[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Les Pirates du métro

Original title: The Taking of Pelham One Two Three
  • 1974
  • Tous publics
  • 1h 44m
IMDb RATING
7.6/10
39K
YOUR RATING
POPULARITY
4,155
1,322
Les Pirates du métro (1974)
In New York, armed men hijack a subway car and demand a ransom for the passengers. Even if it's paid, how could they get away?
Play trailer2:27
1 Video
99+ Photos
CaperDark ComedyActionCrimeThriller

Four armed men hijack a New York City subway car and demand a ransom for the passengers. The city's police are faced with a conundrum: Even if it's paid, how could they get away?Four armed men hijack a New York City subway car and demand a ransom for the passengers. The city's police are faced with a conundrum: Even if it's paid, how could they get away?Four armed men hijack a New York City subway car and demand a ransom for the passengers. The city's police are faced with a conundrum: Even if it's paid, how could they get away?

  • Director
    • Joseph Sargent
  • Writers
    • John Godey
    • Peter Stone
  • Stars
    • Walter Matthau
    • Robert Shaw
    • Martin Balsam
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    7.6/10
    39K
    YOUR RATING
    POPULARITY
    4,155
    1,322
    • Director
      • Joseph Sargent
    • Writers
      • John Godey
      • Peter Stone
    • Stars
      • Walter Matthau
      • Robert Shaw
      • Martin Balsam
    • 253User reviews
    • 130Critic reviews
    • 68Metascore
  • See production info at IMDbPro
    • Nominated for 2 BAFTA Awards
      • 3 nominations total

    Videos1

    Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:27
    Official Trailer

    Photos116

    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    + 111
    View Poster

    Top cast77

    Edit
    Walter Matthau
    Walter Matthau
    • Lt. Garber
    Robert Shaw
    Robert Shaw
    • Blue
    Martin Balsam
    Martin Balsam
    • Green
    Hector Elizondo
    Hector Elizondo
    • Grey
    Earl Hindman
    Earl Hindman
    • Brown
    James Broderick
    James Broderick
    • Denny Doyle
    Dick O'Neill
    Dick O'Neill
    • Correll
    Lee Wallace
    Lee Wallace
    • The Mayor
    Tom Pedi
    Tom Pedi
    • Caz Dolowicz
    Beatrice Winde
    • Mrs. Jenkins
    Jerry Stiller
    Jerry Stiller
    • Lt. Rico Patrone
    Nathan George
    Nathan George
    • Ptl. James
    Rudy Bond
    Rudy Bond
    • Police Commissioner
    Kenneth McMillan
    Kenneth McMillan
    • Borough Commander
    • (as Kenneth Mc Millan)
    Doris Roberts
    Doris Roberts
    • Mayor's Wife
    Julius Harris
    Julius Harris
    • Inspector Daniels
    Cynthia Belgrave
    • The Maid
    Anna Berger
    Anna Berger
    • The Mother
    • Director
      • Joseph Sargent
    • Writers
      • John Godey
      • Peter Stone
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews253

    7.639.4K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    8GregCnAZ-1

    My favorite crime drama of the '70s. Maybe ever.

    With all the other plot summaries written here, I won't go into what this film is all about. I just want to say that I don't believe this genre has been done better, either before or since. I first saw "Pelham 1,2,3" when I was 14 at a drive-in theater in Northern CA. It holds a memorable place for me as the first R rated movie I ever saw, as well as the first time I ever heard the "F" word in a movie. But way beyond that, I was so completely sucked into the story even at my young age. Now all these years later, I still am. I own the movie and must see it periodically. I'm so glad, reading all the other user comments, to find that I'm just one of many who absolutely love this film. Walter Matthau, Robert Shaw, Martin Balsam, and the rest of the cast are all brilliant. The comedy in the film is also outstanding and never out of place within the storyline. It simply serves to make the film more realistic. And last but not least, David Shire's score is the coolest. I only wish they had put a soundtrack out for this film. When I watch this movie, the music must be cranked.

    Don't bother catching this film on TV. It's always completely hacked up. Rent it or buy the DVD. It will remind you just how much fun movies used to be.
    8Xstal

    The Best Laid Plans...

    A subway train is hijacked by armed gang, Mr. Blue's the boss, he has an English twang, there's also Grey and Brown and Green, in car one they all convene, uncoupling the rest, that leaves eighteen. A dialogue begins, with those up top, Lt. Garber is a New York transit cop, who's informed by Mr. Blue, of the ransom they pursue, one million dollars is the price for hostage swap.

    Still a wonderful piece of filmmaking, Robert Shaw perfectly cast as Mr. Blue, the exchanges between him and Walter Matthau as Garber outstanding, all encompassed in a more than believable story that travels without interruption, all the way to the end of the line.
    9greenforest56

    film student's action picture

    There are many disappointing action pictures out there – this is not one of them. The genius of the film is there is no wasted motion. The picture starts right with the plot – no introduction or character development. The characters are allowed to develop as the plot moves along.

    Which brings us to pacing – the pacing in this picture is excellent. It moves right along and never stops, never slows, never goes too fast. This is the strongest element of its success.

    Another strength is its economy of motion. Many action pictures bore us with unneeded car chase scenes, shoot-em-ups, explosions and other mayhems that are used as filler when true creativity comes up short. This film needs none of that. Only that which is necessary is shown. Only that which needs speaking is spoken. This film is deftly written and crafted with great economy and this underpins the excellent pacing. It moves right along because there is no wasted motion as there is in most other action pictures.

    This does not mean there is no action, there is fabulous action, but only such action as is necessary to move the plot along. There is no action simply to occupy time until the requisite 90 minutes are up.

    The directing is equally economical. No fancy shots, shaky cameras, or special effects – just good, straight forward directing.

    I doubt this picture could be made today for the above reasons. The script readers would reject it for 'lack of development'; 'not enough action'; 'no romantic interest'; and all the other brainless formulas script readers dole out. The producers would demand 'more action' and 'camera work' from the directors. And, of course, a romantic interest (in some state of undress) would have to be shoe horned in.

    Film students should study this picture. From it they will learn that brevity is a virtue and mindless formulas are just that - mindless.
    bob the moo

    Classic 70's thriller with a edge of comedy

    A group of criminals highjack a subway train and demand $1 million from New York City. Transit cop, Lt. Garber tries to work the situation out, but it seems the gang have planned everything to the second and are running the show. Garber tries to get one step ahead of the gang.

    Of course now everyone knows this film because of the supposed connection to Reservoir Dogs, in that the criminals are colour coded instead of names. However even without this cult reference this film deserves to be watched and enjoyed. The story exists on two levels. First we have the setup – it also acknowledges that it is the usual disaster movie setup….the majority of characters are listed in the credits as stereotypes instead of people (ie, `the pimp' `the junkie' etc). However this is not a weakness as the thriller story is solid enough to carry the film. It isn't all action but it's very tense and interesting. What really tops it off is the thick vein of humour that runs through it – mostly coming from Matthau.

    Matthau shows how wonderful he is and how he manages to do well in so many different film styles. His world-weary act is great and his Brooklyn accent is pushed to the fore. Roberts Shaw is also good, but has less of a character and is working hard to sound English. The cast is actually deep in faces – we have an almost unrecognisable Elizondo, Woody Allen actor Tony Roberts, a fantastic Mayor from Wallace and Jerry Stiller (Ben's dad), who doesn't look much older today than he did then!

    Overall this is very enjoyable, but it is made by Matthau. The thriller plot stands up well despite the lack of modern fireworks. A cult classic in the making.
    8M_Brown

    This was meant to be Carry On At Your Convenience...

    ... Thank Goodness it wasn't!

    I switched on me TV last night after an evening out and the opening credits of Pelham was just finishing. Not knowing the name of this film (the Carry On listing was clearly not being shown, perhaps the Producer-dude had a revelation of taste!) I began to watch it half-heartedly, whilst prostrate on the sofa.

    By the end of the movie, and that glorious last look from Matthau, I was sitting blot-upright with the biggest grin I've had on my face at 2am for a long time!

    What a flick! What a film! How good was this simple, little, under-rated, under-stated movie? Very.

    See this film, forgive it for being written in the 70-ties, in fact revel in that non-PC fact (the Chinese/Lady jokes are, retrospectively, quite amusing, in a non-Carry On way).

    They just don't make 'um like this anymore. Simple, sweet, suspense.

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Trivia
      In a TVO (Ontario, Canada) interview, the producer said that this film did terrific box office in New York, Toronto, London and Paris--all cities with subways--but was considered a flop in the rest of the world.
    • Goofs
      The relevant section of the Lexington Avenue Line includes curves sharp enough to have speed-controlled signals. As Mr. Green would have known, these cannot be cleared to green in advance of the train's arrival and will not clear if it is running away.
    • Quotes

      Lt. Garber: [looking for the inspector] Inspector Daniels?

      Inspector Daniels: [identifying himself] Daniels.

      Lt. Garber: [realizing that Inspector Daniels is Black] Oh, I, uh, thought you were, uh, like a shorter guy or... I don't know what I thought.

    • Crazy credits
      Although many of the scenes in this film were taken on transit property, the New York City Transit Authority is not responsible for plot, story and characters portrayed. The Authority did not render technical advice and assistance.
    • Connections
      Edited into Superman III (1983)

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    FAQ22

    • How long is The Taking of Pelham One Two Three?Powered by Alexa
    • Why are the passengers specifically designated in the credits but not in the movie itself?
    • What is 'The Taking of Pelham One Two Three' about?
    • Is "The Taking of Pelham" based on a book?

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • February 28, 1975 (France)
    • Country of origin
      • United States
    • Languages
      • English
      • Spanish
    • Also known as
      • El tomar de Pelham uno dos tres
    • Filming locations
      • Gracie Mansion, Manhattan, New York City, New York, USA(mayor's home - exteriors)
    • Production companies
      • Palomar Pictures International
      • Palladium Productions
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Box office

    Edit
    • Budget
      • $5,000,000 (estimated)
    • Gross worldwide
      • $357
    See detailed box office info on IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      • 1h 44m(104 min)
    • Color
      • Color
    • Sound mix
      • Mono
    • Aspect ratio
      • 2.35 : 1

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.