L'aigle de Shaolin

Proliferate as martial arts flicks have been in cinema over the years, and especially in the 70s and 80s, not all are made equal. Some particular names are so famous and trusted that they easily command respect; titles falling outside the bounds of such exemplars are less certain to be worth our while. Even without taking into account dubbing which more than not tends to be not just awful but altogether painful, there are all too many ways in which a film might fall short, and many have. For better and for worse, scarcely any sooner than it begins one can start to form lasting impressions about 'The invincible armour.' It certainly stands much taller than the worst among some of its brethren; on the other hand, make no mistake that this is certainly no exemplar, and this is nothing one needs to go out of their way to see. It's enjoyable enough if you come across it, but only as something light and frivolous on a lazy day when you want to turn off your brain.

The trouble here is that it's far too easy too tabulate the flaws and shortcomings, and they stack up considerably against the advantages the movie can claim. It's not for nothing that I mention the dubbing, for while this instance isn't the absolute worst I've ever heard, it's surely not far off, and those who provided the voiceovers should frankly be ashamed of themselves. True, this is not a fault of the picture in and of itself, and I can only try not to hold it against filmmaker See-Yuen Ng; it's also conceivable that in addition to dubbing, the original was re-cut or otherwise manipulated in being prepared for markets outside the region. The latter is less likely, however, and one way or another there's no disputing the frailties as we see them. The editing is brusque and overly excitable, and in cases where the footage is sped up, just tawdrily cartoonish; it too often seems like if the camera weren't zooming in or out, it wouldn't be operating at all. The audio is less than pristine, and the effusive use of sound effects becomes tiresome after a point.

Both Ng's direction in general, and the acting specifically, raise a skeptical eyebrow at no few points; there were choices made for some shots and scenes, and for some performances, that simply do not come off well. I recognize that in part some of what comes off as flagrant tackiness can just be chalked up to differences in film-making sensibilities, and indeed there are some discernible commonalities with the more esteemed works of Shaw Brothers, Golden Harvest, or the like - yet even if we accept this, the doing here seems outrageous and dubious beyond reason. Worse yet is Lu Tung's screenplay. It's not that there is no value here; on paper the basic story is solid enough, and there are some good ideas. Yet as it presents the narrative is decidedly thin; even if we grant allowances (that may or may not be deserved) for changes made for international markets, the dialogue and scene writing are often much less than fully convincing. To be honest I just don't think this is very good about elucidating the plot in those key scenes that speak to it most directly.

None of this completely stripes 'The invincible armour' of all possible entertainment, but it's a lot for us viewers to bear, and our favor is necessarily diminished in some capacity. This is terribly unfortunate, because there really is a lot to appreciate here. The filming locations and sets are lovely, and so are the costume design, hair, and makeup. The props and weapons are splendid. Above all, if it's kung fu action you want, it's kung fu action you'll get, and the choreography and stunts here are broadly outstanding. In some examples it may be undercut by the editing or cinematography, but at its best the martial arts on display are wonderfully enticing, or in cases downright beautiful. It may also true that there's not entirely as much action as one would like, but even at that it's unquestionably the core strength of the feature. The visual presentation at large, in fact, is overall terrific.

Ah, but would that the same careful effort that had gone into the stunts and fights, and into the otherwise imagery, had been applied across the board. I see the potential in the writing, but the script is sloppy and flimsy as it is; the direction, acting, cinematography, and editing alike are all overzealous and overcooked. Yes, the display of martial disciplines is fantastic, but if this is the value that this title has to offer, it's not as if we can't get it elsewhere. What, then, is left for us to grasp onto in 'The invincible armour?' I repeat that it's suitably fun for a quiet day, and we get what we came for. Our desires are fulfilled at a cost, though, and there's a lot that just doesn't come off well; this feels longer than it needs to be, and the last twenty minutes are kind of just a dull, overdone slog. It's possible I'm being too harsh; it's also possible I'm being too kind. I do like this 1977 flick, and I'm glad for those who get more out of it; I just firmly suggest keeping your eyes on the prize, and try to abide the adjoining inelegance as best you can.

The 'script' is hilarious. The kicking is awesome. All the men with beards look the same. The love interest is a bit of a minger, and her brother appears to be retarded.

This is by far my favourite kung fu film, and I believe was also sounded endorsed by Quentin Tarantino when he was doing the rounds for Kill Bill 2.

You will laugh, you will go 'oooooh' you will clasp your face with agony at the dire dubbing and acting and YOU WILL ENJOY THIS.

Also, it has a man defeated by an 'iron finger' attack _down there_ if you know what I mean. Nice.

Those elaborate, Shaw Brothers-style period costumes just don't work against a Poverty Row background like the one we see in "Invincible Armor", but hell...why quibble? Hwang Jang Lee and John Liu, two of the top three kickers in the business (the third being Delon Tam, Liu's instructor), tear up the screen in this film and that's what counts. My only complaint about the fight scenes is that there were too many distracting, split-second shots of shattered eggs every time someone attacked what they thought was Hwang's vulnerable point (his testicles, naturally). Just concentrate on the action, guys, please! Otherwise, this is a fun, straightforward flick that you'll enjoy if Hong Kong kung fu cinema is your thing.

If it's starring Hwang Jang Lee your in for a great movie!This one is a great.This movie is starts out with action and it has very little time to spare with corny comedy like on some kung fu movies.The movies plot is ok.For such a great movie though I thought they could have wrote the movie with a little more drama and twists to keep you guessing on who is good and bad!Great fighting styles,Eagle's claw,Iron finger armor,High leg kicks from John Liu.If you like white long haired masters like me... you will like this movie also.The White haired masters one on one near the end what could be better!The end finishes strong which reminds me of the movie Fist of the white lotus somewhat.Hwang Jang Lee was so strong that you could have thrown a ton brick in his face and he would have still been coming to you!Scary!

This has to be the Best martial arts/ Kung Fu movie of the era! It can be hard to follow though so you must pay attention. There are 3 major guys who look alike and have similar sounding names even and then there are 2, 3 or 4 old master types who all look identical and in fact 2 of them are brothers in the film... LOL. I have to rewatch it of course to see if I have exaggerated too much for this review but as far as bad guys go, this bad master is one of the toughest I've seen in these kinds of movies. There are many fight scenes and most of the fighting is pretty realistic if you can suspend your disbelief of course and all are well choreographed.