IMDb RATING
5.7/10
3.7K
YOUR RATING
An American couple in England stumble upon a rambling mansion where a number of powerful individuals have been summoned by its patriarch regarding the home's legacy.An American couple in England stumble upon a rambling mansion where a number of powerful individuals have been summoned by its patriarch regarding the home's legacy.An American couple in England stumble upon a rambling mansion where a number of powerful individuals have been summoned by its patriarch regarding the home's legacy.
Featured reviews
This movie doesn't seem to compare to the horror movies of today but I remember really liking this film when it came out. It may have been considered much better back when the film was released. I had read the book first when it came out before seeing the film and thought it was fantastic. I found it to be a great story and played very well in my mind. Though most seem to have a complaint about the special effects/ cheesiness of the film. I think they fair well in the time frame that the movie was made, plus to this day the swimming pool scene still gives me a chill. If the special effects don't work for you try reading the book and see if your imagination doesn't bring this story to life for you. I gave it an 7 because I felt it was a good solid movie and that is what I would have rated it back in 1978.
Interior decorator Katharine Ross and boyfriend Sam Elliot are offered a plum assignment in England. When they are run off the road by an enigmatic millionaire, he invites them to stay at his family castle while their motorcycle is repaired...and then the fun begins. The film can be taken as either a straight horror film or an Agatha Christie-style supernatural mystery. There is not much in the way of genuine surprises, but it is interesting figuring out which of the guests at the English estate will be the next to go and how. Ross and Elliot play their roles believably as a suitably bewildered American couple, who cannot understand how they got stuck in this predicament and how the heck to get out of it. The cast is made up of solid, familiar British actors and the cinematography lends a polish that helps this film rise above the usual dreck in this genre. While not edge-of-your-seat, the film moves along briskly and there is just enough gruesomeness to add to the atmosphere. Aside from the leads, Margaret Tyzack is particularly effective as a sinister nurse. Richard Marquand's direction is above-average and he deftly showcases the English countryside, the stately manor and Sam Elliot's birthday suit (THANK YOU, RICHARD!) with equal aplomb.
Enjoyed this film though I've seen this story before. Most of the acting was good, especially Elliott, Ross and Daltrey in a small role. Charles Gray though plays the same role in every part he plays and Hildegard Neil is criminally underused. In all a decent effort.
I'll start by saying, I'm a big fan of this film, and have enjoyed watching it many times over the years. As a teen I can remember this regularly being on The BBC late on a Friday night.
By today's standards of course it's tame as a horror, but look beyond that and it's actually a really clever, very well acted movie.
The story itself is very dark, any film that involved the Devil would be.
I love the village scenes, when Maggie and Pete try to escape in the car but are trapped and always end up back at the house, it's so clever.
It feels very Agatha Christie from the odd, and there are definitely elements of And then there were none, one by one the gathered guests start to die. Unfortunately the film doesn't have the claustrophobia that Agatha Christie had in abundance in her book.
It's looks stunning, that's the films biggest strength, the house looks incredible, Roger Daltrey's own place.
It isn't particularly scary, but it has its moments, I can remember having a few bad dreams about the mirror scene (I was only about 9 or 10.)
I particularly liked Katherine Ross, there was a soft sincerity about her, I also really liked Margaret Tyzack's cat nurse.
It's a very decent film, it creaks in parts, but on the whole it ticks a lot of boxes, I just love the nostalgia.
8/10.
By today's standards of course it's tame as a horror, but look beyond that and it's actually a really clever, very well acted movie.
The story itself is very dark, any film that involved the Devil would be.
I love the village scenes, when Maggie and Pete try to escape in the car but are trapped and always end up back at the house, it's so clever.
It feels very Agatha Christie from the odd, and there are definitely elements of And then there were none, one by one the gathered guests start to die. Unfortunately the film doesn't have the claustrophobia that Agatha Christie had in abundance in her book.
It's looks stunning, that's the films biggest strength, the house looks incredible, Roger Daltrey's own place.
It isn't particularly scary, but it has its moments, I can remember having a few bad dreams about the mirror scene (I was only about 9 or 10.)
I particularly liked Katherine Ross, there was a soft sincerity about her, I also really liked Margaret Tyzack's cat nurse.
It's a very decent film, it creaks in parts, but on the whole it ticks a lot of boxes, I just love the nostalgia.
8/10.
This can't seem to decide if it wants to be a kitch 70s Hammer Horror-em-up, or a glossy romantic US TV movie. Slick moustache man heart throb Sam Elliot clearly thinks he's in the latter, while Roger Daltrey bounds onto the screen like he's auditioning for a part in 'Eastenders: The Pantomime'. To say The Legacy is uneven is putting it mildly, no two characters appear to realise they're in the same film. Shove them all in a grand old mansion in the English countryside, add a touch of supernatural hokum, some surprisingly inventive death scenes, a whole lot of messing around doing nothing, the most pointless random car drive scene in movie history, a cat which has more screen time than half the cast yet has no reason to be involved in the film, and enjoy - but not that much because it drags after an hour or so.
Did you know
- TriviaActor Sam Elliott (Pete Danner) and actress Katharine Ross (Margaret Walsh) met and fell in love when they co-starred in this movie. They married in 1984 and are still together.
- GoofsWhen Sam Elliot's character takes a shower and breaks the glass door to avoid being burned with the hot water, his back gets hurt and bleeds, but when Katharine Ross's character comes into the bathroom, Sam's back is completely clean.
- Quotes
Margaret Walsh: I know. I've got the power.
Pete Danner: Yeah I know you have. Now what are you going to do with it?
Margaret Walsh: Anything I want.
- Alternate versionsUS theatrical cut is 100 min. and British theatrical cut 102 min.
- How long is The Legacy?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- The Legacy
- Filming locations
- Loseley House, Guildford, Surrey, England, UK(Mountolive's Manor House-exterior and interior)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $2,500,000 (estimated)
- Gross US & Canada
- $11,364,985
- Gross worldwide
- $11,364,985
- Runtime
- 1h 42m(102 min)
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content