A film crew making a low budget vampire film is unaware that the leading man is a real vampire and has his sights set on the leading lady.A film crew making a low budget vampire film is unaware that the leading man is a real vampire and has his sights set on the leading lady.A film crew making a low budget vampire film is unaware that the leading man is a real vampire and has his sights set on the leading lady.
Michael A. Miranda
- Baisez
- (as Silvio Oliviero)
Lesley Kelly
- Martina
- (as Leslie Kelly)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
The vampire from the original film returns. The disappearance of the leading man from a low budget vampire flick forces the makers to recast. They ending up casting the fiend from part one, never realizing he is a vampire until it is too late and has transformed the leading lady into a vamp. Good premise, poor execution. Nowhere near as original or smart as the first film, but still a nice try. Rated R; Violence, Nudity, and Sexual Situations.
A horror film can be many things, scary, visceral, spooky, threatening, disturbing, silly, stupid, over the edge or over the top, just plain brilliant or just bad. But one thing it should never, ever, be is....dull.
And this film is dull, deadly dull, duller than Dullsville, USA. Not sure if it is supposed to actually be a horror film or is as alleged, an erotic tale in a horror film setting. Whatever, with it's laboured sex scenes, awful saxophone based soundtrack, you'd need a shed load of Viagra to get even the slightest aroused.
With the worst of the eighties, BIG hair, supposed sensual smoking and a vampire who looks more like Starsky from the TV series and who plays pool, in one of those 'film within a film,' beloved of film critics.
Sometimes, having the writer director in the same role, makes for a single vision and a strong defined film. Other times, you just get like this, self indulgent drivel.
I was losing the will to live about half an hour into this. There seems to be an ending or sorts, as the vampire has passed his blood sucking and pool playing skills on to his heir, but frankly, it just isn't worth bothering with. Rent or buy any other vampire film but this one!
And this film is dull, deadly dull, duller than Dullsville, USA. Not sure if it is supposed to actually be a horror film or is as alleged, an erotic tale in a horror film setting. Whatever, with it's laboured sex scenes, awful saxophone based soundtrack, you'd need a shed load of Viagra to get even the slightest aroused.
With the worst of the eighties, BIG hair, supposed sensual smoking and a vampire who looks more like Starsky from the TV series and who plays pool, in one of those 'film within a film,' beloved of film critics.
Sometimes, having the writer director in the same role, makes for a single vision and a strong defined film. Other times, you just get like this, self indulgent drivel.
I was losing the will to live about half an hour into this. There seems to be an ending or sorts, as the vampire has passed his blood sucking and pool playing skills on to his heir, but frankly, it just isn't worth bothering with. Rent or buy any other vampire film but this one!
I believe this is the first review I've done of a movie I couldn't stand. This seems appropriate since this is the only vampire movie I can EVER remember seeing that I didn't at least remotely enjoy. (Heck, I even rented "A Polish Vampire in Burbank" more than once!)
"The Understudy" had to be the most boring horror film I've ever seen. In fact, I honestly can't recall now, whether I made it all the way to the end or not. I hate movies in which you cannot ever really tell whether you are seeing fantasy or reality. That's fine for a short dream sequence -- but not the bulk of a movie!
The one and only highlight for me was the film editor (or whoever he was) looking at a strip of film & inexplicably getting the willies -- then seeing one frame on which the vampire had revealed its fangs. Quite a highlight for a full-length film, no?
This film might be useful for breaking a child of his/her fear of vampires. The only thing scary about this one was the fear of going to sleep and falling off the sofa. The only "Children of the Night" you hear in the background are the turkeys gobbling over this clucker!
"The Understudy" had to be the most boring horror film I've ever seen. In fact, I honestly can't recall now, whether I made it all the way to the end or not. I hate movies in which you cannot ever really tell whether you are seeing fantasy or reality. That's fine for a short dream sequence -- but not the bulk of a movie!
The one and only highlight for me was the film editor (or whoever he was) looking at a strip of film & inexplicably getting the willies -- then seeing one frame on which the vampire had revealed its fangs. Quite a highlight for a full-length film, no?
This film might be useful for breaking a child of his/her fear of vampires. The only thing scary about this one was the fear of going to sleep and falling off the sofa. The only "Children of the Night" you hear in the background are the turkeys gobbling over this clucker!
My review was written in July 1989 after watching the film on Virgin Vision video cassette.
This sequel to the 1987 vampire pic dwells on the behind-the-scenes aspects of horror filmmaking. Direct-to-video release should scare up some genre fan interest.
Silvio Oliviero encores as the real-life vampire who appears on a movie set and replaces the missing leading man (who's actually been killed by one of Oliviero's minions). He causes no end of trouble until the director (Mark Soper) finally figures out he's the real thing. Rather silly plot twist lets Sop4er and Oliviero shooting a game ol 9-ball to determine the heroine's fate.
Canadian helmer Gerard Ciccoritti generally eschews humor here, going for a fragmented structure as well as a dark and dour mood. Cast is effective, especially sexy heroine Wendy Gazelle.
This sequel to the 1987 vampire pic dwells on the behind-the-scenes aspects of horror filmmaking. Direct-to-video release should scare up some genre fan interest.
Silvio Oliviero encores as the real-life vampire who appears on a movie set and replaces the missing leading man (who's actually been killed by one of Oliviero's minions). He causes no end of trouble until the director (Mark Soper) finally figures out he's the real thing. Rather silly plot twist lets Sop4er and Oliviero shooting a game ol 9-ball to determine the heroine's fate.
Canadian helmer Gerard Ciccoritti generally eschews humor here, going for a fragmented structure as well as a dark and dour mood. Cast is effective, especially sexy heroine Wendy Gazelle.
In my previous IMDb review, for To Die For (1988), I declared my hatred for romantic vampire films. So what do I watch next? Only another goddamn romantic vampire film: The Understudy: Graveyard Shift II, which features another love-struck bloodsucker.
Despite also being directed by Jerry Ciccoritti, and once again starring Silvio Oliviero as a vampire, Graveyard Shift II is a sequel in name only, but it is every bit as pretentious and dull as the first film, if not more so, with horrible characters spouting turgid, often incomprehensible dialogue ("I'm your desire... that makes me real for you", "A star doesn't need flesh, because a star is just a light in the sky").
The film takes place during the shooting of a horror movie about a pool shark vampire, and sees actress Camilla (Wendy Gazelle) falling under the spell of Baisez (Oliviero), the mysterious man who takes over the role of the hustling bloodsucker. What follows is virtually unwatchable nonsense, characters talking utter gibberish and occasionally engaging in artfully lit bouts of soft-core sex (accompanied by nasty wailing saxophone music), with very little in the way of horror. It's self-indulgent dreck from a director with delusions of grandeur (Ciccoritti would soon find his place directing for TV).
Despite also being directed by Jerry Ciccoritti, and once again starring Silvio Oliviero as a vampire, Graveyard Shift II is a sequel in name only, but it is every bit as pretentious and dull as the first film, if not more so, with horrible characters spouting turgid, often incomprehensible dialogue ("I'm your desire... that makes me real for you", "A star doesn't need flesh, because a star is just a light in the sky").
The film takes place during the shooting of a horror movie about a pool shark vampire, and sees actress Camilla (Wendy Gazelle) falling under the spell of Baisez (Oliviero), the mysterious man who takes over the role of the hustling bloodsucker. What follows is virtually unwatchable nonsense, characters talking utter gibberish and occasionally engaging in artfully lit bouts of soft-core sex (accompanied by nasty wailing saxophone music), with very little in the way of horror. It's self-indulgent dreck from a director with delusions of grandeur (Ciccoritti would soon find his place directing for TV).
Did you know
- TriviaSoo Garay's debut.
- ConnectionsFollows Central Park Driver (1986)
Details
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content