramarital relationship which creates uncomfortable friction in his family between his long-time wife and grown children.A 50-year-old married man begins an extramarital relationship which creates uncomfortable friction in his family between his long-time wife and grown children.A 50-year-old married man begins an extramarital relationship which creates uncomfortable friction in his family between his long-time wife and grown children.
- Nominated for 1 Oscar
- 3 nominations total
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
While the story is bittersweet with a cast of talented actors who are great in their roles as a blue collar family dealing with the uncomfortable mid-life changes of the father figure who begins an extramarital relationship, what captured my eyes and heart were the nostalgic 1980s scenes around the Seattle/Puget Sound area along with the working-class style of a 1980s family.
From the Kingdome that was demolished in 2000, to a ferry ride on the Spokane ferry built in 1972 by the Todd Shipyards in Seattle, to the city skyline, to the simple street scenes, this movie offers a taste of a time gone by that no longer exists as it once did in the 1980s.
Along with the Seattle scenery is the style within the movie, from the kitchen cupboards in their home, to the dishes on the table, to the television set, to a lowkey heartfelt wedding put together by family and friends.
These are little things I remember from the 1980s and when the Puget Sound area was full of working-class families; the movie captures them beautifully in the background giving the film a touch of nostalgic realism that I appreciate as a GenXer from South Puget Sound.
From the Kingdome that was demolished in 2000, to a ferry ride on the Spokane ferry built in 1972 by the Todd Shipyards in Seattle, to the city skyline, to the simple street scenes, this movie offers a taste of a time gone by that no longer exists as it once did in the 1980s.
Along with the Seattle scenery is the style within the movie, from the kitchen cupboards in their home, to the dishes on the table, to the television set, to a lowkey heartfelt wedding put together by family and friends.
These are little things I remember from the 1980s and when the Puget Sound area was full of working-class families; the movie captures them beautifully in the background giving the film a touch of nostalgic realism that I appreciate as a GenXer from South Puget Sound.
"Twice in a Lifetime" is one of only two films I have ever seen that is successful in showing lead characters who are both likable and unlikeable at different points in the movie...that is, showing the full range of what makes us "human." The other movie, by the way, was "Shoot the Moon," and I was surprised to see that someone else on this board also found similarities between the two.
I see some thought that Amy Madigan's "Sunny" character was too over-the-top, but I found her riveting and compelling. Others obviously did too, as I believe she was the most nominated actor/actress from this film.
I see some thought that Amy Madigan's "Sunny" character was too over-the-top, but I found her riveting and compelling. Others obviously did too, as I believe she was the most nominated actor/actress from this film.
It's as if scenarist Colin Welland realized, about halfway through writing this rather standard account of a husband and wife breaking up and then readjusting to their new lives, that he didn't have much of a story going on and went "Blimey! Better start padding things out". How else to account for the none too interesting forays into the lives of the couple's two daughters and their spouses? To mention nothing of lots of picture postcards of Seattle on rare sunny days. (Wonder how long the shooting sched had to be to dodge this gloomy burg's pervasive rain and overcast?) That the viewer sticks with it (well, this viewer) without putting a dent in the fast forward is mostly due to the plethora of fine acting by Hackman, Burstyn, Margret, Madigan, Sheedy, Lang and Dennehy. And when the acting is all first rate, even when delivered by the above pros, the director, in this case TV vet Bud Yorkin, must be given some recognition even though Yorkin's visual sense is strictly small screen, and thus totally at the service of Welland.
8tavm
After 30 years of only reading about this movie, I finally watched this with my mom on Netflix disc. Gene Hackman plays a middle-aged man who feels his life is just routine. When he celebrates his 50th birthday, he does so at a bar without his family members-they had done so earlier-and meets Ann-Margret-a new barmaid there. Their affair is eventually revealed by someone who knows both. His wife-Ellen Burstyn-doesn't take it well, of course, but it's one of his daughters-Amy Madigan-who really flies off the handle when she finds out. I'll stop there and just say there's no false note here, it's portrayed quite honestly mostly from beginning to end. Ally Sheedy and Brian Dennehy round out the fine cast with good help from producer-director Bud Yorkin. This was a mostly fine drama. So on that note, Mom and me highly recommend Twice in a Lifetime. P.S. This review is dedicated in memory of Yorkin. Also, this was shot in Seattle where one of my sisters currently lives with her family.
At the beginning of "Twice in a Lifetime", when the McKenzie family is sitting around the dining room table celebrating, Ellen Burstyn gives long-time husband Gene Hackman a kiss, but nobody notices how he recoils a bit from her affection or how shaky his smile appears. Here is a well-made dramatic piece for a group of terrific actors, asking us to look at all sides of a divorce, offering only a few pat answers but mostly moving sequences. Hackman quickly falls into a loving relationship--which can be seen as possibly too convenient--but the woman in question is Ann-Margret at her most vivacious, so we can forgive the formula. Burstyn's character goes through the standard changes of the jilted wife, yet the talents of this wonderful actress helps transcend the clichés of such a role (she even gives it subtext and meaning; a movie about her character alone would be worth-watching). Amy Madigan's angry daughter is an overwrought creation, a one-note role, and the way she's written and directed we don't see any nuances--just her irritation. Still, many fine ingredients are included here, and the supporting players are wonderful (particularly Brian Dennehy, always good, and Ally Sheedy). Alternately tough and tender, the emotions played out at the finale are concrete--they make sense--giving this film the edge over similar pictures such as "Smash Palace" and "Shoot The Moon". *** from ****
Did you know
- TriviaThe film was nominated for one Academy Award® for Best Actress in a Supporting Role for Amy Madigan but lost out to Anjelica Huston for L'honneur des Prizzi (1985).
- GoofsWhen Harry is watching a baseball game on TV after celebrating his 50th birthday, the television screen shows the White Sox at the plate, but the audio track reports a Mariners player hitting a home run.
- SoundtracksTwice in a Lifetime
Written and Performed by Paul McCartney
- How long is Twice in a Lifetime?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Twice in a Lifetime
- Filming locations
- Snohomish, Washington, USA(street scenes of downtown Holden)
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $8,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross US & Canada
- $8,402,424
- Gross worldwide
- $8,402,424
- Runtime1 hour 51 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content