Spellcaster

Most everything wrong in the '80s had an influence on this movie. Including the fact it was made in '91. An all around bad horror movie with bad acting and a trite, simplistic script.

Richard Blade is given top billing in this mess and is the reason I watched this movie. Currently, in 2007, Mr Blade is an oldies DJ on a radio station in Los Angeles. That was enough to get me to watch this stinker. In the '80s Mr Blade was a popular "Video Jockey" and hence his casting as a "Popular Video Jockey" hosting a contest being held in a castle.

Nothing against Mr. Blade personally. I'm sure he was offered money and a chance to broaden his professional resume. If nothing else he proves being a good DJ and a good VJ does not translate into being a good actor.

Possibly the movie is bad enough that in a few years this movie can be seen as a true howler for it's script, acting and true datedness.

Currently is should only be viewed after checking it's listing here on IMDb to note several of those connected to this horror-ible dud went on to have actual careers! The only true horror I see here is a nail in the coffin of the '80s being dead.

That's all Folks!

I first saw this in the early 90s on a vhs which I owned. I found the film very lousy then. Never played the vhs again. Revisited it few days back. The special effects is by John Carl Buechler n the creatures n demons were all done well but the makers did not utilize em properly. Most of the kills r lousy n offscreen. The movie has a shower scene without nudity, an offscreen sex scene without nudity, a bathtub bathing scene without nudity.

So basically there r no good kills, no scare factor n nudity at all n all this makes it a lousy horror film. The film has a unique transformation scene of a fatter lookalike of Lou Ferrigno into a man pig. Some may argue that the film Willow (1988) has lots of men transforming into pigs.

The ending is again a big meh. We have Albert Band father of filmmaker Charles Band as the wierd cook.

I am a fan of, now bankrupt, Full Moon Pictures but this Empire Pictures film by Charles Band just plain sucked. You either like the B-horror or you hate it and this one had HATE written all over it. First why did Adam Ant only arrive in the last 10 minutes of the movie? Hard to say, the only conclusion I could come to is that they couldn't afford to pay him so just hired him for the final scene? This movie was just plain junk, the only thing it had going for it is that it was shot in a castle over in another country. So had some cool scenes but everything else just fell flat on it's face. I do like some of Charles Band's movies but this is NOT one of them. Slasher Reviewer gives this one a thumbs down, and why was is rated R? No nudity, no gore? Should of been rated PG!

Spellcaster - 1988 (released in 1992) (This Film Rates a B- ) Adam Ant as Diablo! Total late 1980's early 1990's feel from the music to the artsy fartsy production. Brother and sister Tom and Jackie (Lost orphans) win a radio contest where they are to participate in a treasure hunt in Italy. There are several other annoying rich eccentric narcissistic characters who have also won the contest. The ultimate prize is one million dollars and the first to find the check in the castle wins. After a shady deal the contest is rigged. One by one each contestant is killed off as the house comes alive through black magic and selling of souls. You won't care who gets killed off because they all deserve it and everyone gets a second chance in the end. Everything about this film is overdone. Its total cheese and filled with cheap MTV effects. Laughable throughout whether intentional or not. No T&A. Plus watching a true desperate alcoholic licking alcohol off the floor is fun. Its not great but it sure is fun.

A very bad 80's B-horror movie with awful acting bad effects and some amateur. Adam Ant headlines the movie, yet is in it for 5 minutes camera work. Gave it an extra star for the Death by chair scene, which was a new one for me. Avoid unless you are really bored.