Un ennemi du peuple

Poor health dogged Satyajit Ray during his last days. Critics have opined that his last works do not measure up to his earlier films. GANASHATRU, based on a play 'Enemy of the people' by Norwegian playwright Henrik Ibsen, is among the final works of the most famous Indian filmmaker ever. The film may be weaker in comparison to some of his best works, but this drama has a Contemporaneity in the Indian context, and in this respect, the film has a greater relevance than his well-appreciated works. The film which showcases the story of an upright doctor (Soumitro Chattopadhyay) facing a hostile municipal chairman his own brother (Dhritiman Chattopadhyay) and a hostile society for suspecting contaminated water from a temple to cause a lethal strain of Hepatitis killing several people in a mofussil town, is in essence a thought-provoking 'science versus religion' essay. Ray is possibly the only reputed Indian filmmaker who has questioned blind religious beliefs in his works (Devi, Mahapurush, Ganashatru).

(1989) Ganashatru (In Bengali with English subtitles) DRAMA

Adapted from the play by Henrik Ibsen music, co-written and directed by Satyajit Ray that centers on a situation of a doctor, Ashok Gupta (Soumitra Chattopadhyay) who is waiting for test results of a water from a holy temple after it was concluded the patient of his may have died from. And while he is waiting he also calls up a newspaper friend, Haridas Bagchi (Dipankar Dey) of his to wait for him at his house. And while Ashok's wife, Maya Gupta (Ruma Guhathakurta) is entertaining her guest by serving him pastry and tea, Haridas Ashok's younger brother, Nishith Gupta (Dhritiman Chattopadhya) shows up he happens to be municipal chairman of the city of Chandipur. We then meet Ranen Haldar (Bhishma Guhathakurta) who happens to be a student as well as an inspired writer. Ranen also happens to be fiance of the Gupta's daughter, Ranu who works as a teacher. And by the time Ashok shows up , he is then informs him that the water from the holy site may be contaminated. Ashok then clashes with his younger brother over this since he is the municipal chairman before he clashes with his best friend, Haridas over the posting out the story for the residents to know about.

Upon watching it, is reminiscent of another movie also based on a play called "The Big Knife" made in 1955 and the movie "Rope" in which the entire story itself is confined to just a few areas or limited areas and space. For "The Big Knife" the entire movie is limited to just the living room of the house, in this one it is limited to the Gupta's family home the newspaper office and some of it on stage where the debate was being at. I think I fell asleep upon watching "The Big Knife" and with "Rope" not so much because it was supposed to be filmed all on one long take, this one is quite good but too much dialogue the movie gets better when the debate or arguing happens between the newspaper editor the municipal chairman butting heads with the doctor.

Doctor Soumitra Chatterjee has been tracking the source of an epidemic and has concluded, after laboratory reports, that that water in the local temple has been polluted and causing the outbreak. Yet there are strong forces opposing him, not only the reigious conservatives, but business interests who see that temple as a souce of tourism and revenue. Even his brother is ranged against him, and more than willing to destroy him rather than close down the temple to fix the problem.

Satyajit Ray;s movie is based on Ibsen's 1882, and sticks mainly to the original's concerns, despite some changes made for its Indian setting. Ray's handling and ending is a little more standardized that the play, but it remains a powerful piece.

A public health hazard threatens the lives of an entire city, but when a doctor discovers the truth about its cause, a politician fears that disclosing it will hurt tourism and the local economy. Moreover, in contradiction to science, religious leaders believe that the town will be protected without taking any action, relying on superstitious beliefs. The health issue thus becomes politicized, the heart of this drama, and the one who is trying to tell people the truth is branded an "enemy of the people" by those not acting in the community's best interest. It's brother against brother, when everyone should be working together to prevent an epidemic. The politician distorts the truth in a fiery speech to a crowd, playing on their anger and ignorance, and manipulates others into speaking against him as well.

Satyajit Ray saw in Ibsen's 1882 play truths that applied to India over a century later, and it's easy to see the parallels to the events in America and other nationalist countries over the past couple years, which are really quite striking. That's something that could have really resonated with me, but the trouble is, the film is too lethargic to really enjoy. Most of its scenes are indoors, dialogue-heavy, and repetitive. There is just not enough meat on the bones of this story, and the characters are flat. It has its heart in the right place, and imagining people in the current public eye as the characters in the film provided some level of enjoyment, so for those things it was worth seeing, even if it did fall a little short.

"Ganashatru" is certainly one of the best movies of Satyajit Ray, though not one of his most popular ones. The story is set up in a small town of India and is brutally realistic. The film depicts the superstitions and ignorance one might find in an Indian town (or for that matter in any Indian City). The main characters are brilliantly portrayed by Soumitra Chatterjee, Dipankar Dey, Subhendu Chatterjee and Dhritiman. The reason this movie has not had any popularity is mainly because of the blind religious superstitions that lives amongst most of us and has blinded us in seeing the truth.

A must watch, if one believes that film makers have a duty towards educating the society.