La revanche d'un homme nommé Cheval
Original title: The Return of a Man Called Horse
- 1976
- Tous publics
- 2h 9m
IMDb RATING
6.1/10
2.2K
YOUR RATING
The English gentleman known as Horse, returns to the American west to save his adopted Indian tribe from extinction.The English gentleman known as Horse, returns to the American west to save his adopted Indian tribe from extinction.The English gentleman known as Horse, returns to the American west to save his adopted Indian tribe from extinction.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
William Lucking
- Tom Gryce
- (as Bill Lucking)
Claudio Brook
- Chemin De Fer
- (as Claudio Brooke)
Pedro Damián
- Standing Bear
- (as Pedro Damian)
Humberto López
- Thin Dog
- (as Humberto Lopez)
Susan Dury
- Lord John's fiancee
- (uncredited)
Rigobert Rico
- Owl
- (uncredited)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
This is a gritty, tremendous sequel, and I would say, better than the first film, from director Elliot Silverstein. Not for the squeamish, it is bloody, realistic in terms of action and battle, fights sequences. I agree that the bad white men and the good Indians was not that new in 1976 film industry - a good thing though - but it doesn't matter for me. Richard Harris is better than ever in this second movie of the franchise. The Indians way of life, daily life is very authentic, and I guess the research for writing was very serious, accurate and that adds much to the power of this film. Among the best westerns dedicated to Indians.
I loved the movie,because it showed the beautiful people,that the American Indians are. They are really, very spiritual people. I lived with a family (who did the dance),for about 4 months and it was by far the most interesting period of my life,so far. I learned a lot from this Wonderful family,I could go on. But my point that I want to make,is I understand why the Richard Harris character returned to help his old family. I have experienced many of the ways of the Indians in modern society. Seeing an Eagle fly,now makes me touch my heart with the knowledge of what it signifies.Their spirituality will touch your heart,IF you let it in.
The first sequel to A Man Called Horse {there was another one a few years later which turned out to be something of a disappointment} is a much more conventional adventure movie. This does not mean it's bad,not at all,in fact it's probably more enjoyable. There's more English language dialogue,The Sioux dialogue is subtitled instead of just being incomprehensible to those who don't know Sioux,and it follows a familiar action movie structure and scenario. It just lacks the originality and edge of the original,where we were exploring an unfamiliar culture and weren't sure all the time if we liked everything about it. Disappontingly,none of the Sioux in the first film appear to return.
Well directed by Irvin Kershner,generally a journeyman director who occasionally excelled himself {i.e.The Empire Strikes Back},it has a fantastic cut early on from violence in the wild west to fox hunting in England,a different kind of savagery. The early scenes do a really good job of showing the film's hero,again well played by Richard Harris,as a man who appears to have everything-a title,a big house,a wife,etc} but inside is empty because he was only truly himself when he was with the Sioux. The first half of the film is leisurely,and has a re-run of the Sun Vow ritual of the first film,but longer and more graphic. But it's essential to the film,especially the vision Harris has of meeting himself as an old man.
The film's second half is mostly conventional if well staged action fare,although Harris looks out of place riding with the Sioux in western clothes-surely he would have dressed like one of them? Laurence Rosenthal's soaring score is wonderful and,in contrast with the more authentic sounding music of the first film,is more evidence that the filmmakers were generally going for a more romanticised approach. On that level,this sometimes rousing follow up works well.
Well directed by Irvin Kershner,generally a journeyman director who occasionally excelled himself {i.e.The Empire Strikes Back},it has a fantastic cut early on from violence in the wild west to fox hunting in England,a different kind of savagery. The early scenes do a really good job of showing the film's hero,again well played by Richard Harris,as a man who appears to have everything-a title,a big house,a wife,etc} but inside is empty because he was only truly himself when he was with the Sioux. The first half of the film is leisurely,and has a re-run of the Sun Vow ritual of the first film,but longer and more graphic. But it's essential to the film,especially the vision Harris has of meeting himself as an old man.
The film's second half is mostly conventional if well staged action fare,although Harris looks out of place riding with the Sioux in western clothes-surely he would have dressed like one of them? Laurence Rosenthal's soaring score is wonderful and,in contrast with the more authentic sounding music of the first film,is more evidence that the filmmakers were generally going for a more romanticised approach. On that level,this sometimes rousing follow up works well.
Good reviews here generally averaging 6 stars out of 10 except for one tortured soul
So I'll cheerfully add this review although upon reading you no doubt find it completely unusable
With our small joyful entourage we saw this as guests of one of the main cast members, as a pre-release screening, I believe it was at the studio in Century City I was delighted to meet the producer Sandy Howard, one of the main cast members Geoff Lewiswas there, other cast members, the reporters were there and also Gale Sondergaard making a comeback after many years (my mother was delighted!)
Great fun, so this is my valuable advice to you--get invited to a preview, you'll feel more important and the movie will be better!
this sequel to A Man Called Horse focuses much more on the spirituality of the Native Indians.i didn't mind that aspect at all.it's very interesting.the problem i had with the movie is there just didn't see to be a point.i didn't feel there was much of a story to it.to me,it felt like they made a sequel just for the sake a making a sequel.the first movie had much more thought put into it.i did really like the musical score,though.i thought it was very majestic and poetic.if you're expecting a lot of action,you'll have to look elsewhere.this isn't that kind of picture.adding everything up,i liked the first movie more.but this one isn't so bad.for me,Return of a Man called Horse is a 5/10
Did you know
- TriviaOn account of this film, which George Lucas found to be better than its predecessor, he hired Irvin Kershner to direct L'Empire contre-attaque (1980).
- GoofsDuring the sun ceremony, John Morgan (Richard Harris) didn't have any scarring from the first time he underwent the ritual from five years earlier in the original film "A Man Called Horse".
- Alternate versionsGerman VHS version was cut in the scene where Harris makes a fire on the man who followed him.
- ConnectionsFollowed by Le Triomphe d'un homme nommé Cheval (1983)
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- El regreso de un hombre llamado Caballo
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $4,000,000 (estimated)
- Runtime
- 2h 9m(129 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content