Chorus (1974):
Brief Review -
Mrinal Sen's neo-realistic take on unemployment and its devastating consequences. Metropolis (1927) was a legendary film on employment, though its sci-fi touch took it to another level, far from realism. A few German films of the 1920s also addressed unemployment with striking realism for their time. Bengali master Mrinal Sen's Chorus feels like those films but arrived five decades later. Yet, it still leaves an impact-here's why. The 70s were ruled by masala films, which audiences preferred over serious cinema. Much like Sullivan's Travels (1941), people wanted escape from their problems rather than reminders. Chorus, however, was meaningful cinema, aimed more at critics than moviegoers of that era. The film is a metaphorical take on unemployment and its unwanted glory. New Gods decide to end joblessness, and thousands gather at the office. The chaos worsens the situation instead of solving it. Soon, a massive march begins-speaking of unity, demands, jobs, and rights. As expected, many fail and movements collapse. Yet, 30,000 people remain firm, shaking the city and leaving industrialists baffled. They dismiss the number as unreal-but what if they actually face such masses? That's the hard-hitting question Sen raises. Sadly, the film lacks grip and narrative clarity. Its structure feels confusing, and the neo-realistic climax makes it harder for general audiences. Still, the parallel cinema spirit here is praiseworthy. Sen was never an ordinary filmmaker; he turned simple stories into extraordinary art with his vision and craft. Chorus may not appeal to everyone, but for those who value this kind of cinema, it's a must-watch. Thankfully, the film came before Emergency.
RATING - 6/10*
By - #samthebestet.
