IMDb RATING
5.4/10
564
YOUR RATING
When three coeds discover that the campus Casanova is dating them all at once, they lock him up in an attic and take turns having sex with him... to drain the stud of his potency.When three coeds discover that the campus Casanova is dating them all at once, they lock him up in an attic and take turns having sex with him... to drain the stud of his potency.When three coeds discover that the campus Casanova is dating them all at once, they lock him up in an attic and take turns having sex with him... to drain the stud of his potency.
Tom Ahearne
- Wilfred
- (as Thomas F. Ahearne)
Elizabeth Tanner
- Secretary to the Dean
- (uncredited)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
So much for the sexual revolution. This movie insults women, races and even gays. It doesn't mean to, it just comes naturally.
I found this on YouTube because I am a Yvette Mimeux fan but kept watching because of Christopher Jones' fabulous and beaudacious buuttocks. All four stars are for that.
I found this on YouTube because I am a Yvette Mimeux fan but kept watching because of Christopher Jones' fabulous and beaudacious buuttocks. All four stars are for that.
It would seem to be a real shame most of those involved, from writer
Stephen Yada to Christopher Jones, never really got to do much else.
Because this uneven, smart, well acted satire is way ahead of it's time;
and still surprises. The title gimmick, which was used to advertise the movie, is really one
of the weaker sections of the film, which looks at the battle of the
sexes in a way that really does mirror it's time, while treating it's
characters with humor and affection. If you can get a copy, it's well
worth going out of your way to see. Only the mediocre pop score does not
hold up well.
Stephen Yada to Christopher Jones, never really got to do much else.
Because this uneven, smart, well acted satire is way ahead of it's time;
and still surprises. The title gimmick, which was used to advertise the movie, is really one
of the weaker sections of the film, which looks at the battle of the
sexes in a way that really does mirror it's time, while treating it's
characters with humor and affection. If you can get a copy, it's well
worth going out of your way to see. Only the mediocre pop score does not
hold up well.
I was fascinated by the concept of this movie when it came out. I remember the poster and the trailer. But I didn't get to see it then because I was too young. (Somehow I did see "Barbarella" and "In Cold Blood." My parents must have been slipping.) Finally I have seen "Three In The Attic" and my expectations were no longer high. It was somewhat enjoyable and probably wouldn't have gotten made if "The Graduate" hadn't been a hit. (The finale even somewhat mirrors the earlier film.) Its ideas about gender conflicts, race, class, sex and death are interesting, but it's ultimately an exploitation movie with a Hollywood ending, cheaply made by American International who made a lot of fun trash.
The film (which stars Christopher Jones - in a nude scene showing his backside - square-jawed John Beck, Judy Pace, and top-billed Yvette Mimieux) takes place on a Vermont college campus and there are also brief shots of hippy-dippy 1960s Provincetown. There's not much to see in terms of Vermont scenery.
The film (which stars Christopher Jones - in a nude scene showing his backside - square-jawed John Beck, Judy Pace, and top-billed Yvette Mimieux) takes place on a Vermont college campus and there are also brief shots of hippy-dippy 1960s Provincetown. There's not much to see in terms of Vermont scenery.
I was about 15 years old when I saw this movie, in 1969, I think. I never saw it again but I never got it off my mind even until today. Why? because It was very funny and it was just a hilarious story and well thought out.
It tells a story where this guy has a number of girlfriends, they all found out he was cheating and decided to teach him a lesson that he couldn't refuse. Lots of laughter and hurting sides and you would keep wanting more and more.
It would still do well even today and would fit right in with today's society. I would love to see it again. It really was ahead of it's time.
It tells a story where this guy has a number of girlfriends, they all found out he was cheating and decided to teach him a lesson that he couldn't refuse. Lots of laughter and hurting sides and you would keep wanting more and more.
It would still do well even today and would fit right in with today's society. I would love to see it again. It really was ahead of it's time.
American International was a hot studio in the 1960s and it was NOT because it was producing quality films! Beach movies, LSD and hippie movies were quite popular with the small studio and they were very successful. Shot with rather small budgets, their films kept raking in the bucks during this era because their content appealed to younger, hipper viewers. Artistic masterpieces? Hardly....but they did have their own odd sort of appeal.
In many ways, "Three in the Attic" is exactly the sort of movie I expected from American International. It is jam-packed with sexual innuendo and is the sort of film that would have been banned only a decade earlier. But, despite this, it's not exactly a typical exploitation or trashy film. The acting and script are a bit of a surprise as they really did NOT suck!
This film is about Paxton Quigley (Christopher Jones) and why he was given this odd name is beyond me. When the film begins, you learn that he's being held prisoner in an attic and then the film jumps back so you can learn how and why he's in this situation. It seems that he and a young lady were in love....but Paxton couldn't resist temptation. When two other women practically throw themselves at him, he gives in to the sexual revolution and juggles all three women...having a LOT of sex and good times. However, eventually the three discover his dalliances and decide to teach him a less...to practically screw him to death in this attic prison!
Despite the salaciousness of the plot and the steamy story, the film actually has some interesting things to say about this sexual revolution. I am not saying it's exactly a deep film...but it is weird and worth seeing...especially when you look at it as an interesting snapshot of an unusual time. As for the ending, it really didn't make much sense...but it still was quite interesting!
In many ways, "Three in the Attic" is exactly the sort of movie I expected from American International. It is jam-packed with sexual innuendo and is the sort of film that would have been banned only a decade earlier. But, despite this, it's not exactly a typical exploitation or trashy film. The acting and script are a bit of a surprise as they really did NOT suck!
This film is about Paxton Quigley (Christopher Jones) and why he was given this odd name is beyond me. When the film begins, you learn that he's being held prisoner in an attic and then the film jumps back so you can learn how and why he's in this situation. It seems that he and a young lady were in love....but Paxton couldn't resist temptation. When two other women practically throw themselves at him, he gives in to the sexual revolution and juggles all three women...having a LOT of sex and good times. However, eventually the three discover his dalliances and decide to teach him a less...to practically screw him to death in this attic prison!
Despite the salaciousness of the plot and the steamy story, the film actually has some interesting things to say about this sexual revolution. I am not saying it's exactly a deep film...but it is weird and worth seeing...especially when you look at it as an interesting snapshot of an unusual time. As for the ending, it really didn't make much sense...but it still was quite interesting!
Did you know
- TriviaIn 1969, American International Pictures distributed this film on a double bill with Woody Allen's Woody Allen Number One (1966).
- GoofsThe length of Paxton's hair is constantly changing, especially in the scenes in the attic.
- Quotes
Dean Nazarin: Non-swimmers should never leap bare-assed into the sea of love. My dear, the sea of love is full of squid!
- Crazy creditsThe end credits feature a cartoon featuring an older married couple bickering about the movie they just watched -- i.e. the movie that preceded it!
- ConnectionsFeatured in Dusk to Dawn Drive-In Trash-o-Rama Show Vol. 7 (2002)
- How long is Three in the Attic?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Three in the Attic
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 30 minutes
- Sound mix
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
By what name was Comment séduire un play-boy (1968) officially released in Canada in English?
Answer