IMDb RATING
6.9/10
1.6K
YOUR RATING
A surreal period film following a university professor and his eerie nomad friend as they go through loose romantic triangles and face death in peculiar ways.A surreal period film following a university professor and his eerie nomad friend as they go through loose romantic triangles and face death in peculiar ways.A surreal period film following a university professor and his eerie nomad friend as they go through loose romantic triangles and face death in peculiar ways.
- Awards
- 17 wins & 7 nominations total
Michiyo Yasuda
- Shûko Aochi
- (as Michiyo Ohkusu)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Suzuki is generally known for his outrageous, eye-popping imagery. I think his films actually contain a lot of depth and are great besides that imagery, but I know it's the visuals that bring him his fame. This film, independently produced after a long hiatus from film-making, is a different kind of Suzuki. A VERY different Suzuki. Zigeunerweisen, named after a musical composition that plays a couple of times during the film and a record of which plays an important part of the plot, is a rather slowly paced art film, a very long one at that, with an almost European feeling. There are a few striking images in its two and a half hours (most notably a woman licking a man's eyeball), but it isn't the phantasmagoria of Suzuki's earlier films, or his later films. The dialogue is often weird and poetic. My favorite line was "You caress me as if sucking my very bones." The film takes place during the Taisho period, which occurred after the Meiji Restoration during the 20s and 30s. It is a period marked by further Westernization and a loss of traditional values (I might be wrong, but I think Oshima's In the Realm of the Senses is set during the same period). The story involves two friends, a professor and a vagabond, and their relationships with their wives, as well as a geisha they once met on a vacation. There isn't too much story, per se. The vagabond marries a woman who looks identical to the geisha, but doesn't stay faithful, or even at home. The film is mostly told from the point of view of the professor (played by Toshiya Fujita, the director of Lady Snowblood). Like I said, the film is very deliberately paced. It was hard to stay interested at times. But the movie moves toward a mysterious and haunting finale. I don't think I get it, but I found the whole film intriguing, at least. Not my favorite Suzuki by a long shot, but maybe I'll understand it better on a subsequent viewing (which probably won't happen for a long while).
A surreal period film following a university professor (Toshiya Fujita) and his eerie nomad friend (Yoshio Harada) as they go through loose romantic triangles and face death in peculiar ways.
Director Seijun Suzuki was terminated from his contract with Nikkatsu Studios in 1968 for making "movies that make no sense and no money" (specifically "Branded to Kill") and was subsequently blacklisted. In the following years he conversed frequently with his crew at his home and continued developing ideas for new projects. Suzuki's blacklisting ended with the release of his critically and commercially unsuccessful 1977 film "A Tale of Sorrow and Sadness". But it was "Zigeunerweisen" that brought him lasting acclaim.
You might wonder, why does a Japanese film have a German title? Well, "Zigeunerweisen" (also known as "Gypsy Airs") is a musical composition for violin and orchestra written in 1878 by Pablo de Sarasate, based on themes of the Roma people. This composition provided the title and much of the soundtrack for Seijun Suzuki's film. Indeed, the concept of wandering is intrinsic to the plot.
But this is less about plot and more about dreamlike imagery. There are many strange visuals. Not outright bizarre, but some things bordering on performance art. One scene, for example, has two men buried in the sand beating each other with rods. Why is this necessary? It isn't, but is all a part of what makes the film memorable.
"Zigeunerweisen" was a surprise success in Japan, both commercially and critically; it took home the Japanese Academy Awards for best picture, director, and supporting actress, and the prestigious Kinema Jumpo awards for best director, film, screenplay, actress, and supporting actress. Suzuki was not just back, he was finally recognized as a real treasure. This success naturally lead to future films, and this became the first part of Suzuki's Taishō Roman Trilogy, followed by "Kagero-za" (1981) and "Yumeji" (1991). Not sequels or a trilogy in a strict sense, they are each surrealistic psychological dramas and ghost stories linked by style, themes and the Taishō period (1912-1926) setting.
In North America, Kino International released a DVD edition of the film in 2006. It features a 25-minute interview with Suzuki discussing the making of the Taishō Roman Trilogy, a biography and filmography of the same, the theatrical trailer and a gallery of promotional material and photographs. The Arrow Video Blu-ray brings these features along for the ride. On top of that, they offer a high-definition presentation and a new introduction to the film by critic Tony Rayns.
Director Seijun Suzuki was terminated from his contract with Nikkatsu Studios in 1968 for making "movies that make no sense and no money" (specifically "Branded to Kill") and was subsequently blacklisted. In the following years he conversed frequently with his crew at his home and continued developing ideas for new projects. Suzuki's blacklisting ended with the release of his critically and commercially unsuccessful 1977 film "A Tale of Sorrow and Sadness". But it was "Zigeunerweisen" that brought him lasting acclaim.
You might wonder, why does a Japanese film have a German title? Well, "Zigeunerweisen" (also known as "Gypsy Airs") is a musical composition for violin and orchestra written in 1878 by Pablo de Sarasate, based on themes of the Roma people. This composition provided the title and much of the soundtrack for Seijun Suzuki's film. Indeed, the concept of wandering is intrinsic to the plot.
But this is less about plot and more about dreamlike imagery. There are many strange visuals. Not outright bizarre, but some things bordering on performance art. One scene, for example, has two men buried in the sand beating each other with rods. Why is this necessary? It isn't, but is all a part of what makes the film memorable.
"Zigeunerweisen" was a surprise success in Japan, both commercially and critically; it took home the Japanese Academy Awards for best picture, director, and supporting actress, and the prestigious Kinema Jumpo awards for best director, film, screenplay, actress, and supporting actress. Suzuki was not just back, he was finally recognized as a real treasure. This success naturally lead to future films, and this became the first part of Suzuki's Taishō Roman Trilogy, followed by "Kagero-za" (1981) and "Yumeji" (1991). Not sequels or a trilogy in a strict sense, they are each surrealistic psychological dramas and ghost stories linked by style, themes and the Taishō period (1912-1926) setting.
In North America, Kino International released a DVD edition of the film in 2006. It features a 25-minute interview with Suzuki discussing the making of the Taishō Roman Trilogy, a biography and filmography of the same, the theatrical trailer and a gallery of promotional material and photographs. The Arrow Video Blu-ray brings these features along for the ride. On top of that, they offer a high-definition presentation and a new introduction to the film by critic Tony Rayns.
I understand 1980s japan liked it.
I understand most people on here like it 10/10 and such.
I dont really care about why it's a German name or any of the factiods on the Wikipedia page.
I enjoyed it as an experience, but the story was kinda vague. If you're gonna watch this appreciate it as you would a painting. But don't watch this for the story.
I understand most people on here like it 10/10 and such.
I dont really care about why it's a German name or any of the factiods on the Wikipedia page.
I enjoyed it as an experience, but the story was kinda vague. If you're gonna watch this appreciate it as you would a painting. But don't watch this for the story.
The film follows the relationship between two men in early middle age. One is a prim university professor and the other is some sort of "wild man" masculine archetype.
Like in Rouroni Kenshin, the time period for this film is one where the modern Japan and the traditional Japan were clashing, at least in fashion choices. The professor dresses in formal European attire, while the wild man is invariable seen in an ominous black kimono.
Yet the archetypes they represent are universal, not specifically Japanese. The professor, unemotional and flabberghasted into silence at the sight of anything out of the ordinary, is reserved and inhibited, representing civilization. The wild man goes about the world following his whims, getting involved sexually with a bevy of women and doing anything he can to satiate his curiosity. In conversation he is open, apparently always expressing whatever emotion-tinged crazy ideas come into his mind and running with them. Yet are they really so crazy? We see much of the unspoken thoughts that reside in all of our minds in his dialogues. He simply does not have the filter to keep them back.
It's too surreal to effectively convey its message, if indeed it has any message at all, but it's effective at creating a certain ambiance. Although the professor doesn't show himself to be very moved, we are enthralled by the wild man's antics that leave a trail of broken hearts and destruction in their wake. Whether he's manhandling women, speaking glibly about death, or simply sitting there in his striking black cape and eyepatch, we are always interested in discovering what outrageous thing he will do next.
Honourable Mentions: The Great Santini (1979). Robert Duvall tried to embody the quintessential male in his ageing marine in this film, but it came up short. Santini is rough and wild in his own way, but he lacks the mystique and outlandish outrageousness of Nagasako, still very much trapped in convention and thus not as interesting.
Like in Rouroni Kenshin, the time period for this film is one where the modern Japan and the traditional Japan were clashing, at least in fashion choices. The professor dresses in formal European attire, while the wild man is invariable seen in an ominous black kimono.
Yet the archetypes they represent are universal, not specifically Japanese. The professor, unemotional and flabberghasted into silence at the sight of anything out of the ordinary, is reserved and inhibited, representing civilization. The wild man goes about the world following his whims, getting involved sexually with a bevy of women and doing anything he can to satiate his curiosity. In conversation he is open, apparently always expressing whatever emotion-tinged crazy ideas come into his mind and running with them. Yet are they really so crazy? We see much of the unspoken thoughts that reside in all of our minds in his dialogues. He simply does not have the filter to keep them back.
It's too surreal to effectively convey its message, if indeed it has any message at all, but it's effective at creating a certain ambiance. Although the professor doesn't show himself to be very moved, we are enthralled by the wild man's antics that leave a trail of broken hearts and destruction in their wake. Whether he's manhandling women, speaking glibly about death, or simply sitting there in his striking black cape and eyepatch, we are always interested in discovering what outrageous thing he will do next.
Honourable Mentions: The Great Santini (1979). Robert Duvall tried to embody the quintessential male in his ageing marine in this film, but it came up short. Santini is rough and wild in his own way, but he lacks the mystique and outlandish outrageousness of Nagasako, still very much trapped in convention and thus not as interesting.
I never thought I would say this about a Seijun Suzuki film, but my god was this boring. For starters, its meandering story told at a snail's pace should have been about an hour shorter. It often felt surreal just for the sake of being surreal, e.g. The trio of beggars with bizarre affectations singing their raunchy songs, the eyeball licking, etc. Other times it was just banal, with conversations that seemed pointless to me. It is marginally better in its final half hour, but that's not saying much. I never felt cohesion or a payoff that warranted all of the silliness, and this is not one I'd care to sit through again.
Did you know
- TriviaThe mysterious, ghost-like voice that can be faintly heard on the soundtrack during the playing of Pablo de Sarasate's 1904 recording of his own 1878 composition, Zigeunerweisen (which gives this film its title), and which the film's characters comment upon at great length, is not a fabrication of the filmmakers. On the original recording, at about 3 minutes and 25 seconds, a voice can be heard speaking rapidly for about two seconds. The two main characters in the film have no idea what the voice is saying and it intrigues them. However, according to a biography of the violinist-composer Efrem Zimbalist Sr. (father of the famous film and television actor), Sarasate was actually "instructing his accompanist to cut the slow section" of the composition, presumably to accommodate the limited recording time of the disk.
- How long is Zigeunerweisen?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Zigeunerweisen
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content