Powaqqatsi
- 1988
- Tous publics
- 1h 39m
IMDb RATING
7.2/10
9.2K
YOUR RATING
An exploration of technologically developing nations and the effect the transition to Western-style modernization has had on them.An exploration of technologically developing nations and the effect the transition to Western-style modernization has had on them.An exploration of technologically developing nations and the effect the transition to Western-style modernization has had on them.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
The imaginative slow-motion documentary without any line,sequence, camera just goes through nature , cities and public over third world counties. Everydays routines seems amazing , ordinary motions put in slow are breath-taking.Sense for camera scenes and views and extraordinary shots make this one worth to see. Plus mixed with Philip Glass's composed music - it is relaxing and mild. Also you can find some scenes showing our world going to destructive end and the most moving scene in the end when there is shown that we mostly even can not see pictures like these because this "kind" of world is situated behind a certain curtain, for most of us hard to see through - we live above and look only to our reflections.
Koyannisqatsi wasn't a copy of anything, so why would anyone expect Powaqqatsi to be a copy of it? Fortunately, I saw this film on the big screen without seeing its predecessor, and I was delighted. The movie begins with a shot of an African diamond mine. You see a miner ascending a ladder in slow-motion, carrying a bag of mud on shoulders, accompanied by a heavy, pounding music. The effects and the music work together to highlight the miner's tiredness and strain. Other images follow, most of them from the "third world." In each case the focus is not a thing, but a quality.
Powaqqatsi revolutionized my concept of the world -- Go ahead and laugh! The film shows a vastness and variety and energy in the world that was beyond anything I could have imagined when I went into the theater. Everything is presented for what it is; there's no Western narrator to reassure you and tell you what everything means. There is perhaps no higher praise for a film than saying it changed the way I think, and Powaqqatsi deserves that praise.
Powaqqatsi revolutionized my concept of the world -- Go ahead and laugh! The film shows a vastness and variety and energy in the world that was beyond anything I could have imagined when I went into the theater. Everything is presented for what it is; there's no Western narrator to reassure you and tell you what everything means. There is perhaps no higher praise for a film than saying it changed the way I think, and Powaqqatsi deserves that praise.
I saw Koyaanisqatsi several times in the late eighties and was truly mesmerized. After that Powaqqatsi was a true disappointment. I didn't understand it, to be honest.
Many years later I bought the DVDs and saw them both recently. I still like Koyaanisqatsi, even if it couldn't meet my great expectations. But now Powaqqatsi emerged as a true beauty!
I find the photography and music far superior to that of Koyaanisqatsi. Real people, instead of land- and cityscapes (even if wonderful). Some of the Powaqqatsi scenes are simply breathtaking. African women in clear red cloth against the desert sand, the introductory (horrible) scene from the Brazilian mine, etc, etc.
I strongly recommend all those that were utterly disappointed 10 years ago to see Powaqqatsi again!
Many years later I bought the DVDs and saw them both recently. I still like Koyaanisqatsi, even if it couldn't meet my great expectations. But now Powaqqatsi emerged as a true beauty!
I find the photography and music far superior to that of Koyaanisqatsi. Real people, instead of land- and cityscapes (even if wonderful). Some of the Powaqqatsi scenes are simply breathtaking. African women in clear red cloth against the desert sand, the introductory (horrible) scene from the Brazilian mine, etc, etc.
I strongly recommend all those that were utterly disappointed 10 years ago to see Powaqqatsi again!
This film is, according to its director, a look at a "global culture"; a visual assessment of the response of the "third world" to the force of globalization and the pressure to modernize. He says there are both good points and bad points to be observed, and hopes to portray the creativity and industriousness with which people around the world respond to the demands of their environments.
I do not see this. I see a moving, and beautiful film, but not about this. I see the destructive effects of the ever-increasing commodification of nature, life, and labor, on people as they are forced to abandon their homes and livelihoods to nationalist projects and capital ventures. I see (to use Karl Polanyi's words) the uprooting of peoples and places, and the destructive forces of market enterprise disguised under tropes of progress and modernity.
Yes. Human beings are creative and industrious, and have dealt with these problems in unique and fascinating ways. But, rather than simply celebrating the Beauty of Human Life, in all it's glory, let this film be a call to recognize this beauty, and recognize its value as intrinsic, as part and parcel to the livelihoods of the people it is embodied within.
I do not see this. I see a moving, and beautiful film, but not about this. I see the destructive effects of the ever-increasing commodification of nature, life, and labor, on people as they are forced to abandon their homes and livelihoods to nationalist projects and capital ventures. I see (to use Karl Polanyi's words) the uprooting of peoples and places, and the destructive forces of market enterprise disguised under tropes of progress and modernity.
Yes. Human beings are creative and industrious, and have dealt with these problems in unique and fascinating ways. But, rather than simply celebrating the Beauty of Human Life, in all it's glory, let this film be a call to recognize this beauty, and recognize its value as intrinsic, as part and parcel to the livelihoods of the people it is embodied within.
As mentioned earlier by others, this film is basically a weaker
version of Baraka (by Koyaanisqatsi cinematographer Ron Fricke),
a film very much like Powaqqatsi, focussing some more on the
religious rituals of southern hemisphere cultures.
Powaqqatsi definitely is a disappointment as a follow up of
Koyaanisqatsi. There is no consistence of any kind. Some scenes
are going on for way too long (the gold mine sequence in the Serra
Pelada, Brazil is nice but becomes tiresome already before the
main title). Other sequences are uneven and cluttered and we
don't know where we are. The movie is almost entirely overcranked (in slow motion), as
opposed to the perfect combination of time lapse (much of it with
motion blur to make it smoother plus smooth camera panning),
slow motion and the use of stock footage in Koyaanisqatsi which
had a wonderful atmosphere to it and works on many levels.
Powaqqatsi is supposed to make no statement about how things
should be - according to director Godfrey Reggio. Why then the
sequence editing US American tv commercials and military
images (is this evidence of how Reggio felt about Powaq. not
coming close to Koyaanis. in meaning)?
Powaq.'s photography is of great quality, yet many motifs are
simply not interesting enough to be on screen for that long. I have
the feeling that the team simply didn't come home with enough
interesting footage in the can and had to make something out of
what they had in the editing room. The few great shots which lets
us emerge in unfamiliar worlds don't make up for the higher
percentage of footage of no interest whatsoever.
Check Ron Fricke's "Baraka" to see what Powaqqatsi could have
been and should have been.
I also agree about some comments regarding Philip Glass' score.
It is sometimes is flat out corny and sounds very much like what
one might expect in a late 1980s "we are all one world" beer or
cookie commercial. Philip Glass is a great and original composer for symphonic
minimalism, but as a composer of world music he hasn't got the
vein. The Powaq. score is several notches below the magic of
what he did for Koyaanis. Again: Baraka has a better score as well.
Watch Powaqqatsi to ifill yourself in on the second installment of
the ..qatsi trilogy. It's not a bad film, but IMHO Godfrey Reggio was
unable to deliver the footage for this concept. Ron Fricke did it in
"Baraka".
version of Baraka (by Koyaanisqatsi cinematographer Ron Fricke),
a film very much like Powaqqatsi, focussing some more on the
religious rituals of southern hemisphere cultures.
Powaqqatsi definitely is a disappointment as a follow up of
Koyaanisqatsi. There is no consistence of any kind. Some scenes
are going on for way too long (the gold mine sequence in the Serra
Pelada, Brazil is nice but becomes tiresome already before the
main title). Other sequences are uneven and cluttered and we
don't know where we are. The movie is almost entirely overcranked (in slow motion), as
opposed to the perfect combination of time lapse (much of it with
motion blur to make it smoother plus smooth camera panning),
slow motion and the use of stock footage in Koyaanisqatsi which
had a wonderful atmosphere to it and works on many levels.
Powaqqatsi is supposed to make no statement about how things
should be - according to director Godfrey Reggio. Why then the
sequence editing US American tv commercials and military
images (is this evidence of how Reggio felt about Powaq. not
coming close to Koyaanis. in meaning)?
Powaq.'s photography is of great quality, yet many motifs are
simply not interesting enough to be on screen for that long. I have
the feeling that the team simply didn't come home with enough
interesting footage in the can and had to make something out of
what they had in the editing room. The few great shots which lets
us emerge in unfamiliar worlds don't make up for the higher
percentage of footage of no interest whatsoever.
Check Ron Fricke's "Baraka" to see what Powaqqatsi could have
been and should have been.
I also agree about some comments regarding Philip Glass' score.
It is sometimes is flat out corny and sounds very much like what
one might expect in a late 1980s "we are all one world" beer or
cookie commercial. Philip Glass is a great and original composer for symphonic
minimalism, but as a composer of world music he hasn't got the
vein. The Powaq. score is several notches below the magic of
what he did for Koyaanis. Again: Baraka has a better score as well.
Watch Powaqqatsi to ifill yourself in on the second installment of
the ..qatsi trilogy. It's not a bad film, but IMHO Godfrey Reggio was
unable to deliver the footage for this concept. Ron Fricke did it in
"Baraka".
Did you know
- TriviaThe opening images are of the Serra Pelada goldmines in Brazil.
- SoundtracksOpus
Written by Patrick Disanto
Performed by 9
Courtesy of number9ine Records, USA, A Division of Polydor Records
Under License from number9ine Special Markets
all rights reserved IDP, BMI publishing, 1986.
- How long is Powaqqatsi?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Languages
- Also known as
- North South
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $2,500,000 (estimated)
- Gross US & Canada
- $589,244
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $27,899
- May 1, 1988
- Gross worldwide
- $592,592
- Runtime
- 1h 39m(99 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content