Frida, nature vivante

Frida was an excellent movie to watch. I think many viewers interesting in watching a historical film would be pleased with this film because it has great way of showing different images that represented her life. This movie also recaptures and displays the life of a woman named Frida Kahlo. Frida played the role of a strong and independent individual who displayed her life through art. Throughout her life she suffers from a profound identity crisis. She suffered from severe health conditions to conflicts with her marriage(Diego Rivera). Her life was nothing but sorrow. Therefore, she had loved to display her pain and suffrage in most of her paintings. Her style in art is what made the movie so intense. Even though, the movie did not consist of much dialogue, each image in the movie had a great impact on the significance of her life.

Not knowing the history and something about the life of Frida, this film is not understandable by anyone. It reflects the life of Frida Kahlo, a famous Mexican painter, more famous because of her political position and her love and relationships with painter of mural like Diego Rivera and political person as Liev Trostky. The main characteristic of the film is the lack of dialogues, so, again, not knowing the history it will be difficult to understand the plot. In a scene one may hear the voice of Trostky in French giving the message to Frida, where he invited her to have love and sex with him. In another one there is a bitter dialogue among Trostky, Rivera and Frida, where Trostky speaks in Russian through a woman-translator (the Russian language here is the worst of the world, badly pronounced as if Trostky was not Russian). It is clear that Mexican communists at that time were loyal to Stalin and organized the plots to kill Trostky. The other famous Mexican painter of mural, Alfaro Siqueiros, was against Trostky and behaves as a terrorist.

The life of Frida was abnormal in general, she was a lover of several men and also a lesbian one; she suffered her problems with legs and the problems of the Mexican society. Frida's character was complex and the film reflected it well.

Anyone interested in see this film should in anticipation read about Mexico's history and the major events of the early 20th Century.

I bought this one while I was in Mexico, still trying to calm down the excitement over seeing Frida's house. I wouldn't compare it to the Hollywood version of Frida because, while both of them are excellent, Naturaleza viva adds something very authentic, very very Frida-like to the story. I agree, this movie is probably not for those not familiar with Frida's biography or the political events that took place during her lifetime. My favorite part was definitely the producer's ability to capture Frida's pain - the driving force of her entire existence. Ofelia Medina portrays Frida the way she was. Bold, unbreakable and, probably, somewhat insane. Like all artists. The movie is less dramatic than its Hollywood counterpart, but it succeeds in immortalizing Frida's personality. There's no need for a better-developed plot because, really, this film is about Frida the thinker, the artist, the lover. It's a window into her mind.

I have watched Salma Hayek's movie before this one, so at the beginning I thought it was a terrible movie. When I was half way through it I changed my mind. Few words are spoken in this movie and many scenes are unrelated, and it was intentionally made this way. It doesn't want to provide us with a lot of information about Frida, Diego Rivera and Mexico at the time, but rather show us Frida's feelings in different situations; how she loved her father, wanted to have a baby,became tremendously happy when receiving the painting colors in the hospital etc.. The music helps us to understand and apprehend these feelings. Yet her character is poorly represented and so is her relationship with her husband. We see here every once in a while in somebody's else's arms, flirting with Trotsky and kissing some lady, but I really don't understand why. The movie was also a little bit boring. I give it 5 out of 10.

Frida (1986)

If you manage to find this somewhere (I got my DVD on ebay) you'll see why the actress playing Frida is something of a small legend for her role. Ofelia Medina as the adult Kahlo is quite astonishing, highly believable, and often so Kahlo-like you have to remind yourself this isn't a documentary. She acting.

In fact, the whole movie is convincing in its realism even though it is not especially a "good" movie in other ways. What it lacks mostly is some kind of narrative drive. I don't mean you have to make up a fictional story line, certainly not with someone as amazing as Frida Kahlo, but there has to be something to keep the propulsion going. At the end she dies, and at the beginning she is young and being assessed with a childhood disease, but between it is a series of important things that happened to the artist.

So what you have is a collection of particular moments that really work--the accident aftermath is gruesome and terrifying, the final arrival in her bed at the exhibition is exhilarating--mixed with atmospheric filler, including lots of scenes of people playing music.

One surprising element all along is all the singing, including by Kahlo and even by Rivera. At one point they even have a comic operatic duet as they sing back and forth, quite hilarious and perhaps in keeping with two people filled with life. At times you might think the movie is a musical, but overall it's a low-budget, sincere, genuine feeling biopic. It's that genuine-ness that makes it worth the trip to ebay. Mexico comes across as the real deal, colorful and peppered with what seem like amateur actors, and filmed not in fancied up rooms and courtyards but simple, honest locations.

One of the revelations of this "Frida" is how the more famous 2002 "Frida" looks overly perfect, truly "Hollywood" in its slick, beautiful, colorful rendering of the same subject. Some of the scenes are so similar you realize that this earlier Mexican "Frida" was the template for the later American one (the Trotsky scenes in particular). Certainly the American one is better made and is easier to watch, and will move you. This Mexican one is more a corrective, a realization about who Frida really might have been, and about the falseness of even very good movies.